Still good stuff though. After reading his piece on Robin Williams suicide, I became a fan.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3978287&forum_id=2#36061918)

but it's not like he came up with NOWAG. so whatever, I don't care if he "steals" from xo, I was just using that word to convey that he gets some material from xo.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3978287&forum_id=2#36062742)

but in general, yeah, we create some kooky content but not in meme form.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3978287&forum_id=2#36061879)

if I write a paragraph or two about moving to a new city at age 30 it can become famous on xo--but it's not portable enough to be viral.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3978287&forum_id=2#36061953)

"We're not fags" - XO

"We're all fags" - XO

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3978287&forum_id=2#36062273)

On a recent ninety-degree day in New York City, I went for a walk and thought about how my life would look through incel eyes. I’m twenty-nine, so I’m a little old and used up: incels fetishize teen-agers and virgins (they use the abbreviation “JBs,” for jailbait), and they describe women who have sought pleasure in their sex lives as “whores” riding a “cock carousel.” I’m a feminist, which is disgusting to them. (“It is obvious that women are inferior, that is why men have always been in control of women.”) I was wearing a crop top and shorts, the sort of outfit that they believe causes men to rape women. (“Now watch as the level of rapes mysteriously rise up.”) In the elaborate incel taxonomy of participants in the sexual marketplace, I am a Becky, devoting my attentions to a Chad. I’m probably a “roastie,” too—another term they use for women with sexual experience, denoting labia that have turned into roast beef from overuse.

Pic of author with boyfriend:

https://twitter.com/jiatolentino/status/516315175881035777

caption: LMAO my fucking boyfriend looks so much like Ryan Fitzpatrick.

AGWWG!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3978287&forum_id=2#36061876)

she's decently atractive at least. White people probably all look the same to her.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3978287&forum_id=2#36061926)

Also if what she is saying is true, why is she surprised that there are people complaining about this power structure?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3978287&forum_id=2#36061934)

try googling it

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3978287&forum_id=2#36061956)

https://jezebel.com/what-should-we-say-about-david-bowie-and-lori-maddox-1754533894

On sharing an account of a 15 year old girl who met Bowie

"We got to the Beverly Hilton and all went up to Bowie’s enormous suite...He was beautiful and clever and poised. I was incredibly turned on. Bowie excused himself and left us in this big living room with white shag carpeting and floor-to-ceiling windows. Stuey brought out Champagne and hash. We were getting stoned when, all of a sudden, the bedroom door opens and there is Bowie in this fucking beautiful red and orange and yellow kimono.

He focused his famously two-colored eyes on me and said, “Lori, darling, can you come with me?” Sable looked like she wanted to murder me. He walked me through his bedroom and into the bathroom, where he dropped his kimono. He got into the tub, already filled with water, and asked me to wash him. Of course I did. Then he escorted me into the bedroom, gently took off my clothes, and de-virginized me.

Two hours later, I went to check on Sable. She was all fucked up in the living room, walking around, fogging up windows and writing, “I want to fuck David.” I told him what she was doing and that I felt so bad. Bowie said, “Well, darling, bring her in.” That night I lost my virginity and had my first threesome".

Get ready for some True Scholarship.

Maddox, enthusiastic and starry-eyed a full 43 years later, does not recount her encounter as rape; legally, however, it would have been in the state of California, and a strong subset of today’s moral vocabulary dictates that it was, qualitatively, regardless of what Maddox says, an act of coercion—that he was an abuser and a predator no matter what.

There’s a sense right now of a watershed: because of new language, newly open channels, and new consensus on what constitutes abuse, once-beloved men are being exposed on what feels like a weekly basis for having taken sexual advantage of less powerful women. These incidents are brought to light as exceptions, but they’re beginning to feel like the norm—particularly for industries in which women are expected to be both easygoing and sexual to variously exaggerated degrees: comedy, music, acting, porn.

And the “separate the art from the artist” argument has been permanently changed by Bill Cosby, who will be remembered as a serial rapist, as he deserves. For Bowie, the same idea has started to foment—that this encounter with Maddox (and the others it implies) should be, as with Cosby, his major legacy. “RIP a child rapist,” said a tipster. On Twitter, a search for “David Bowie rapist” pulls up hundreds of people expressing combinations of anger, smugness, contrarianism, righteousness, and sincere conviction that the Grammys should not be celebrating him, that Tavi Gevinson should not be writing about him, the “rapist” description is primary and exactly right.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3978287&forum_id=2#36062006)

rock stars smash consensual 15 year old pussy because they can.

but sure, there's undoubtedly a huge moral difference between a 15 year old getting special treatment from David bowie and an 18 year old "sex-positive" "body-positive" "woke" "sex-worker" "leaning in" to "feminist empowerment" by getting used by hundreds of men and writing an essay about it on Reddit. We know where our interlocutor from the new yorker would stand on that.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3978287&forum_id=2#36062133)

these slimepits don't know anything and are therefore incapable of informing anyone about anything. so people who can or want to think are forced to build alternatives to now irrelevant (((mainstream journalism)))

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3978287&forum_id=2#36062569)

She clearly doesn't fit in to the American cultural milieu (or at least the historic milieu), and thus seeks to attack it by promoting anything else that really doesn't fit in either.

Anyone who doesn't fit in with a broader culture/group first and foremost wishes for people similar to them, but secondarily they wish for people who also don't fit in with such broader culture/group, which is why diversity is pushed. The enemy of my enemy is my friend, if you will.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3978287&forum_id=2#36062228)

incels are insane, true. but consider the merits of their claims and the societal circumstances that produce incels.

she also seems to disregard hanson's article as "flippantly dehumanizing", but that phrase is meaningless. what does she think about the content?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3978287&forum_id=2#36062272)

she doesn't care about that

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3978287&forum_id=2#36062282)

don't any of these "writers" have any ambition or self-respect for their craft? why doesn't one of these feminists write about female incels or something? do these people have any original thoughts whatsoever?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3978287&forum_id=2#36062385)

you'd think someone would want to write something other than, "successful becky here, incels are misogynist losers!"

I understand that dismissive take on an outgroup, but why would a writer think that's worth babbling about?

that's what I really don't understand about these roastie writers: the question I have at the end of every single essay is, who the fuck cares? I'm not denying their "lived experience"--no doubt one time in junior high Chad made them insecure about being a Korean dork--the question is why the fuck am I supposed to want to read it? What fucking insight do their own feelings about their own lives offer me, the reader? Did these solipsistic cunts just decide "write what you know" means talk about the most banal, trivial bullshit literally from their daily lives, which appear to consist of mindlessly floating from brunch to women's studies class (we get it, we went to college too and know people wrote about the "male gaze" and all the rest) to tinder?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3978287&forum_id=2#36062680)

How do all these journalists miss that Hanson is against redistributing wealth too?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3978287&forum_id=2#36062599)

who are the REAL White Supremacist Cis-bigoted worshipers of Hegemonic Masculinity here, ladies? you write one thing, but you cast your vote with your vaginas.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3978287&forum_id=2#36067148)

lmao at me reaching Asian woman levels of misogynist white supremacism. I actually like and respect many asian men and don't actually believe slimepits can be purified by my nordic cock.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3978287&forum_id=2#36067198)