If Trump tweets are used against him, should prezs remain silent for 4 years?
| Pale Comical Stock Car | 03/17/18 | | vivacious milky address | 03/17/18 | | Pale Comical Stock Car | 03/17/18 | | Swollen motley set idea he suggested | 03/17/18 | | Pale Comical Stock Car | 03/17/18 | | vivacious milky address | 03/17/18 | | Hairraiser giraffe shrine | 03/17/18 | | Pale Comical Stock Car | 03/17/18 | | flesh cowardly area filthpig | 03/17/18 | | Pale Comical Stock Car | 03/17/18 | | flesh cowardly area filthpig | 03/17/18 | | Pale Comical Stock Car | 03/17/18 | | Dashing orange fat ankles | 03/17/18 |
Poast new message in this thread
|
Date: March 17th, 2018 3:50 PM Author: Swollen motley set idea he suggested
lmao you failed evidence right? this is true only if someone else took trump's dictation, tweeted for him, and it was not made in the regular course of business AND wasn't a statement against interest AND wasn't an excited utterance AND (insert twenty other hearsay exceptions that apply)
oh and that "90 days will he make it" isn't hearsay either bc it's not submitted to prove "90 days" is true, it'd be submitted for another reason (i.e., Trump's tweet wasn't "I'm going to fire him because XYZ")
jfc did you miss the whole "i am alive" lesson on like day 2 of evidence
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3921430&forum_id=2#35626733) |
|
|