What is the actual difference in safety between a Glock and a Sig P-series
| Heady Headpube Selfie | 05/26/18 | | Sable Diverse Juggernaut Filthpig | 05/26/18 | | Heady Headpube Selfie | 05/26/18 | | internet-worthy stirring resort dog poop | 05/26/18 | | Heady Headpube Selfie | 05/26/18 | | Lascivious wrinkle | 05/26/18 | | Heady Headpube Selfie | 05/26/18 | | Heady Headpube Selfie | 05/27/18 | | fighting magenta jew sanctuary | 05/27/18 | | Heady Headpube Selfie | 07/15/18 | | Vermilion balding plaza | 07/15/18 | | Heady Headpube Selfie | 07/15/18 | | Vermilion balding plaza | 07/15/18 | | Crawly 180 Black Woman Native | 07/15/18 | | Heady Headpube Selfie | 07/15/18 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: May 26th, 2018 1:24 PM Author: Heady Headpube Selfie
The Glock has various "safeties" (consisting of an external integrated trigger safety and two automatic internal safeties: a firing pin safety, and a drop safety) which do nothing to prevent an accidental discharge irl. Internet fanboys will tell you that it has a "safe action system" and that, "the fuckin' safety is between your ears, n00b."
The Sig with the hammer cocked has about a 1 lb. lighter pull and is otherwise just as safe/unsafe to carry as a Glock as far as I can tell. Both are drop-safe (everything sold new in 2018 is drop-safe), and both will go BANG if you pull the trigger. The Glock just has a useless tab hanging next to the trigger which realistically does nothing but MIGHT stop it from going off if something happens to grab the 1.25mm where it does not cover the trigger (maybe if it hung further forward, at say a 45 degree angle, it would be more useful?)
Still, the conventional wisdom among internet gunmos (proles with penises <7") is that carrying a Sig or a 1911 or a Beretta in CONDITION ZERO violates the manual of arms and is a bad idea, and indicative of stupidity. Meanwhile they think nothing of carrying a Glock in their pocket or inside their 42" waistbands, let alone with their GHOST trigger kit, lowering the trigger pull to ~3.5 lbs,0( making it far less safe than a condition zero 1911 which no one would ever carry in such a manner)
Open-carrying a Glock seems like it would be OKAY, like for a police officer or what have you, but the existence of the Glock 42, which can be pocket-carried and cannot be had with a manual safety, seems preposterous. Libs don't know how this shit works but if they did, there would be laws about the trigger weight on a carry piece with no manual safety.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3987061&forum_id=2#36131660) |
|
Date: July 15th, 2018 8:09 PM Author: Crawly 180 Black Woman Native
plenty of people have shot themselves in the leg because they carried in a shitty leather holster that folded into the trigger and pulled it while reholstering.
https://www.usacarry.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/glock_04.jpg
Kydex alleviates some of the risk, but not all of it. DA/SA is my preferred trigger but while I do carry an M&P Shield, it's the version with a thumb safety and I leave it on.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3987061&forum_id=2#36432760) |
|
|