\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

IG re Strzok: relentless biased comments, no proof of bias

wtf? how much motive of intent does it take for IG to conclu...
soul-stirring sinister alpha
  06/15/18
BUT WHAT ABOUT HIS MOTIVE
talented rigor
  06/15/18
...
Bearded floppy hospital generalized bond
  06/15/18
It's the bureau of investigations not the bureau of proper c...
amber potus
  06/15/18
...
massive people who are hurt
  06/15/18
At least this is out there and people are talking about it, ...
Poppy irradiated locale elastic band
  06/15/18
"although libs seem to believe in other situations that...
soul-stirring sinister alpha
  06/15/18
Fortunately we don't need to convince many deranged libs. An...
Poppy irradiated locale elastic band
  06/15/18
Tcr. These guys find bias and motivation everywhere but not ...
Swollen exciting area faggot firefighter
  06/15/18
...
Bronze High-end Den
  06/15/18
...
Orange parlor newt
  06/15/18
...
dull heady lettuce
  06/16/18
...
Federal Razzle Piazza
  06/19/18
What specifically did Strzok do in terms of either investiga...
talented rigor
  06/15/18
https://www.cnn.com/2017/12/04/politics/peter-strzok-james-c...
Poppy irradiated locale elastic band
  06/15/18
funny thing: the former term was literally the criminal stan...
soul-stirring sinister alpha
  06/15/18
Thinking, non-deranged people can see that, fortunately.
Poppy irradiated locale elastic band
  06/15/18
"and if the latter term doesn't mean (or entail) the sa...
Hyperventilating domesticated sanctuary wrinkle
  06/15/18
(guy who hasn't explained the distinction at all)
Poppy irradiated locale elastic band
  06/15/18
idk. Comey and Strzok live inside the world of legal standar...
soul-stirring sinister alpha
  06/15/18
The IG doesn't fault the charging decision. You can disagree...
talented rigor
  06/15/18
How about if it was a judgment call and his judgment was con...
Poppy irradiated locale elastic band
  06/15/18
for anyone with half a brain, it's obvious that Comey conclu...
soul-stirring sinister alpha
  06/15/18
No shit. At least she still lost despite their best efforts....
Poppy irradiated locale elastic band
  06/15/18
It wasn't ultimately Strozk's call, it was Comey's. Comey sa...
talented rigor
  06/15/18
CNN could be wrong about the distinction being of legal cons...
Poppy irradiated locale elastic band
  06/15/18
Then that is an absurdly dumb fucking reading of the law. D...
Chocolate Goyim Casino
  06/15/18
IG's mandate was to ascertain whether investigative decision...
Onyx Theater
  06/16/18
it doesn't matter. this is political gold for Trump.
galvanic wine boltzmann
  06/15/18
All anybody will remember is "we'll stop him"
appetizing son of senegal
  06/15/18
trump should be running ads nonstop showing his election nig...
hilarious meetinghouse
  06/15/18
...
Misanthropic goal in life toilet seat
  06/15/18
Okay poast this idea somewhere that someone who can make tha...
Poppy irradiated locale elastic band
  06/15/18
bump 4 charles
hilarious meetinghouse
  06/15/18
...
comical nubile digit ratio travel guidebook
  06/15/18
I’m certain we will be seeing much more of that quote.
appetizing son of senegal
  06/15/18
the election ads and campaigning next time are going to be 1...
flatulent burgundy crotch whorehouse
  06/16/18
...
Federal Razzle Piazza
  06/19/18
Let’s just hope the deep state is as free with the benefit o...
Disrespectful Antidepressant Drug
  06/15/18
LMAO suuuuuuure
appetizing son of senegal
  06/15/18
...
soul-stirring sinister alpha
  06/15/18
Lol at obstruction being Trumps concern
Violent aggressive regret double fault
  06/16/18
It's exactly like comeys public announcement where he roaste...
amber potus
  06/15/18
so Trump can be biased as fuck but the agencies he controls ...
nofapping juggernaut
  06/15/18
(brain-damaged PP's 97 IQ in overdrive)
Bronze High-end Den
  06/15/18
This is a promising angle for flame. I would hate to see you...
Green gaming laptop
  06/15/18
lol
comical nubile digit ratio travel guidebook
  06/15/18
Imagine you are a prosecutor, or even a civil shittigator, a...
Chocolate Goyim Casino
  06/15/18
...
amber potus
  06/15/18
cr this was a ham-handed attempt at damage control. like pat...
hilarious meetinghouse
  06/15/18
roll the guillotines
comical nubile digit ratio travel guidebook
  06/15/18
...
Bearded floppy hospital generalized bond
  06/15/18
...
Poppy irradiated locale elastic band
  06/15/18
Cr. You don’t need video surveillance to prove the point, th...
appetizing son of senegal
  06/15/18
...
Rambunctious brunch
  06/15/18
"Horowitz did a great disservice to this country by int...
Hyperventilating domesticated sanctuary wrinkle
  06/15/18
This wasn’t hearsay bullshit he said “sometime in his career...
appetizing son of senegal
  06/16/18
He’s a moderate, dont pick on him
Bearded floppy hospital generalized bond
  06/16/18
He’s goddamn ridiculous.
appetizing son of senegal
  06/16/18
Horrowitz was not addressing a "typical" argument ...
Chocolate Goyim Casino
  06/16/18
...
Rambunctious brunch
  06/16/18
...
Bearded floppy hospital generalized bond
  06/16/18
...
soul-stirring sinister alpha
  06/15/18
Lol at conTURDs
anal french chef
  06/15/18
Horowitz: actually there clearly was bias but we carefully l...
soul-stirring sinister alpha
  06/19/18
...
soul-stirring sinister alpha
  06/19/18


