\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Was Star Wars at $4 billion really that good of a deal?

Disney probably only nets like 10% of the gross on this stuf...
hairless base
  02/23/18
toy sales are actually really disappointing
harsh rusted school
  02/23/18
sup, dad
Henna center
  02/23/18
Not the way Disney has developed it. Boggles the mind the a...
Sooty reading party
  02/23/18
You have to think about it over the long run and the various...
hateful orchestra pit
  02/23/18
If they don't get their shit together the revenues from futu...
Brilliant haunted graveyard dysfunction
  02/23/18
they are going to make 50 more star wars movies.
Big lodge personal credit line
  02/23/18
Yeah, but at this rate they're going to get less and less pr...
hateful orchestra pit
  02/23/18
Oh no!
big-titted space
  02/24/18
The plan is to release one or two Star Wars movies a year in...
excitant cuck
  02/23/18
I'm thinking there will be a yuge drop off for the han solo ...
amber tanning salon
  02/23/18
I think Disney wildly overestimated the market for SW movies...
Sooty reading party
  02/23/18
tcr
hateful orchestra pit
  02/23/18
cr Phantom Menace was hot buttered garbage, but it had 17 ye...
Odious Topaz Dingle Berry Rigpig
  02/23/18
But even the Phantom Menace had some new memorable character...
hateful orchestra pit
  02/23/18
Every character in the prequels is better than every major c...
Bright exciting pit
  02/24/18
Agreed with the notable exception of Jar Jar.
hateful orchestra pit
  02/24/18
jar jar is the worst character of the franchise. it's not cl...
burgundy irradiated resort windowlicker
  03/08/18
If the comic book movies are any indication, they can releas...
Provocative public bath
  02/23/18
I think you meant "Marvel", not "comic book m...
Sooty reading party
  02/23/18
Right, and they don't have to add "cost of expensive mo...
hateful orchestra pit
  02/23/18
but Marvel movies are actually well made
harsh rusted school
  02/23/18
Leave.
hairless base
  02/23/18
...
Carmine seedy national security agency crackhouse
  02/23/18
...
duck-like at-the-ready office
  02/23/18
C R
Bright exciting pit
  02/24/18
ROFL, thanks armchair neckbeard
big-titted space
  02/24/18
Disney is no longer marketing Star Wars movies in China as S...
Lemon boltzmann
  02/23/18
...
bonkers pearl faggot firefighter locus
  02/23/18
The new SW has many flaws, but not being highly appealing to...
dark bawdyhouse
  02/24/18
Definitely yes (George Lucas)
Odious Topaz Dingle Berry Rigpig
  02/23/18
Ran here
Pontificating jet therapy
  02/23/18
Star Wars is det
Filthy Orange Ape
  02/23/18
...
Diverse bipolar trailer park
  02/23/18
next movie they're going to put rey in a bikini on a leash b...
supple messiness foreskin
  02/23/18
Will not complain about that tbh
Pontificating jet therapy
  02/23/18
She literally has no boobs.
hairless base
  02/23/18
I would have loved to have been in the Disney board room whe...
Provocative public bath
  02/23/18
the last shitty movie made $1.3B, cost $200M to produce, add...
Crusty mahogany nibblets
  02/23/18
they also generate significant revenue in various relicensin...
violent degenerate
  02/23/18
They have a ton of overhead that isn't accounted for in the ...
hairless base
  02/23/18
Non sequitur ballparked costs at $750 million. They still ma...
shimmering karate parlour
  02/23/18
"I am assuming that they turn like a 10% profit on thes...
Canary cumskin station
  02/23/18
I think they will make money in the long run, sure, but we d...
hairless base
  02/24/18
LJL.
navy very tactful sex offender
  02/23/18
theme park stuff will help
coral sadistic hissy fit rehab
  02/23/18
have they made any video games based on the new trilogy whic...
Medicated translucent field genital piercing
  02/23/18
they will continue to make SPS spinoffs about the backstory ...
flushed stirring pervert nowag
  02/23/18
looking forward to Bib Fortuna (2031)
Carmine seedy national security agency crackhouse
  02/23/18
The new movies are horrible but it was a great deal for Disn...
grizzly gas station double fault
  02/23/18
They paid $4 billion. So far they've released 3 movies which...
Flesh brunch
  02/24/18
The movies grossed whatever they grossed, but we have no ide...
hairless base
  02/24/18
So far this acquisition has been complete garbage. Disney st...
Bright exciting pit
  02/24/18
This is how I feel too.. I think Solo was destined to fail e...
excitant cuck
  02/24/18
lolwut. this is an absolute steal
Submissive menage
  02/24/18
This. I don't get this thread. In hindsight the deal makes...
big-titted space
  02/24/18
You’re forgottening the theme park tie-ins. The Star Wars re...
Boyish Chartreuse Mad Cow Disease Candlestick Maker
  02/24/18
Yeah but they probably could've done this w/o having to buy ...
dark bawdyhouse
  02/24/18
Now Disney can hammer the shit out of it as only Disney can.
Boyish Chartreuse Mad Cow Disease Candlestick Maker
  02/24/18
Keep in mind that they bought Lucasfilm for $4B, not just SW...
dark bawdyhouse
  02/24/18
(((Iger))) got gaped on this deal
Bright exciting pit
  02/24/18
Just the movies to date have grossed more than $4 billion an...
big-titted space
  02/24/18
Someday they'll rerelease the original versions of the origi...
dark bawdyhouse
  02/25/18
Iron Man director Jon Favreau to write and produce a live-ac...
Crusty mahogany nibblets
  03/08/18


