https://fairus.org/issue/publications-resources/fiscal-burden-illegal-immigration-united-states-taxpayers

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3861463&forum_id=2#35168480)

or is an idiot

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3861463&forum_id=2#35168491)

Nice try. Do you have any sources that aren't hate sites or are you just going to angrily spam this thread with a bunch of Daily Stormer links like your typical 95 IQ xo trumpmo?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3861463&forum_id=2#35168597)

"Uhh this guy's clearly flame! I win!"

sorry, bro. You've been found out. now stand your ground, pussy.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3861463&forum_id=2#35169072)

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/aug/3/illegal-immigrants-cost-taxpayers-750-billion-over/

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3861463&forum_id=2#35168844)

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/reminder-the-southern-poverty-law-center-is-a-fraud-and-nobody-should-treat-them-as-responsible-actors/article/2631852

Repeating a mistake made by many major media outlets before it, CNN on Thursday published a map of registered hate groups sourced entirely from the Southern Poverty Law Center, an irresponsible advocacy group that purports to operate as an objective assessor of hate. Just one day earlier, Apple CEO Tim Cook announced the company was set to make a $1 million donation to the SPLC as well.

But the SPLC's claim to objectivity is nothing less than fraudulent, a reality that informed observers of its practices from both the Left and Right accept. The routine of debunking their supposedly objective classifications occurs like clockwork each time a major outlet makes the mistake of turning to them when reporting on the many conservative thinkers and nonprofits the group absurdly designates as hateful.

Trump was breaking ground on immigration, then it all went to "shit"

Watch Full Screen

So here we go again.

The SPLC routinely lumps conservative advocacy groups in with legitimate hate organizations, putting proponents of traditional family values in the same category as neo-Nazis and the KKK. In a July note to supporters, the Family Research Council, a conservative nonprofit the SPLC has attacked, referred to the center as "a left wing smear group who has become exactly what they set out to fight, spreading hate and putting targets on people's backs."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3861463&forum_id=2#35168864)

2) Seriously strains the welfare system when these guys have kids - whatever money they contribute to the economy is dwarfed by the amount of money you have to spend to educate their kids, food stamps etc

3) Increase crime - dont fall for the lib bullshit where they lump legal and illegal immigrants together to discuss crime rates. Since we are talking about illegals they commit far more crime (especially serious violent crime) on average than americans or legal immigrants

we dont even have to make this into an alt-right/race based analysis. even without all that bullshit MASS illegal immigration is horrible for a lawful society and no country (not canada, not UK) tolerates it

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3861463&forum_id=2#35168793)

One in three individuals born in El Salvador currently lives in the United States. One in three. These aren't people who need HB-1 visas. Is this the type of labor the U.S. economy desperately needs?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3861463&forum_id=2#35168978)

https://www.heritage.org/immigration/commentary/look-milton-open-borders-and-the-welfare-state

A decade ago, Nobel prize-winning economist Milton Friedman admonished the Wall Street Journal for its idée fixe on open-border immigration policy. "It's just obvious you can't have free immigration and a welfare state," he warned. This remark adds insight to the current debate over immigration in the U.S. Senate.

To be fully understood, Friedman's comment should be viewed as applying not merely to means-tested welfare programs such as food stamps, Medicaid, and public housing, but to the entire redistributive transfer state. In the "transfer state," government taxes the upper middle class and shifts some $1.5 trillion in economic resources to lower-income groups through a vast variety benefits and subsidies. Across the globe, this sort of economic redistribution is the largest, if not the predominant, function of government in advanced societies.

The transfer state redistributes funds from those with high-skill and high-income levels to those with lower skill levels. Low-skill immigrants become natural recipients in this process. On average, low-skill immigrant families receive $30,160 per year in government benefits and services while paying $10,573 in taxes, creating a net fiscal deficit of $19,587 that has to be paid by higher-income taxpayers.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3861463&forum_id=2#35169009)

one thing that should also be considered a foundational argument against immigration is this-

it doesn't even matter if the overall impact of illegal immigration results in a net benefit to the country if that comes at the expense of citizens.

so, not only do proponents of illegal immigration need to establish that it's 'good' for the country as a whole, they should also establish that it's not detrimental to the country's citizens

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3861463&forum_id=2#35169016)