The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Got a motion in limine today without a single cite to a legal standard or casela
| trip confused haunted graveyard | 06/22/18 |
| Disrespectful exhilarant location antidepressant drug | 06/22/18 |
| Know-it-all International Law Enforcement Agency Patrolman | 06/22/18 |
| Orange Principal's Office | 06/22/18 |
| Snowy fighting pistol site | 06/22/18 |
| trip confused haunted graveyard | 06/22/18 |
| White beady-eyed forum weed whacker | 06/22/18 |
| cruel-hearted slippery field | 06/22/18 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: June 22nd, 2018 6:09 PM Author: trip confused haunted graveyard w in the argument. There is a legal standard section, but none of those rules show up in the argument.
I really don't know where to start. |
Date: June 22nd, 2018 6:10 PM Author: Disrespectful exhilarant location antidepressant drug attack the merits with your own case law and provide the standard and why plaintiff never met it, then mention plaintiff provided no legal reason for the relief sought. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4008306&forum_id=2#36293063) |
|
Date: June 22nd, 2018 6:12 PM Author: Know-it-all International Law Enforcement Agency Patrolman I make up my own law for MIL all the time. Usually win (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4008306&forum_id=2#36293070) |
|
Date: June 22nd, 2018 6:13 PM Author: Orange Principal's Office Alpha as FUCK (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4008306&forum_id=2#36293074) |
 |
Date: June 22nd, 2018 6:15 PM Author: Snowy fighting pistol site (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4008306&forum_id=2#36293095) |
|
Date: June 22nd, 2018 6:20 PM Author: trip confused haunted graveyard Yeah, this is hard. How do I rebut arguments they never made? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4008306&forum_id=2#36293113) |
|
Date: June 22nd, 2018 6:22 PM Author: White beady-eyed forum weed whacker This is most submissions by shitlawyers in state court.
I got a motion to quash and all there was was a document called "legal brief" which was the lawyer asserting facts that were not of record and with no legal cites.
Best part is the judge saw nothing wrong with it. |
|
Date: June 22nd, 2018 6:30 PM Author: cruel-hearted slippery field 98 percent of this stuff is standard and only is an issue for crucial disputed pieces of evidence. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4008306&forum_id=2#36293164) |