Why do people ignore the mountain of evidence RE: Fake Moon Landing
| Yellow partner | 06/24/18 | | contagious haunting depressive parlor | 06/24/18 | | Yellow partner | 06/24/18 | | Khaki Nibblets Spot | 06/24/18 | | Yellow partner | 06/24/18 | | Khaki Nibblets Spot | 06/24/18 | | Yellow partner | 06/24/18 | | Yellow partner | 06/24/18 | | brass reading party | 06/24/18 | | maize piazza | 06/24/18 | | dashing cuck station | 06/24/18 | | charismatic judgmental field roast beef | 06/24/18 | | Vivacious plaza yarmulke | 06/24/18 | | Yellow partner | 06/24/18 | | Vivacious plaza yarmulke | 06/24/18 | | House-broken Wonderful Nowag Old Irish Cottage | 06/24/18 | | Jet-lagged citrine chad death wish | 06/24/18 | | passionate hall | 06/24/18 | | glittery narrow-minded telephone address | 06/24/18 | | bearded site | 06/25/18 | | nubile salmon sweet tailpipe | 06/24/18 | | Jet-lagged citrine chad death wish | 06/24/18 | | nubile salmon sweet tailpipe | 06/24/18 | | crimson concupiscible dog poop | 06/24/18 | | Vivacious plaza yarmulke | 06/24/18 | | Khaki Nibblets Spot | 06/24/18 | | Vivacious plaza yarmulke | 06/24/18 | | Khaki Nibblets Spot | 06/24/18 | | nubile salmon sweet tailpipe | 06/24/18 | | Vivacious plaza yarmulke | 06/24/18 | | red dilemma ladyboy | 06/24/18 | | Cream curious pervert french chef | 06/24/18 | | Irradiated Lemon Shrine Hunting Ground | 06/24/18 | | brass reading party | 06/24/18 | | Yellow partner | 06/24/18 | | nubile salmon sweet tailpipe | 06/24/18 | | Poppy fiercely-loyal hominid office | 10/18/18 | | bat shit crazy ocher stead macaca | 06/24/18 | | nubile salmon sweet tailpipe | 06/24/18 | | laughsome idiotic principal's office | 06/25/18 | | vigorous stage incel | 06/24/18 | | thriller orchestra pit multi-billionaire | 06/24/18 | | bat shit crazy ocher stead macaca | 06/24/18 | | Yellow partner | 06/24/18 | | Khaki Nibblets Spot | 06/24/18 | | Yellow partner | 06/24/18 | | glittery narrow-minded telephone address | 06/24/18 | | Khaki Nibblets Spot | 06/24/18 | | glittery narrow-minded telephone address | 06/24/18 | | Khaki Nibblets Spot | 06/24/18 | | glittery narrow-minded telephone address | 06/24/18 | | Carmine Institution | 06/24/18 | | glittery narrow-minded telephone address | 06/24/18 | | Bearded locale | 06/24/18 | | glittery narrow-minded telephone address | 06/24/18 | | pearly embarrassed to the bone place of business | 06/24/18 | | charcoal property | 06/24/18 | | Fighting cruise ship | 06/24/18 | | glittery narrow-minded telephone address | 06/24/18 | | Drunken brunch | 06/24/18 | | Aqua House Kitty | 09/13/20 | | Carmine Institution | 06/24/18 | | nubile salmon sweet tailpipe | 06/24/18 | | Beady-eyed pit mother | 09/13/20 | | Bearded locale | 06/24/18 | | red dilemma ladyboy | 06/24/18 | | Bearded locale | 06/24/18 | | charcoal property | 06/24/18 | | red dilemma ladyboy | 06/24/18 | | Bearded locale | 06/25/18 | | Bearded locale | 06/24/18 | | coiffed preventive strike | 06/24/18 | | Yellow partner | 06/24/18 | | nubile salmon sweet tailpipe | 06/24/18 | | coiffed preventive strike | 06/24/18 | | Khaki Nibblets Spot | 07/16/18 | | hairraiser medicated parlour | 09/13/20 | | Harsh Mewling Church | 06/24/18 | | Yellow partner | 06/24/18 | | lake hyperventilating theatre | 06/24/18 | | turquoise bawdyhouse juggernaut | 06/24/18 | | Yellow partner | 06/24/18 | | razzle-dazzle umber theater athletic conference | 06/24/18 | | charcoal property | 06/24/18 | | Yellow partner | 06/24/18 | | razzle-dazzle umber theater athletic conference | 06/24/18 | | brass reading party | 06/24/18 | | Yellow partner | 06/24/18 | | nubile salmon sweet tailpipe | 06/24/18 | | nubile salmon sweet tailpipe | 06/24/18 | | lake hyperventilating theatre | 06/24/18 | | Khaki Nibblets Spot | 06/25/18 | | brass reading party | 06/25/18 | | Yellow partner | 06/25/18 | | contagious haunting depressive parlor | 06/25/18 | | Violent big library goal in life | 06/24/18 | | Olive generalized bond puppy | 06/25/18 | | Yellow partner | 06/25/18 | | confused chest-beating market | 09/13/20 | | brass reading party | 06/26/18 | | nubile salmon sweet tailpipe | 06/26/18 | | laughsome idiotic principal's office | 10/18/18 | | brilliant coffee pot main people | 09/13/20 | | Mauve gaping | 09/13/20 | | Zippy church building black woman | 08/28/23 | | Zippy church building black woman | 03/05/24 | | Zippy church building black woman | 03/29/24 | | Yellow partner | 03/29/24 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: June 24th, 2018 1:58 PM Author: passionate hall
Because someone would've broken and sold their story for $10 million. Or Russia or other scientists would've found evidence to expose it.
