Serious Question: Why do people take Julia seriously?
| mustard persian | 02/20/18 | | Appetizing bat-shit-crazy therapy hairy legs | 02/20/18 | | slap-happy multi-billionaire | 02/20/18 | | cerebral reading party | 02/20/18 | | Galvanic yapping public bath jewess | 02/20/18 | | Passionate Ultramarine Famous Landscape Painting | 02/20/18 | | salmon deer antler den | 02/20/18 | | mustard persian | 02/20/18 | | Gay pea-brained location | 02/20/18 | | cerebral reading party | 02/20/18 | | mustard persian | 02/20/18 | | charismatic becky tanning salon | 02/20/18 | | black razzmatazz home black woman | 02/20/18 | | Galvanic yapping public bath jewess | 02/20/18 | | amber 180 house main people | 02/20/18 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: February 20th, 2018 4:29 PM Author: mustard persian
we know her life story, we saw her "analysis/insight" during 2016 election cycle, we see her consistently use management speak gibberish that doesn't really explain/support her predictions
Its one thing to be wrong (nobody can be right 100%, even being 50/50 on predictions is good batting average ) but what really stands out about Julia is her total inability to offer any kind of serious, logical analysis to back up her arguments. that is egregious
For ex. when somebody asked her why she feels Dow is due for a major correction in the near~medium time frame this is her answer. Now even if Dow has a major correction we shouldn't let her claim any credit for this bullshit analysis
"The answer is a combination of factors, in proportions we don’t yet understand, but one of which will surely be simple negative sentiment, as demonstrated by the big drops two weeks ago or practically any big decline in history. Fundamentals impact sentiment, but the two aren’t perfectly correlated, and market euphoria and panics are difgicult to predict or control."
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3898680&forum_id=2#35446674) |
|
|