Should Statutes of Limitations for Rape Be Abolished? Across the country, (nyt)
| stubborn passionate travel guidebook water buffalo | 06/19/18 | | umber histrionic church building party of the first part | 06/19/18 | | House-broken giraffe tanning salon | 06/19/18 | | frum resort ceo | 06/19/18 | | Yellow gay wizard parlor | 06/19/18 | | dashing crackhouse | 06/19/18 | | frum resort ceo | 06/19/18 | | swashbuckling violet sneaky criminal | 06/19/18 | | frum resort ceo | 06/19/18 | | bateful associate | 06/19/18 | | saffron haunted graveyard orchestra pit | 06/19/18 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: June 19th, 2018 11:00 AM Author: umber histrionic church building party of the first part
I'm sympathetic to the first case she talks about, where there is absolutely a rape, and the police simply don't have a DNA match in the database yet to figure out who it was.
Of course that's not the situation that she is really concerned with.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4005459&forum_id=2#36271410) |
|
Date: June 19th, 2018 11:40 AM Author: House-broken giraffe tanning salon
I feel like some states allow a John Doe DNA profile to be indicted in a case where you have DNA but no match.
Of course, then you have people who think just because there is a 15 year statute of limitations, you should get that time to think about whether you want to “press charges.”
https://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_56cb4e5ee4b041136f17b087
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4005459&forum_id=2#36271605) |
Date: June 19th, 2018 11:30 AM Author: frum resort ceo
"in spite of persuasive evidence or a confession."
So draft an exception that rigorously defines and narrowly accommodates those situations, and I'll take a look at it.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4005459&forum_id=2#36271537)
|
|
|