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 11:48 AM
Author: soul-stirring sinister alpha

wtf? how much motive of intent does it take for IG to conclude the obvious? short of Strzok sending a text "I declare that I am doing something improper because I hate Trump," the IG says no impropriety is absolutely proven. it is the IG equivalent of Wolf Blitzer's "we may never know why the jihadist quoting the Quran and screaming 'God is good' as he murdered non-Muslims did what he did."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36250973)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 11:51 AM
Author: talented rigor

BUT WHAT ABOUT HIS MOTIVE

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36250990)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 11:52 AM
Author: Bearded floppy hospital generalized bond



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36250999)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 11:52 AM
Author: amber potus

It's the bureau of investigations not the bureau of proper conclusions

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251000)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 12:44 PM
Author: massive people who are hurt



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251384)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 11:52 AM
Author: Poppy irradiated locale elastic band

At least this is out there and people are talking about it, and reading between the lines.

Its hard to prove that bias results in some action. But the bias is clear and the actions are clear, and the connection between them is not really provable without an admission (although libs seem to believe in other situations that they can easily tell that bias causes actions with minimal evidence, so....)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251002)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 11:54 AM
Author: soul-stirring sinister alpha

"although libs seem to believe in other situations that they can easily tell that bias causes actions with minimal evidence, so...."

agreed completely. but it's also an issue for all of us. when you see direct proof of passionate bias against someone, you naturally conclude it affects behavior -- except for jihadists and anti-Trumpers, apparently.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251022)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 12:00 PM
Author: Poppy irradiated locale elastic band

Fortunately we don't need to convince many deranged libs. And we have a champion who has a pretty fucking strong track record of standing up to their narrative. At this point, many people who were dead set against him are behind him simply because libs are so demonstrably unhinged.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251059)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 11:56 AM
Author: Swollen exciting area faggot firefighter

Tcr. These guys find bias and motivation everywhere but not here. Just lol

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251031)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 12:20 PM
Author: Bronze High-end Den



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251193)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 1:28 PM
Author: Orange parlor newt



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251694)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 16th, 2018 12:37 AM
Author: dull heady lettuce



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36254939)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 19th, 2018 1:21 PM
Author: Federal Razzle Piazza



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36272258)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 11:57 AM
Author: talented rigor

