\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

NLRB says Google engineer memo was "so harmful, discriminatory, and disruptive

that it was ok to fire him https://www.bloomberg.com/news...
ruby national
  02/17/18
sounds like TRUMP needs to drain the NLRB swamp
yellow stirring pervert dingle berry
  02/17/18
he's put people on the NLRB who have already rolled back a l...
Fluffy indirect expression mental disorder
  02/17/18
...
confused big yarmulke
  02/17/18
cr NLRB is going to come out in favor of employers bigly in ...
bearded messiness fanboi
  02/17/18
...
confused big yarmulke
  02/17/18
good scolarship
ruby national
  02/17/18
ty brother
Fluffy indirect expression mental disorder
  02/17/18
They MAY have consulted with a labor lawyer? LOL by that yo...
180 sickened locus personal credit line
  02/17/18
You’d be surprised how often companies fail to seek advice f...
Fluffy indirect expression mental disorder
  02/17/18
This was a national story. They didn't fire him naked withou...
bistre box office
  02/17/18
I have no doubt they have competent employment attorneys in ...
Fluffy indirect expression mental disorder
  02/17/18
of course they got competent labor advice. it's literally th...
ruby national
  02/17/18
he's drawing a distinction between labor lawyers and employm...
bearded messiness fanboi
  02/19/18
the shitty article doesn't specify what the actual actionabl...
flatulent principal's office background story
  02/17/18
...
Translucent medicated masturbator
  02/17/18
in what way was it harmful outside of being disruptive?
confused big yarmulke
  02/17/18
Libs equate speech they don't like as violent and harmful, a...
boyish tan azn
  02/17/18
this decision wasn't made by a lib, it was made by a trump a...
Fluffy indirect expression mental disorder
  02/17/18
Fuck this shit
Translucent medicated masturbator
  02/17/18
...
yellow stirring pervert dingle berry
  02/17/18
...
lemon filthpig
  02/19/18
the speech was "so harmful" = unadulterated shitli...
boyish tan azn
  02/17/18
Whereas the statements from other Google employees were ok.
Violet hospital
  02/17/18
it's no use friend
razzle self-centered windowlicker patrolman
  02/17/18
180 decision to replace Christianity with "diversity&qu...
Flirting chrome generalized bond
  02/17/18
...
confused big yarmulke
  02/17/18
...
shimmering potus
  02/17/18
...
purple geriatric parlor sweet tailpipe
  02/17/18
...
clear trailer park hissy fit
  02/17/18
...
Sooty Feces Center
  02/17/18
...
ocher exciting ape
  02/17/18
...
Crimson Pocket Flask Cuckoldry
  02/17/18
...
Red Mind-boggling Den
  02/17/18
...
Umber parlour
  02/17/18
...
Violent charcoal mad-dog skullcap
  02/17/18
...
Nudist Cordovan Stage
  02/17/18
...
copper maniacal jap
  02/17/18
More like Corporatism:Diversity christianity:virgin birth
Maize abnormal coldplay fan
  02/19/18
...
lemon filthpig
  02/19/18
i assume this is apoealable to a real court?
hairraiser organic girlfriend cumskin
  02/17/18
No appeal. It’s the equivalent of prosecutorial discretion o...
Fluffy indirect expression mental disorder
  02/17/18
is this finding given deference in the civil suit in state c...
learning disabled sanctuary
  02/17/18
No, but the legal issues are 100% different there
Fluffy indirect expression mental disorder
  02/17/18
ty
learning disabled sanctuary
  02/17/18
Facts are harmful and disruptive
Lascivious Filthy Toilet Seat Lodge
  02/17/18
Serious question from a non-lawyer who knows zero about thes...
Violent charcoal mad-dog skullcap
  02/17/18
Doesn’t matter one way or another. The only thing the NLRA p...
Fluffy indirect expression mental disorder
  02/17/18


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: February 17th, 2018 11:04 AM
Author: ruby national

that it was ok to fire him

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-02-16/google-firing-of-damore-was-legal-u-s-labor-panel-lawyer-said

Google’s firing of an engineer over his controversial memo criticizing its diversity policies and “politically correct monoculture” didn’t violate U.S. labor law, a federal agency lawyer concluded.