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: February 23rd, 2018 8:30 AM
Author: hairless base

Disney probably only nets like 10% of the gross on this stuff. The movies cost a shitload, and then you have all of their overhead and shit, plus the cost to buy reviews (i.e. "marketing").

I guess since they have Toy Rights, this is all moot, but still. So the Films are an outlet for marxist propaganda and the Toys are the moneymakers? How many fuckin toys are there really? How much does Disney get when an incel buys an $800 lego millenium falcon?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3901403&forum_id=2#35468134)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 23rd, 2018 8:32 AM
Author: harsh rusted school

toy sales are actually really disappointing

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3901403&forum_id=2#35468143)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 23rd, 2018 9:14 AM
Author: Henna center

sup, dad

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3901403&forum_id=2#35468288)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 23rd, 2018 8:52 AM
Author: Sooty reading party

Not the way Disney has developed it. Boggles the mind the amount of money Kathleen Kennedy has thrown away pursuing inane shitlibisms.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3901403&forum_id=2#35468210)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 23rd, 2018 8:55 AM
Author: hateful orchestra pit

You have to think about it over the long run and the various revenue streams.

1. One movie per year.

2. At least one video game per year.

3. All the merchandising, merchandising, merchandising (thanks Mel Brooks).

That said, Disney has fucked it up by letting idiots run the franchise so no, all that still won't ever result in a good ROI.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3901403&forum_id=2#35468216)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 23rd, 2018 9:23 AM
Author: Brilliant haunted graveyard dysfunction

If they don't get their shit together the revenues from future films could drop off a cliff as people completely lose interest. They've probably done some irreversible damage already. But anyway I thought I read that between the three out already that they'd already made their money back (not suggesting they couldn't have made a better $4 billion investment though).