What specifically did Strzok do in terms of either investigation that you contend was improper?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251041)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 12:04 PM
Author: Poppy irradiated locale elastic band

https://www.cnn.com/2017/12/04/politics/peter-strzok-james-comey/index.html

Electronic records show Peter Strzok, who led the investigation of Hillary Clinton's private email server as the No. 2 official in the counterintelligence division, changed Comey's earlier draft language describing Clinton's actions as "grossly negligent" to "extremely careless," the sources said.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251089)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 12:09 PM
Author: soul-stirring sinister alpha

funny thing: the former term was literally the criminal standard that Comey had decided was not met. and if the latter term doesn't mean (or entail) the same thing, no one has explained why.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251112)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 12:12 PM
Author: Poppy irradiated locale elastic band

Thinking, non-deranged people can see that, fortunately.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251137)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 12:13 PM
Author: Hyperventilating domesticated sanctuary wrinkle

"and if the latter term doesn't mean (or entail) the same thing, no one has explained why."

They're not practicing lawyers. Lay people (including my clients) do that shit all the time assuming that terms and phrases are synonyms when under a particular statute or cases it can mean something entirely different. You can go ahead and attack the decision not to refer it for criminal prosecution, but who cares about the drafting process for Comey's statement.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251146)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 12:14 PM
Author: Poppy irradiated locale elastic band

(guy who hasn't explained the distinction at all)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251154)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 12:16 PM
Author: soul-stirring sinister alpha

idk. Comey and Strzok live inside the world of legal standards and it's part of what they've done every day for decades.

and Comey's big cash-out statement was the claim that no reasonable prosecutor would prosecute Hillary for the email debacle. how is that not a legal conclusion?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251168)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 12:17 PM
Author: talented rigor

The IG doesn't fault the charging decision. You can disagree with the exercise of prosecutorial discretion here but that's a far cry from improper investigation conduct.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251173)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 12:19 PM
Author: Poppy irradiated locale elastic band

How about if it was a judgment call and his judgment was controlled by demonstrated overwhelming bias to reach a certain conclusion?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251187)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 12:26 PM
Author: soul-stirring sinister alpha

for anyone with half a brain, it's obvious that Comey concluded that Hillary was too big for the law.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251248)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 12:28 PM
Author: Poppy irradiated locale elastic band

No shit. At least she still lost despite their best efforts.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251262)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 12:34 PM
Author: talented rigor

It wasn't ultimately Strozk's call, it was Comey's. Comey said he needed intentional or willful conduct to prosecute and had no evidence of that. It doesn't actually matter to his conclusion whether you call it careless or negligent because his read of the law, including past prosecutions, was that negligence isn't enough. And DOJ prosecutors weren't bound to follow Comey's recommendation.

Isn't this ultimately a legal disagreement about whether negligence can or should be indictable under this particular statute?

Couldn't Trump's DOJ indict Hillary anyway?

At some point this becomes insane deep state conspiracy mongering.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251306)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 1:05 PM
Author: Poppy irradiated locale elastic band

CNN could be wrong about the distinction being of legal consequence. Would you happen to have anything in support of your argument I could read?

It might be Comey's ultimate call, but we're talking about actions by Strzok that stink of coming from biased and not objective analysis.

Per the article above: The shift from "grossly negligent" to "extremely careless," which may appear pedestrian at first glance, reflected a decision by the FBI that could have had potentially significant legal implications, as the federal law governing the mishandling of classified material establishes criminal penalties for "gross negligence."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251537)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 1:39 PM
Author: Chocolate Goyim Casino

Then that is an absurdly dumb fucking reading of the law. DOJ *constantly* argues for extensions and/or application of the law to fit new fact patterns. True, no case had ever addressed the intentional hiding of a fucking server full of classified information in a bathroom closet.

In what universe would DOJ not prosecute a low level employee for doing this? They would take the case 100/100 times. The fact that every single element may not be a guaranteed slam dunk has never precluded them from aggressively going after people. She should have been prosecuted precisely because she was SOS. She obviously new better, and should be held to the strictest standard as a leader. Instead, a double standard was applied.

