XO math people please critique my analysis of MPM 2016 voting irregularity
| Rusted heady feces | 12/20/17 | | Flushed elite lettuce | 12/20/17 | | violet location | 12/20/17 | | Flushed elite lettuce | 12/20/17 | | stirring state | 12/20/17 | | Lime talented main people | 12/20/17 | | Rusted heady feces | 12/20/17 | | zippy theatre windowlicker | 02/22/18 | | Hateful set dingle berry | 12/20/17 | | Rusted heady feces | 12/20/17 | | Exciting Roommate Box Office | 12/20/17 | | Rusted heady feces | 12/20/17 | | Flesh ceo hell | 12/21/17 | | Rusted heady feces | 12/20/17 | | Rusted heady feces | 12/20/17 | | Lascivious orchestra pit | 12/20/17 | | Flesh ceo hell | 12/20/17 | | Hateful set dingle berry | 12/20/17 | | Flesh ceo hell | 12/20/17 | | Flesh ceo hell | 12/20/17 | | Flesh ceo hell | 12/23/17 | | Flesh ceo hell | 12/20/17 | | self-centered personal credit line place of business | 12/23/17 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: December 20th, 2017 5:34 PM Author: Flesh ceo hell
solid analysis, correct math, correct conclusions and implications
the precise results of the analysis depend on your view that the data are normally distrbuted. eyeballing the histogram makes me comfortable that they probably are, but there are a bunch of tests you could do to confirm on a statistical level; you could also explore the possibility that there is a bimodal distribution although the histogram doesn’t look that way
but I’m sure this would be a hilarious outlier under any reasonable distribution
in summary: absolutely devastating
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3835527&forum_id=2#34969211) |
|
|