\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

U.S. Births Dip To 30-Year Low; Fertility Rate Sinks Further Below Replacement L

The birthrate fell for nearly every group of women of reprod...
Curious point hissy fit
  05/17/18
Good
Pearly underhanded lay
  05/17/18
Women in their 40s were the only group to see a higher birth...
puce marvelous cuckold boltzmann
  05/17/18
:(
drab rebellious library rigor
  05/25/18
Two-thirds of the drop is due to the amazing drop of teen pr...
sooty address
  05/17/18
I am a FIRM believer in a $5000/year tax credit for each kid...
massive heady ape
  05/17/18
Even better -- $15k deduction for each kid. That way you inc...
massive heady ape
  05/17/18
if you want to incentivize rich, just make it nonrefundable
Soul-stirring hell
  05/25/18
...
Provocative indigo range
  05/25/18
Lol it would take a lot more than that to persuade MC or UMC...
umber histrionic hall
  05/25/18
this implies that white births are a minority of the total. ...
startled set
  05/17/18
we're going to need more immigrants
mustard pozpig
  05/17/18
THANKS WOMEN'S MOVEMENT now they are all too busy demanding ...
frozen electric gunner goyim
  05/17/18
The only age group that had babies at a higher rate in 2017 ...
Soul-stirring hell
  05/25/18
Good. too many people. just can't follow with "well t...
internet-worthy overrated theatre
  05/25/18
Checking in with four toeheads.
House-broken Rehab
  05/25/18
Fewer people, cheaper real estate.
Dashing tank genital piercing
  05/25/18


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: May 17th, 2018 5:14 PM
Author: Curious point hissy fit

The birthrate fell for nearly every group of women of reproductive age in the U.S. in 2017, reflecting a sharp drop that saw the fewest newborns since 1978, according to a new report by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

There were 3,853,472 births in the U.S. in 2017 — "down 2 percent from 2016 and the lowest number in 30 years," the CDC said.

The general fertility rate sank to a record low of 60.2 births per 1,000 women between the ages of 15 and 44 — a 3 percent drop from 2016, the CDC said in its tally of provisional data for the year.

The results put the U.S. further away from a viable replacement rate – the standard for a generation being able to replicate its numbers.

"The rate has generally been below replacement since 1971," according to the report from CDC's National Center for Health Statistics.

The CDC calculates a "total fertility rate" by estimating how many babies a hypothetical group of 1,000 women would likely have over their lifetime. That measure now stands at 1,764.5 births per 1,000 women — a 3 percent drop from 2016. The replacement rate is 2,100 births per 1,000 women.

"The decline in the rate from 2016 to 2017 was the largest single-year decline since 2010," the CDC said.

The 2017 numbers also represent a 10-year fall from 2007, when the U.S. finally broke its post-World War baby boom record, with more than 4.3 million births.

Historically, the number of babies born in the U.S. has gradually risen since a sharp decline in the early 1970s. But that growth has been inconsistent, and over the same time frame, the birthrate has shown a general decline. The numbers are often subject to spikes and sudden dips, driven in large part by the country's economy, generational size and other factors.

In 2017, birthrates fell by 4 percent both for women 20 to 24 years old and for women 25 to 29, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

AGF/UIG via Getty Images

The birthrate fell for nearly every group of women of reproductive age in the U.S. in 2017, reflecting a sharp drop that saw the fewest newborns since 1978, according to a new report by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

There were 3,853,472 births in the U.S. in 2017 — "down 2 percent from 2016 and the lowest number in 30 years," the CDC said.

The general fertility rate sank to a record low of 60.2 births per 1,000 women between the ages of 15 and 44 — a 3 percent drop from 2016, the CDC said in its tally of provisional data for the year.

The results put the U.S. further away from a viable replacement rate – the standard for a generation being able to replicate its numbers.

"The rate has generally been below replacement since 1971," according to the report from CDC's National Center for Health Statistics.

The CDC calculates a "total fertility rate" by estimating how many babies a hypothetical group of 1,000 women would likely have over their lifetime. That measure now stands at 1,764.5 births per 1,000 women — a 3 percent drop from 2016. The replacement rate is 2,100 births per 1,000 women.

Article continues after sponsorship

"The decline in the rate from 2016 to 2017 was the largest single-year decline since 2010," the CDC said.

The 2017 numbers also represent a 10-year fall from 2007, when the U.S. finally broke its post-World War baby boom record, with more than 4.3 million births.

Historically, the number of babies born in the U.S. has gradually risen since a sharp decline in the early 1970s. But that growth has been inconsistent, and over the same time frame, the birthrate has shown a general decline. The numbers are often subject to spikes and sudden dips, driven in large part by the country's economy, generational size and other factors.

The numbers seem to correspond with what the Census Bureau and others have been predicting for years: America's population growth will increasingly depend on immigrants, after decades in which the U.S. enjoyed a relatively high fertility rate when compared with that of other developed countries.

As The Associated Press reports, the U.S. birthrate is "still above countries such as Spain, Greece, Japan and Italy, but the gap appears to be closing."