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3901403&forum_id=2#35468326)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 23rd, 2018 9:00 AM
Author: Big lodge personal credit line

they are going to make 50 more star wars movies.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3901403&forum_id=2#35468228)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 23rd, 2018 9:02 AM
Author: hateful orchestra pit

Yeah, but at this rate they're going to get less and less profitable.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3901403&forum_id=2#35468234)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 24th, 2018 9:07 AM
Author: big-titted space

Oh no!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3901403&forum_id=2#35476279)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 23rd, 2018 9:13 AM
Author: excitant cuck

The plan is to release one or two Star Wars movies a year in perpetuity, they will turn a tidy profit on the deal although I really wish everyone would just let the franchise die

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3901403&forum_id=2#35468282)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 23rd, 2018 9:16 AM
Author: amber tanning salon

I'm thinking there will be a yuge drop off for the han solo movie and the next actual movie. I'm probably not gonna see them and it wasn't even the sjw shit, the last jedi was just a shitty movie with shallow storyline and dumb gags

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3901403&forum_id=2#35468293)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 23rd, 2018 9:22 AM
Author: Sooty reading party

I think Disney wildly overestimated the market for SW movies, and I don't see it as a viable 1 movie a year franchise in perpetuity, even if they were better than the current terrible product. SW "demand" was based more on artificial scarcity caused by Lucas's reluctance to make more. Its also something of a zombie franchise based on 3 movies made 40 years ago (prequels? lol) and there is only so much you can mine from those. And Disney seems to have extreme reluctance to create any new mythology.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3901403&forum_id=2#35468321)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 23rd, 2018 9:30 AM
Author: hateful orchestra pit

tcr

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3901403&forum_id=2#35468355)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 23rd, 2018 9:32 AM
Author: Odious Topaz Dingle Berry Rigpig

cr Phantom Menace was hot buttered garbage, but it had 17 years of pent-up demand behind it. Now it's like wow, another star Wars already?

If you look at the toy aisle it is split 50/50 between Darth Vader/Yoda stuff and the Rey stuff. That's a very bad sign for Disney that the new movies aren't getting any traction.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3901403&forum_id=2#35468363)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 23rd, 2018 9:37 AM
Author: hateful orchestra pit

But even the Phantom Menace had some new memorable character. Darth Maul/Count Dooku were at least kind of cool and not blatant ripoffs of Vader the way Darth Emo is. Rey is also just a more preposterous and girl power version of Luke Skywalker. Even young Obi-wan in the prequels was more successful as a character than anything they had in the recent movies.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3901403&forum_id=2#35468394)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 24th, 2018 8:43 AM
Author: Bright exciting pit

Every character in the prequels is better than every major character in TTT 8.

That includes Hayden Christensen and McGregor and especially Christopher Lee.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3901403&forum_id=2#35476213)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 24th, 2018 9:18 PM
Author: hateful orchestra pit

Agreed with the notable exception of Jar Jar.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3901403&forum_id=2#35480596)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 8th, 2018 2:20 PM
Author: burgundy irradiated resort windowlicker

jar jar is the worst character of the franchise. it's not close.

anakin was horrible, but is comparable to the other trash characters. anakin is a good candidate for 2nd worst sw character of all time, but #1 is a lock



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3901403&forum_id=2#35562598)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 23rd, 2018 9:39 AM
Author: Provocative public bath

If the comic book movies are any indication, they can release a new Star Wars movie each year for the next 10 years at least and it will make more than $500M

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3901403&forum_id=2#35468407)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 23rd, 2018 10:01 AM
Author: Sooty reading party

I think you meant "Marvel", not "comic book movies", and Marvel works because they developed a very consistent lowest-common denominator style that is also popular oversees. It has almost nothing to do with Marvel IP (did anyone know or care about the "Iron Man" or the "Ant Man" or the "Black Panther Man" until those movies were made?). No point in paying billions to get SW IP then try to force into a Marvelish style which would clash and just piss off actual SW fans.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3901403&forum_id=2#35468545)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 23rd, 2018 11:48 AM
Author: hateful orchestra pit

Right, and they don't have to add "cost of expensive movies" to "need to justify $4 billion initial purchase".

