Furthermore, the redactions DOJ put out redacted only the exonerating info. No national security or law enforcement interest was protected by the redactions.

https://twitter.com/seanmdav/status/992552049249308672?s=19

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3968520&forum_id=2#35984830)

also FWIW federal public defenders are very very good

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3968520&forum_id=2#35985344)

He can probably find someone for a $5k flat fee.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3968520&forum_id=2#35987738)

Has anyone ever done it before?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3968520&forum_id=2#35987189)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3968520&forum_id=2#35984883)

if a trump executive branch not daring to do something is crucial to his continued freedom, then ljl jury nullification is his last and best hope

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3968520&forum_id=2#35985463)

afaik "sources" are the only thing saying 302s were falsified at this point, have you seen anything more official on the topic? if not, which evidence would be more credible, a report from an independent govt oversight apparatus or testimony from some jerkoff leaking info to the daily caller or whatever

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3968520&forum_id=2#35987493)

https://www.cnn.com/2017/12/01/politics/michael-flynn-court-filing/index.html

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3968520&forum_id=2#35987246)

Like it's pretty crazy that the DNC can funnel $6 million to a foreign spy to dig up dirt and no one cares about it as a campaign violation - but Trump not disclosing that he is paying of a porn star $150k means the feds have to bust down attorney client privelege.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3968520&forum_id=2#35985415)

it's not a campaign violation to PAY a foreigner to do something for you, holy shit every fucking campaign pays some mexican nationals to build their stages and shit, jfc xo 2018

you're confused because it's a violation to accept donations to your campaign, or at least the foreign national violates the law when he does it

re the stormy daniels stuff, if cohen paid her off right before the election with his own money, that's a contribution to the trump campaign in excess of the max contrib limits, holy fucking shit xo 2018

this isn't even hard, it's goddamn black letter law, did you get like a 130 on the lsat

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3968520&forum_id=2#35985557)

It's a strikingly similar claim to the Stormi Daniels payment, though obviously orders of magnitude larger and much shadier in nature given that the Daniels payment is very plausibly personal in nature.

But anyways, lol at this statement coming from a lib right now - wtf is the point of the Mueller violation that LOL x1000:

"it's not a campaign violation to PAY a foreigner to do something for you"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3968520&forum_id=2#35985725)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3968520&forum_id=2#35985530)

Sorry, but no, I am not talking to you. Applies to all law enforcement.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3968520&forum_id=2#35985566)

The revised scope memo from Rosenstein was dated August 2. But the Mueller ordered no knock raid in the wee hours on Manafort’s home was earlier in late July (26th IIRC). That means Mueller did not have written scope authority to order the raid when it happened. Granting it later is a clear case of ‘ex post facto’ law.

Now, anything ex post facto is constitutionally prohibited by Article 1 9.3 (Fed) and Article 1 10 (state).’”Law” in this case is easily extendable to “legal (procedural) consequences of laws”. I skip the several clear SCOTUS rulings on this minor derivative point. So the Manafort raid was illegal and unconstitutional independent of the ex post facto 2 August revised scope.

Consequences? Is clear prosecutorial misconduct. The two usual remedies are disbarment and prosecutors subject to civilian lawsuits for damages.

But there is a further seldom used criminal pathway via the Citizen Protection Act of 1998, aka 28USC 530B, WHICH EXPRESSLY INCLUDES federal special counsels. It makes an ex post facto prosecution CRIMINAL contempt of court. Per 42USC1995, upon conviction that offense is 6 month in jail for all involved prosecutors.

So Judge Ellis is playing legal hardball with Mueller concerning Manafort, and Mueller does not have a defensible position."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3968520&forum_id=2#35987039)