Don't get me wrong, aspects of it seem super fishy. But nothing seems fishier than it staying a secret for 50 years given the massive scale of it.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4009279&forum_id=2#36301598) |
|
Date: June 24th, 2018 2:18 PM Author: nubile salmon sweet tailpipe
extremely odd case.
"How many decades can pass, after all, without anyone coming even close to a reenactment before people start to catch on? Four obviously haven’t been enough, but how about five, or six, or seven? How about when we hit the 100-year anniversary?
If the first trans-Atlantic flight had not been followed up with another one for over forty years, would anyone have found that unusual? If during the early days of the automobile, when folks were happily cruising along in their Model T’s at a top speed of 40 MPH, someone had suddenly developed a car that could be driven safely at 500 MPH, and then after a few years that car disappeared and for many decades thereafter, despite tremendous advances in automotive technology, no one ever again came close to building a car that could perform like that, would that seem at all odd?"
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4009279&forum_id=2#36301677) |
|
Date: June 24th, 2018 2:32 PM Author: nubile salmon sweet tailpipe
we went six times while waging a massively expensive war in asia
six times. 50 years ago.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4009279&forum_id=2#36301718)
|
|
Date: June 24th, 2018 8:02 PM Author: nubile salmon sweet tailpipe
fake news.
its not just cost (obviously).
nasa will explicitly tell you we lack the capability.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4009279&forum_id=2#36303112) |
|
Date: June 24th, 2018 8:00 PM Author: nubile salmon sweet tailpipe
no longer exists for the russians or chinese?
btw nixon went six times. six (6).
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4009279&forum_id=2#36303101)
|
|
Date: June 24th, 2018 8:09 PM Author: glittery narrow-minded telephone address
"Imagine the US and Soviet Union realized at some point during the space race that the tech really wasn't there to successfully complete a moon mission"
Then they would keep improving the tech until it got there. It definitely wasn't there when the space race started. The whole thing was a series of one-upmanship.
"You really think the Soviet Union wouldn't jump at the chance to shut that shit down and save billions of dollars per year the second they had a publicly acceptable excuse to do so?"
No, they would just keep pushing until they won. After the moon landing the space race turned to space stations and shit like star wars.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4009279&forum_id=2#36303142) |
|
Date: June 24th, 2018 8:50 PM Author: Khaki Nibblets Spot
Just do keep pushing computer technology 20 years in the space of a few years
Just do improve rocket engine isp 3x to allow for the greater shielding needed to adequately protect the astronauts
Just do improve battery technology 10x to provide sufficient power for the computers/AC/communications/etc
All before 1970, of course
Look, if the tech wasn't there, it wasn't there, and a couple years of intense funding would not be sufficient.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4009279&forum_id=2#36303363) |
|
Date: June 24th, 2018 9:23 PM Author: glittery narrow-minded telephone address
Yep, stand by my q
Haven't taken one in the last few years (why would I?)
225 * 3
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4009279&forum_id=2#36303545) |
|
Date: June 24th, 2018 8:07 PM Author: Carmine Institution
This is all there is to it. Soviets conceded that we did it. No doubt, they had well-placed agents who would have exposed a faked landing.
Probably some secret American commies in NASA who would have been happy to help.