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3901403&forum_id=2#35469350)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 23rd, 2018 11:33 AM
Author: harsh rusted school

but Marvel movies are actually well made

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3901403&forum_id=2#35469232)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 23rd, 2018 5:16 PM
Author: hairless base

Leave.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3901403&forum_id=2#35472198)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 23rd, 2018 8:27 PM
Author: Carmine seedy national security agency crackhouse



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3901403&forum_id=2#35473652)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 23rd, 2018 9:50 AM
Author: duck-like at-the-ready office



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3901403&forum_id=2#35468480)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 24th, 2018 8:40 AM
Author: Bright exciting pit

C R

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3901403&forum_id=2#35476205)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 24th, 2018 9:07 AM
Author: big-titted space

ROFL, thanks armchair neckbeard

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3901403&forum_id=2#35476282)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 23rd, 2018 9:15 AM
Author: Lemon boltzmann

Disney is no longer marketing Star Wars movies in China as Star Wars movies. When you have to remove the name of the most expensive franchise in movie history to get it to sell in China, you've already lost.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3901403&forum_id=2#35468290)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 23rd, 2018 12:14 PM
Author: bonkers pearl faggot firefighter locus



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3901403&forum_id=2#35469599)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 24th, 2018 9:02 AM
Author: dark bawdyhouse

The new SW has many flaws, but not being highly appealing to the rike-a's isn't one of them

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3901403&forum_id=2#35476262)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 23rd, 2018 9:31 AM
Author: Odious Topaz Dingle Berry Rigpig

Definitely yes (George Lucas)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3901403&forum_id=2#35468357)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 23rd, 2018 12:12 PM
Author: Pontificating jet therapy

Ran here

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3901403&forum_id=2#35469577)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 23rd, 2018 9:33 AM
Author: Filthy Orange Ape

Star Wars is det

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3901403&forum_id=2#35468374)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 23rd, 2018 11:50 AM
Author: Diverse bipolar trailer park



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3901403&forum_id=2#35469368)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 23rd, 2018 9:39 AM
Author: supple messiness foreskin

next movie they're going to put rey in a bikini on a leash because they are OUT OF IDEAS and DESPERATE FOR MONEY

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3901403&forum_id=2#35468408)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 23rd, 2018 12:20 PM
Author: Pontificating jet therapy

Will not complain about that tbh

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3901403&forum_id=2#35469663)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 23rd, 2018 5:16 PM
Author: hairless base

She literally has no boobs.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3901403&forum_id=2#35472203)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 23rd, 2018 9:42 AM
Author: Provocative public bath

I would have loved to have been in the Disney board room when they pitched this.

"We'll take Star Wars, add in characters representing all genders and nationalities to appeal to a GLOBAL audience, and release a new movie every year for the next 20 years until we've bled the entire franchise to death. We expect to get a 25% ROIC."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3901403&forum_id=2#35468429)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 23rd, 2018 11:32 AM
Author: Crusty mahogany nibblets

the last shitty movie made $1.3B, cost $200M to produce, add double or even triple that for marketing costs, and they are still making a lot of money. plus licensing makes them a ton too (not just "toy sales"). of course it's gonna be a good deal

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3901403&forum_id=2#35469223)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 23rd, 2018 11:53 AM
Author: violent degenerate

they also generate significant revenue in various relicensing deals and such for many years.

LMAO, XO is so unbelievably bad at discussing business, econ, investing, anything. so typical of aspie-ville.

yes guys, what a total dog of an extremely lucrative investment because they took franchise in a shitlib direction. how dare they appeal to young people!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3901403&forum_id=2#35469405)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 23rd, 2018 5:22 PM
Author: hairless base

They have a ton of overhead that isn't accounted for in the "budget" of these films that is completely inestimable and could be extravagant. I am assuming that they turn like a 10% profit on these when all is said and done, given the disappointing performance in the Orient.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3901403&forum_id=2#35472239)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 23rd, 2018 8:13 PM
Author: shimmering karate parlour

Non sequitur ballparked costs at $750 million. They still make a great deal more on that investment than most studios make on most movies. They also bought all the Star Wars cartoons, video games, other licensing and merchandising. The movies drive the revenue of all this other shit. It's short-sighted and ignorant of how these properties are valuable to say "derrrrr the movies are too expensive and sometimes don't do good in Asia!" It's one of the single most valuable properties in entertainment and they have already cleared close to a billion on the new films.