Broken out by age, the 2017 birthrate fell for teenagers by 7 percent, to 18.8 births per 1,000, a record low. That figure is for women from 15 to 19 years old. For that same group, the birthrate has fallen by 55 percent since 2007 and by 70 percent since the most recent peak in 1991, the CDC said.

Women in their 40s were the only group to see a higher birthrate last year. Between the ages of 40 and 44, there were 11.6 births per 1,000 women, up 2 percent from 2016, according to the CDC's provisional data.

Birthrates fell by 4 percent both for women from 20 to 24 years old and for women of ages 25 to 29.

For women in their 30s — a group that had recently seen years of rising birthrates — the rate fell slightly in 2017. The drop included a 2 percent fall among women in their early 30s, a group that still maintained the highest birthrate of any age group, at 100.3 births per 1,000 women.

For the third year in a row, both the preterm birthrate and the low birth weight rate rose. The CDC said that the 9.93 percent rise in preterm births was due to late preterm births and that the early preterm rate had not changed from 2016's 2.75 percent.

Low birth weight — defined as newborns that weigh less than 5 pounds, 8 ounces — rose slightly above the highest level previously recorded, with 2017's 8.27 percent topping 2006's 8.26 percent.

The overall cesarean delivery rate nudged upward in 2017, rising to 32 percent from 31.9 percent – still below the all-time high of 32.9 percent in 2009.

The CDC also tallied births by race and cultural data (but it doesn't yet have the data to compare those figures to the overall populations).

Here's how some of the 2017 numbers were reported:

All Races and Origins: 3,853,472

White: 1,991,348

Hispanic: 897,518

Black: 560,560

Asian: 249,214

American Indian or Alaska Native: 29,878

Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander: 9,418

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3979514&forum_id=2#36071566)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 17th, 2018 5:15 PM
Author: Pearly underhanded lay

Good

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3979514&forum_id=2#36071577)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 17th, 2018 5:15 PM
Author: puce marvelous cuckold boltzmann

Women in their 40s were the only group to see a higher birthrate last year.

Women in their 40s were the only group to see a higher birthrate last year.

Women in their 40s were the only group to see a higher birthrate last year.

Women in their 40s were the only group to see a higher birthrate last year.

Women in their 40s were the only group to see a higher birthrate last year.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3979514&forum_id=2#36071579)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 25th, 2018 5:36 PM
Author: drab rebellious library rigor

:(

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3979514&forum_id=2#36128154)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 17th, 2018 5:17 PM
Author: sooty address

Two-thirds of the drop is due to the amazing drop of teen pregnancies. It’s been a great thing for the country. We’re having less kids, but they’re less likely to be born to poor single teenage mothers. Lower quantity, higher quality.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3979514&forum_id=2#36071593)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 17th, 2018 5:17 PM
Author: massive heady ape

I am a FIRM believer in a $5000/year tax credit for each kid under 18.

Encourage people who (1) make money and (2) are somewhat sophisticated to have kids.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3979514&forum_id=2#36071600)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 17th, 2018 5:19 PM
Author: massive heady ape

Even better -- $15k deduction for each kid. That way you incentivize richer people even more.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3979514&forum_id=2#36071619)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 25th, 2018 5:29 PM
Author: Soul-stirring hell

if you want to incentivize rich, just make it nonrefundable

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3979514&forum_id=2#36128099)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 25th, 2018 5:39 PM
Author: Provocative indigo range



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3979514&forum_id=2#36128169)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 25th, 2018 5:38 PM
Author: umber histrionic hall

Lol it would take a lot more than that to persuade MC or UMC women to have 1 more kid than they otherwise would. You need about half a million per kid to incentive the non poor families to have 1 more than they otherwise would imo. 5K lol that's 1.5 months of daycare. Educated dual income couples' cost of raising a kid is probably closer to $1M. This is likely the demographic opting for 1 when society would be better off if they opted for 2.



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3979514&forum_id=2#36128160)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 17th, 2018 5:22 PM
Author: startled set

this implies that white births are a minority of the total. white mother = 51.7% of total, minus the 5% outbreeding rate means the percentage of non-hispanic white babies is ~46.7%.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3979514&forum_id=2#36071646)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 17th, 2018 5:31 PM
Author: mustard pozpig

we're going to need more immigrants

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3979514&forum_id=2#36071743)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 17th, 2018 11:25 PM
Author: frozen electric gunner goyim

THANKS WOMEN'S MOVEMENT now they are all too busy demanding EQUAL PAY to cop dat babby

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3979514&forum_id=2#36074532)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 25th, 2018 5:28 PM
Author: Soul-stirring hell

The only age group that had babies at a higher rate in 2017 was women in their early 40s, with those age 40 to 44 having 11.6 births per 1,000 women, up 2% from the prior year.

Jesus

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3979514&forum_id=2#36128096)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 25th, 2018 5:38 PM
Author: internet-worthy overrated theatre

Good. too many people. just can't follow with "well then we need more immigrants".

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3979514&forum_id=2#36128161)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 25th, 2018 5:42 PM
Author: House-broken Rehab

Checking in with four toeheads.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3979514&forum_id=2#36128188)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 25th, 2018 6:15 PM
Author: Dashing tank genital piercing

Fewer people, cheaper real estate.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3979514&forum_id=2#36128420)