If Trump tweets are used against him, should prezs remain silent for 4 years?
| effete nibblets voyeur | 03/17/18 | | Mauve alcoholic windowlicker | 03/17/18 | | effete nibblets voyeur | 03/17/18 | | Wonderful Violent Dog Poop | 03/17/18 | | effete nibblets voyeur | 03/17/18 | | Mauve alcoholic windowlicker | 03/17/18 | | charismatic jap | 03/17/18 | | effete nibblets voyeur | 03/17/18 | | Autistic Adventurous Resort | 03/17/18 | | effete nibblets voyeur | 03/17/18 | | Autistic Adventurous Resort | 03/17/18 | | effete nibblets voyeur | 03/17/18 | | Sooty Passionate Theater Stage Wrinkle | 03/17/18 |
Poast new message in this thread
|
Date: March 17th, 2018 3:50 PM Author: Wonderful Violent Dog Poop
lmao you failed evidence right? this is true only if someone else took trump's dictation, tweeted for him, and it was not made in the regular course of business AND wasn't a statement against interest AND wasn't an excited utterance AND (insert twenty other hearsay exceptions that apply)
oh and that "90 days will he make it" isn't hearsay either bc it's not submitted to prove "90 days" is true, it'd be submitted for another reason (i.e., Trump's tweet wasn't "I'm going to fire him because XYZ")
jfc did you miss the whole "i am alive" lesson on like day 2 of evidence
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3921430&forum_id=2#35626733) |
|
|