Trump's DOJ cannot prosecute Hillary because the OIG just white-washed the entire investigation. They aren't going to revisit it, nor should they at this point. It's over.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251786)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 16th, 2018 9:05 AM
Author: Onyx Theater

IG's mandate was to ascertain whether investigative decisions were defensible, not necessarily whether they were appropriate.



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36255506)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 11:54 AM
Author: galvanic wine boltzmann

it doesn't matter. this is political gold for Trump.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251019)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 11:58 AM
Author: appetizing son of senegal

All anybody will remember is "we'll stop him"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251043)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 12:23 PM
Author: hilarious meetinghouse

trump should be running ads nonstop showing his election night victory contrasted with the ominous biased FBI texts. everyone needs it beaten into their heads that the federal investigative agency was literally plotting to overturn the results of a free election in the united states.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251209)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 12:27 PM
Author: Misanthropic goal in life toilet seat



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251254)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 12:29 PM
Author: Poppy irradiated locale elastic band

Okay poast this idea somewhere that someone who can make that happen will see it.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251270)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 12:32 PM
Author: hilarious meetinghouse

bump 4 charles

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251295)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 12:42 PM
Author: comical nubile digit ratio travel guidebook



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251362)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 1:23 PM
Author: appetizing son of senegal

I’m certain we will be seeing much more of that quote.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251651)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 16th, 2018 12:37 PM
Author: flatulent burgundy crotch whorehouse

the election ads and campaigning next time are going to be 180^180.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36256167)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 19th, 2018 1:24 PM
Author: Federal Razzle Piazza



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36272283)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 11:58 AM
Author: Disrespectful Antidepressant Drug

Let’s just hope the deep state is as free with the benefit of the doubt when they investigate trump for obstruction.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251048)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 12:11 PM
Author: appetizing son of senegal

LMAO suuuuuuure

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251127)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 12:13 PM
Author: soul-stirring sinister alpha



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251139)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 16th, 2018 2:01 PM
Author: Violent aggressive regret double fault

Lol at obstruction being Trumps concern

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36256452)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 12:01 PM
Author: amber potus

It's exactly like comeys public announcement where he roasted Hillary for illegal activity for 15 minutes, in a speech anyone listening to would have seen it building toward indictment, and then at the end he concluded Hillary had no intent completely out of left field and so there was no crime

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251066)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 12:14 PM
Author: nofapping juggernaut

so Trump can be biased as fuck but the agencies he controls can't be? is that your argument Trumptards?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251158)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 12:26 PM
Author: Bronze High-end Den

(brain-damaged PP's 97 IQ in overdrive)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251238)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 12:40 PM
Author: Green gaming laptop

This is a promising angle for flame. I would hate to see you ruin it of the gates. Do you want to edit this to make your flame a little more subtle?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251356)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 12:42 PM
Author: comical nubile digit ratio travel guidebook

lol

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251367)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 12:50 PM
Author: Chocolate Goyim Casino

Imagine you are a prosecutor, or even a civil shittigator, and you have to prove an element of "bias." Then you come across the Strozk/Page texts, including the "we'll stop him" and "insurance policy" texts. On top of it, you see all of the FBI/DOJ working along side Strozk on the investigation are saying they fucking hate Trump, and his supporters are "retards."

I'd be parading those texts around the office celebrating how I just won the case. Outside of a literal admission, there will never be clearer or stronger evidence of bias.

Horowitz did a great disservice to this country by intentionally narrowing the inquiry to bias that could be tied to an individual investigative decision. That is a made up standard designed to white-wash. The issue is whether the people running behind the radar with great power are doing things fairly, professionally, and with some semblance of neutrality. Clearly not here.