And the risk of exposure is so high that anyone smart enough to pull off what was alleged would be smart enough not to try
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4009279&forum_id=2#36303134) |
Date: June 24th, 2018 8:05 PM Author: charcoal property
Stanley Kubrick “directed” the Moon Landing and loaded the Shining with hidden messages about the fraud. There’s a documentary called Room 237 that explains it.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4009279&forum_id=2#36303124)
|
|
Date: June 24th, 2018 9:42 PM Author: nubile salmon sweet tailpipe
you on that retard time?
nixon doing a million fucking moon landings completely disproves the "uhhh its just too hard/expensive for anyone else to bother once in the next FIFTY FUCKING YEARS AS TECHNOLOGY GOT MASSIVELY BETTER"
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4009279&forum_id=2#36303656) |
|
Date: June 24th, 2018 10:40 PM Author: coiffed preventive strike
Awesome things we've stopped doing:
The Concorde
The Space Shuttle
SDI
Nuclear power (winding down)
-The problem isn't that it's too hard/expensive, the problem is that we've become a nation of risk-averse faggots that would rather spend billions of dollars on a hundred diversity deans at a public university than send a fucking human to another planet again
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4009279&forum_id=2#36303909) |
|
Date: June 24th, 2018 9:33 PM Author: nubile salmon sweet tailpipe
not just we---ask the russians or the chinese.
we cant do it. it is NOT a question of technology (which is orders of magnitude better today of course). gun to their heads, nasa could not get a man to the moon right now. they admit this. it is not "sure, give me a billion dollar rocket"--its "uhhh, well, we need to do more research, give me a 15 year window and maybe well solve the problems..."
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4009279&forum_id=2#36303603) |
Date: June 24th, 2018 10:12 PM Author: nubile salmon sweet tailpipe
Before moving on, I need to emphasize here just how sophisticated the lunar modules actually were. These remarkable spacecraft – and I understandably get a little choked up here talking about this, because I am just so damn proud of our team of Nazi scientists – managed to make six perfect take-offs from the surface of the Moon! And understand here people that they did that, amazingly enough, with completely untested technology!
You can’t duplicate the conditions on the Moon here at home, you see, or even provide a rough approximation. And since no one had ever been to the Moon, they didn’t know exactly what to replicate anyway, so this part of the mission was pretty much of a crapshoot. Conditions on the Moon are, to say the least, a bit different than here on Earth. The gravitational pull is only about 1/6 of what it is here. And then there is that whole ‘lack of atmosphere’ thing. And the decidedly unearthly temperatures. And then, of course, there are the high levels of space radiation.
I’m quite sure that we had the best minds available working on the Apollo project, but none of them could have accurately predicted and compensated for how all those unearthly conditions would combine to affect the flight potential of the lunar modules. So the ability of the modules to actually blast off from the Moon and fly was, at best, a theoretical concept.
It is also important to remember that, unlike the initial blast-off from Earth (seen above), which involved the collective efforts of thousands of people and the use of all types of peripheral equipment, the astronauts taking off from the Moon had only themselves and a strange vessel that looked like it had been salvaged from the set of Lost in Space. What would you be thinking, by the way, if you suddenly found yourself on the surface of the Moon with what looked like a cheap movie prop as your only way home? Would you feel comfortable hanging around for a few days doing experiments, confident that, when the time came, the untested contraption behind you would actually get you back home from the Moon? Or would the words “bad career choice” be running through your head?
But as it turns out, America kicked ass back then and those lunar modules performed like champions every single time! They didn’t even need any modifications! Despite the completely foreign environment, they worked perfectly the very first time and every time thereafter!
On Earth, it took many long years of trial and error, many failed test flights, many unfortunate accidents, and many, many trips back to the drawing board before we could safely and reliably launch men into low-Earth orbit. But on the Moon? We nailed that shit the very first time.
Today, of course, we can’t even launch a space shuttle from right here on planet Earth without occasionally blowing one up, even though we have lowered our sights considerably. After all, sending spacecraft into low-Earth orbit is considerably easier than sending spacecraft all the way to the friggin’ Moon and back. It would appear then that we can draw the following conclusion: although technology has advanced immeasurably since the first Apollo Moon landing and we have significantly downgraded our goals in space, we can’t come close to matching the kick-ass safety record we had in the Apollo days.
The thing is that, back in the frontier days, we didn’t need all that fancy technology and book-learnin’ to send Buzz and the boys to the Moon and back. Back then, we had that American can-do spirit and we just cowboyed up and MacGyvered those spaceships to the Moon. All we needed was an old Volkswagen engine, some duct tape and a roll of bailing wire. Throw a roll of butt-wipe and a little Tang on board and you were good to go.
And how about the speed with which we cranked out those Apollo spacecraft? Once we figured out how to make them, we were stamping them out like Coke cans. We fired off seven of them in just under three-and-a-half years, or about one every six months. Given the extreme complexity of those vessels, and the fact that every component had to perform flawlessly under largely unknown conditions, that is a pretty impressive production schedule. America, I think it is safe to say, totally rocked back then!
heres ur lunar module bros: https://airandspace.si.edu/sites/default/files/styles/slideshow_xlg/public/images/image-albums/99-15232h.jpg?itok=CqQ_B9qB
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4009279&forum_id=2#36303796) |
|
Date: June 26th, 2018 5:30 PM Author: nubile salmon sweet tailpipe
very sick and sad.
TRUMP is the one who will make space great (for the first time)
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4009279&forum_id=2#36314143) |
|
|