Only the XO aspie brain trust would take a look at Star Wars and think "haha, Disney got cucked!" because the board vaguely perceives the most recent movie as underperforming.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3901403&forum_id=2#35473552)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 23rd, 2018 8:29 PM
Author: Canary cumskin station

"I am assuming that they turn like a 10% profit on these when all is said and done" you seem dumb and you're clearly just pulling that number from your ass.

1) non sequitur's math makes a lot more sense than yours. industry standard assumption is that a film is profitable in theaters if its total (incl international) revenue is > 3-3.5x production budget, which the last movie easily satisfies. this does not include revenue from DVD sales/rentals, i.e. TLJ presumably started delivering a hard dollar profit after it crossed $700mm theater receipts. sales/rentals will be another $400mm+ which is all gravy.

2) "They have a ton of overhead that isn't accounted for in the 'budget' of these films that is completely inestimable and could be extravagant." Again, either you're pulling this out of thin air or your statement would apply equally to basically any big budget action film (MCU, Star Trek franchise, etc), which is not, by itself, a persuasive reason to assume standard industry metrics per 1 don't apply. Also your completely amorphous "number numbers they don't tell the whole story" bullshit cuts both ways. Disney is likely to realize additional revenue and profit from the star wars brand that's difficult to calculate but still contributes to the bottom line. For example, adding Star Wars rides and attractions to Disney theme parks will almost certainly increase ticket sales to their parks, even though it's difficult to calculate just how many marginal tickets are being sold to guests who otherwise wouldn't pay $400/head to stand around in line at some theme park in FL/CA.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3901403&forum_id=2#35473674)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 24th, 2018 8:32 AM
Author: hairless base

I think they will make money in the long run, sure, but we don't really know how much any of this shit costs so hear me out -

Lucas was worth an estimated $1.5 billion before the sale of Star Wars. Lucas made all of these movies after the first one with his own money. He owned Lucasfilm, and Lucasarts, and got licensing fees from all of the Legos and everything else for 30 years. Still only worth $1.5 billion. And that's including all of his other ventures too like Indiana Jones and shit. Assuming that every movie henceforth will gross less and less, and assuming that the combined ~$6 billion of inflation-adjusted gross of the OT+PT and 30 years of licensed crap was only enough to net $1.5 billion (assuming he didn't just invest in fuckin' pets.com or some shit), what do you think of the deal Disney made now? Just stating opinions, don't shoot the messenger.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3901403&forum_id=2#35476179)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 23rd, 2018 12:16 PM
Author: navy very tactful sex offender

LJL.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3901403&forum_id=2#35469616)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 23rd, 2018 12:41 PM
Author: coral sadistic hissy fit rehab

theme park stuff will help

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3901403&forum_id=2#35469870)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 23rd, 2018 5:17 PM
Author: Medicated translucent field genital piercing

have they made any video games based on the new trilogy which are actually good?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3901403&forum_id=2#35472218)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 23rd, 2018 5:25 PM
Author: flushed stirring pervert nowag

they will continue to make SPS spinoffs about the backstory of every character in perpetuity (see: Han Solo)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3901403&forum_id=2#35472260)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 23rd, 2018 8:29 PM
Author: Carmine seedy national security agency crackhouse

looking forward to Bib Fortuna (2031)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3901403&forum_id=2#35473670)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 23rd, 2018 8:32 PM
Author: grizzly gas station double fault

The new movies are horrible but it was a great deal for Disney. These aren't Star Wars movies coming out; they are Marvel movies with Marvel characters with Star Wars skins on them

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3901403&forum_id=2#35473688)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 24th, 2018 2:04 AM
Author: Flesh brunch

They paid $4 billion. So far they've released 3 movies which have made $4 billion. They are making like 6 more movies as we speak. They are making TV shows and cartoons. The president of Canada wears Star Was socks. Petco is filled with Star Wars dog toys. They are building a giant Star Wars wing of Disney World.