Statements in James Damore’s 3,000-word memo “regarding biological differences between the sexes were so harmful, discriminatory, and disruptive” that they fell outside protections for collective action in the workplace, an associate general counsel for the National Labor Relations Board wrote in a six-page memo disclosed Thursday.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3895770&forum_id=2#35424059)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 17th, 2018 11:06 AM
Author: yellow stirring pervert dingle berry

sounds like TRUMP needs to drain the NLRB swamp

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3895770&forum_id=2#35424068)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 17th, 2018 11:12 AM
Author: Fluffy indirect expression mental disorder

he's put people on the NLRB who have already rolled back a lot of Obama NLRB precedent in just a few months.

in fact, this decision came from the NLRB's current general counsel, who has openly declared that he wants to roll back nearly everything the NLRB has done since 2009.

from what i have read, when they terminated him google was careful to rely ONLY on portions of the memo that were incendiary and arguably could constitute sex discrimination/harassment. they may have consulted with a labor lawyer before firing the guy (or they got lucky in not citing other portions of the memo).

if correct, this is not a controversial decision. the NLRA only protects concerted activity regarding "protected" subjects (pay, working conditions, etc.) if google truly only relied on shit like "WOMEN ARE BAD AT SCIENCE!" in the memo, the NLRA shouldn't protect statements like that anyway. (if you disagree, then you are in agreement, in principle, with the shitlibs Obama packed the NLRB with, who wanted to extend NLRA protection to almost any conduct no matter how tenuously related to working conditions affecting employees as a group.)



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3895770&forum_id=2#35424089)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 17th, 2018 11:13 AM
Author: confused big yarmulke



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3895770&forum_id=2#35424094)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 17th, 2018 11:14 AM
Author: bearded messiness fanboi

cr NLRB is going to come out in favor of employers bigly in the next couple years, and this is the opening salvo. Libs laughing & high-fiving about this memo don't realize it's a Trojan horse

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3895770&forum_id=2#35424103)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 17th, 2018 11:16 AM
Author: confused big yarmulke



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3895770&forum_id=2#35424109)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 17th, 2018 11:23 AM
Author: ruby national

good scolarship

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3895770&forum_id=2#35424161)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 17th, 2018 2:17 PM
Author: Fluffy indirect expression mental disorder

ty brother

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3895770&forum_id=2#35425303)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 17th, 2018 2:19 PM
Author: 180 sickened locus personal credit line

They MAY have consulted with a labor lawyer? LOL by that you mean their chief employment litigation attorney - who probably is an expert in his/her own right - consulted with whoever the best labor lawyer in the country is.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3895770&forum_id=2#35425318)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 17th, 2018 3:17 PM
Author: Fluffy indirect expression mental disorder

You’d be surprised how often companies fail to seek advice from someone who knows labor law. Even prominent employment attorneys often know dick about labor law, not even enough to spot the potential NLRA issue here

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3895770&forum_id=2#35425716)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 17th, 2018 3:25 PM
Author: bistre box office

This was a national story. They didn't fire him naked without any advice.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3895770&forum_id=2#35425755)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 17th, 2018 4:16 PM
Author: Fluffy indirect expression mental disorder

I have no doubt they have competent employment attorneys in house and/or consulted with an outside employment lawyer, but you can’t take for granted that they sought out or received competent labor advice.

Unless the memo was national news before he was fired and the stories were discussing the NLRA protections present in the memo, which I think is unlikely

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3895770&forum_id=2#35426057)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 17th, 2018 8:08 PM
Author: ruby national

of course they got competent labor advice. it's literally the 2nd most valuable in the world that employs tens of thousands of people

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3895770&forum_id=2#35427609)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 19th, 2018 9:35 AM
Author: bearded messiness fanboi

he's drawing a distinction between labor lawyers and employment lawyers. Normies don't even realize there's a difference but labor lawyers think they have some special insight into the arcane workings of the Act (got to call it "the Act" btw that's how they know you're "in") that mere employment lawyers could never hope to grasp

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3895770&forum_id=2#35435816)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 17th, 2018 3:15 PM
Author: flatulent principal's office background story

the shitty article doesn't specify what the actual actionable statements were. does the decision?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3895770&forum_id=2#35425701)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 17th, 2018 3:09 PM
Author: Translucent medicated masturbator



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3895770&forum_id=2#35425660)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 17th, 2018 11:07 AM
Author: confused big yarmulke

in what way was it harmful outside of being disruptive?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3895770&forum_id=2#35424070)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 17th, 2018 11:09 AM
Author: boyish tan azn

Libs equate speech they don't like as violent and harmful, and therefore reason it is not protected.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3895770&forum_id=2#35424076)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 17th, 2018 11:21 AM
Author: Fluffy indirect expression mental disorder

this decision wasn't made by a lib, it was made by a trump appointee who has declared outright war on all the shitlib Obama-era policies issued over the last 10 years.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3895770&forum_id=2#35424144)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 17th, 2018 3:10 PM
Author: Translucent medicated masturbator