Hell, even Mueller agreed. Three people have now been kicked off his team for this shit. How the fuck is DOJ able to reconcile that? They may think that this white-washing puts them back on the path towards repairing their credibility, but it does the opposite.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251429)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 1:07 PM
Author: amber potus



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251553)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 1:09 PM
Author: hilarious meetinghouse

cr this was a ham-handed attempt at damage control. like paterno saying mistakes were made but we're turning the page and putting procedures in place. not nearly good enough. it's plain to everyone what was really going on.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251571)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 1:15 PM
Author: comical nubile digit ratio travel guidebook

roll the guillotines

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251606)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 1:17 PM
Author: Bearded floppy hospital generalized bond



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251620)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 1:18 PM
Author: Poppy irradiated locale elastic band



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251626)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 1:25 PM
Author: appetizing son of senegal

Cr. You don’t need video surveillance to prove the point, there’s ample evidence in front of us already.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251678)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 2:16 PM
Author: Rambunctious brunch



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36252075)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 2:33 PM
Author: Hyperventilating domesticated sanctuary wrinkle

"Horowitz did a great disservice to this country by intentionally narrowing the inquiry to bias that could be tied to an individual investigative decision. That is a made up standard designed to white-wash."

No. It's addressing a typical argument raised by defense attorneys to win over juries and attack a prosecutor or cop's motivations. Maybe a cop used racist language sometime in his career. Maybe he was a racist and even had it in for the defendant. But, if there is no evidence that the investigation was improper, or that the evidence showing the defendant to be guilty of the crime was manufactured, then intelligent, objective people should conclude that the personal feelings of the investigator do not have bearing on the merits of the case. Mark Furman may have been a piece of shit, but I don't have any doubt that OJ did it.

Horowitz wasn't afraid to point out the improper behavior of agents and the lack of adherence to protocol in certain situations. But to say that invalidates all of the decisions that went into investigations is ridiculous. Our criminal justice system wouldn't survive such a standard.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36252237)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 16th, 2018 12:46 AM
Author: appetizing son of senegal

This wasn’t hearsay bullshit he said “sometime in his career,” he was talking about one of the two key subjects contemporaneous with investigating both subjects. Pull your head out of your ass.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36254963)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 16th, 2018 12:59 AM
Author: Bearded floppy hospital generalized bond

He’s a moderate, dont pick on him

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36255004)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 16th, 2018 9:07 AM
Author: appetizing son of senegal

He’s goddamn ridiculous.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36255512)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 16th, 2018 12:18 PM
Author: Chocolate Goyim Casino

Horrowitz was not addressing a "typical" argument made by defense attorneys about historical bias. Strozk et al were making these comments WHILE they were investigating both political parties. You see the difference? This isn't an issue of "dat cop is racist" because he said the n-word in 1979. They were talking about the actual targets of the investigations.

We have an FBI agent that is leading both investigations saying "we're going to stop Trump." By tying the bias issue to a *particular* "investigative decision," the IG created a standard that will never be met. Under this standard, Strozk would have to literally say something like "we're going to stop Trump, therefore I'm going to now subpoena the Trump organization to carry out this plan."

This is laughibly stupid. Compare what actually happened in the two investigations.

In one case, we have a person that was involved in potential criminal conduct (Hillary), because she built a fucking server in her house to store classified data. I.e., the evidence is real and was created as a result of Hillary's own doing. In the other case, the only evidence we have looks to be almost entirely concocted or manipulated by the government's "counter-intelligence" operation, and/or the DNC itself. So then we look at the sum total of Strozk and companies acts: at almost every opportunity they took the most narrow and lenient investigative path with Hillary, but did the opposite with Trump. And of course, these are all people working under an administration that is the same side as Hillary.

So yes, Horrowitz did a great disservice to the country. No one believes that these were fair and unbiased investigations. If the "standard" allows for a different outcome when it is so plainly obvious, then it is a dumb fucking standard.



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36256118)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 16th, 2018 12:27 PM
Author: Rambunctious brunch



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36256145)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 16th, 2018 1:53 PM
Author: Bearded floppy hospital generalized bond



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36256428)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 6:34 PM
Author: soul-stirring sinister alpha



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36253568)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 1:38 PM
Author: anal french chef

Lol at conTURDs

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251773)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 19th, 2018 12:16 AM
Author: soul-stirring sinister alpha

Horowitz: actually there clearly was bias but we carefully limited what we were talking about.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lVdXdtztxjk&feature=youtu.be

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36270028)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 19th, 2018 10:49 AM
Author: soul-stirring sinister alpha



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36271361)