How can you not think it's a great deal for Disney? Star Wars is basically the licensing equivalent of "red" at this point. "Does your kid want a red backpack or a Star Wars backpack?" "Do you want a red USB storage or a Star Wars USB storage?" "Do you want a red mailbox or a Star Wars mailbox?"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3901403&forum_id=2#35475570)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 24th, 2018 8:35 AM
Author: hairless base

The movies grossed whatever they grossed, but we have no idea what the net is. And we have no idea what putting Yoda on a pair of socks is actually worth.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3901403&forum_id=2#35476190)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 24th, 2018 8:38 AM
Author: Bright exciting pit

So far this acquisition has been complete garbage. Disney still hasn't felt the full effects of how atrocious Star Wars 8 was.

8 was utter PC trash that dramatically underperformed at the box office. It could very well ruin their company.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3901403&forum_id=2#35476200)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 24th, 2018 9:22 AM
Author: excitant cuck

This is how I feel too.. I think Solo was destined to fail even before 8 but I think 9 will really underperform too.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3901403&forum_id=2#35476344)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 24th, 2018 8:55 AM
Author: Submissive menage

lolwut. this is an absolute steal

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3901403&forum_id=2#35476239)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 24th, 2018 12:14 PM
Author: big-titted space

This. I don't get this thread. In hindsight the deal makes sense at 2x or 3x.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3901403&forum_id=2#35477011)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 24th, 2018 8:57 AM
Author: Boyish Chartreuse Mad Cow Disease Candlestick Maker

You’re forgottening the theme park tie-ins. The Star Wars resort they’ll eventually build at WDW will instantly become their #1 property. Plus the lands at Disneyland and Disney World. $100+ plus a day ticket to buy a $20 coke from the Cantina-themed drink stand.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3901403&forum_id=2#35476241)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 24th, 2018 9:04 AM
Author: dark bawdyhouse

Yeah but they probably could've done this w/o having to buy Lucasfilm outright. They've had Star Tours for 30 years, right?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3901403&forum_id=2#35476271)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 24th, 2018 9:12 AM
Author: Boyish Chartreuse Mad Cow Disease Candlestick Maker

Now Disney can hammer the shit out of it as only Disney can.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3901403&forum_id=2#35476311)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 24th, 2018 9:18 AM
Author: dark bawdyhouse

Keep in mind that they bought Lucasfilm for $4B, not just SW. That includes other IP (thought Indiana Jones is probably the only good one). It also includes ILM and Skywalker Sound, which do fx for lots and lots of big movies. ILM has to insanely valuable to Disney on its own

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3901403&forum_id=2#35476328)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 24th, 2018 9:27 AM
Author: Bright exciting pit

(((Iger))) got gaped on this deal

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3901403&forum_id=2#35476361)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 24th, 2018 12:15 PM
Author: big-titted space

Just the movies to date have grossed more than $4 billion and that's just world wide box office to date.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3901403&forum_id=2#35477017)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2018 2:02 PM
Author: dark bawdyhouse

Someday they'll rerelease the original versions of the original trilogy and make a killing on that.

A lot of people here just don't get they bought a lot more than the right to make new SW movies for 4bn

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3901403&forum_id=2#35483839)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 8th, 2018 1:01 PM
Author: Crusty mahogany nibblets

Iron Man director Jon Favreau to write and produce a live-action Star Wars series for Disney's new streaming service — The director of Iron Man and The Jungle Book will helm the series for Disney's new direct-to-consumer platform. — Lucasfilm is excited to announce that Emmy-nominated producer …

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3901403&forum_id=2#35561852)