Fuck this shit

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3895770&forum_id=2#35425668)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 17th, 2018 3:12 PM
Author: yellow stirring pervert dingle berry



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3895770&forum_id=2#35425681)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 19th, 2018 9:44 AM
Author: lemon filthpig



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3895770&forum_id=2#35435862)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 17th, 2018 11:08 AM
Author: boyish tan azn

the speech was "so harmful" = unadulterated shitlib in the NLRB

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3895770&forum_id=2#35424073)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 17th, 2018 11:10 AM
Author: Violet hospital

Whereas the statements from other Google employees were ok.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3895770&forum_id=2#35424081)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 17th, 2018 2:19 PM
Author: razzle self-centered windowlicker patrolman

it's no use friend

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3895770&forum_id=2#35425322)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 17th, 2018 11:15 AM
Author: Flirting chrome generalized bond

180 decision to replace Christianity with "diversity" as the moral/religious foundation of society. seems to be working out great so far.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3895770&forum_id=2#35424106)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 17th, 2018 11:15 AM
Author: confused big yarmulke



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3895770&forum_id=2#35424108)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 17th, 2018 11:16 AM
Author: shimmering potus



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3895770&forum_id=2#35424113)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 17th, 2018 11:18 AM
Author: purple geriatric parlor sweet tailpipe



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3895770&forum_id=2#35424120)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 17th, 2018 11:18 AM
Author: clear trailer park hissy fit



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3895770&forum_id=2#35424124)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 17th, 2018 11:19 AM
Author: Sooty Feces Center



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3895770&forum_id=2#35424135)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 17th, 2018 11:25 AM
Author: ocher exciting ape



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3895770&forum_id=2#35424175)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 17th, 2018 4:16 PM
Author: Crimson Pocket Flask Cuckoldry



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3895770&forum_id=2#35426059)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 17th, 2018 4:17 PM
Author: Red Mind-boggling Den



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3895770&forum_id=2#35426067)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 17th, 2018 4:34 PM
Author: Umber parlour



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3895770&forum_id=2#35426180)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 17th, 2018 6:55 PM
Author: Violent charcoal mad-dog skullcap



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3895770&forum_id=2#35427114)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 17th, 2018 7:00 PM
Author: Nudist Cordovan Stage



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3895770&forum_id=2#35427152)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 17th, 2018 8:20 PM
Author: copper maniacal jap



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3895770&forum_id=2#35427678)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 19th, 2018 9:41 AM
Author: Maize abnormal coldplay fan

More like

Corporatism:Diversity christianity:virgin birth

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3895770&forum_id=2#35435850)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 19th, 2018 9:44 AM
Author: lemon filthpig



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3895770&forum_id=2#35435864)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 17th, 2018 3:19 PM
Author: hairraiser organic girlfriend cumskin

i assume this is apoealable to a real court?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3895770&forum_id=2#35425719)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 17th, 2018 4:19 PM
Author: Fluffy indirect expression mental disorder

No appeal. It’s the equivalent of prosecutorial discretion on the part of the nlrb

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3895770&forum_id=2#35426079)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 17th, 2018 4:34 PM
Author: learning disabled sanctuary

is this finding given deference in the civil suit in state court?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3895770&forum_id=2#35426176)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 17th, 2018 4:57 PM
Author: Fluffy indirect expression mental disorder

No, but the legal issues are 100% different there

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3895770&forum_id=2#35426340)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 17th, 2018 5:06 PM
Author: learning disabled sanctuary

ty

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3895770&forum_id=2#35426410)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 17th, 2018 3:38 PM
Author: Lascivious Filthy Toilet Seat Lodge

Facts are harmful and disruptive

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3895770&forum_id=2#35425826)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 17th, 2018 6:58 PM
Author: Violent charcoal mad-dog skullcap

Serious question from a non-lawyer who knows zero about these issue.

Is the truth of the statement any kind of defense / work in his favor in any way? Or does that not matter at all b/c you could still be extremely disruptive with the truth...

The word "discriminatory" in that sentence though bugs me b/c for some reason it makes it seem like discriminatory implies untruth.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3895770&forum_id=2#35427137)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 17th, 2018 7:18 PM
Author: Fluffy indirect expression mental disorder

Doesn’t matter one way or another. The only thing the NLRA protects is concerted activity aimed at improving the workplace. The NLRB’s prosecutor found that he was terminated only for statements in the memo that had nothing to do with subjects protected by the NLRA so the case was dismissed. The agency did acknowledge that there were protected statements in the memo but google didn’t mention any of that content as the reason he was fired.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3895770&forum_id=2#35427302)