Should Statutes of Limitations for Rape Be Abolished? Across the country, (nyt)
| Navy dysfunction | 06/19/18 | | jet site elastic band | 06/19/18 | | Exhilarant police squad | 06/19/18 | | shaky volcanic crater | 06/19/18 | | Soul-stirring Public Bath Mad-dog Skullcap | 06/19/18 | | Multi-colored bespoke corner foreskin | 06/19/18 | | shaky volcanic crater | 06/19/18 | | diverse plum tattoo | 06/19/18 | | shaky volcanic crater | 06/19/18 | | Cyan box office | 06/19/18 | | floppy flirting church building hominid | 06/19/18 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: June 19th, 2018 11:00 AM Author: jet site elastic band
I'm sympathetic to the first case she talks about, where there is absolutely a rape, and the police simply don't have a DNA match in the database yet to figure out who it was.
Of course that's not the situation that she is really concerned with.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4005459&forum_id=2#36271410) |
|
Date: June 19th, 2018 11:40 AM Author: Exhilarant police squad
I feel like some states allow a John Doe DNA profile to be indicted in a case where you have DNA but no match.
Of course, then you have people who think just because there is a 15 year statute of limitations, you should get that time to think about whether you want to “press charges.”
https://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_56cb4e5ee4b041136f17b087
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4005459&forum_id=2#36271605) |
Date: June 19th, 2018 11:30 AM Author: shaky volcanic crater
"in spite of persuasive evidence or a confession."
So draft an exception that rigorously defines and narrowly accommodates those situations, and I'll take a look at it.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4005459&forum_id=2#36271537)
|
|
|