\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Wapo: "Pack the courts with libs" (lib fringe" movement from 2 weeks ago) (link)

Democrats must consider court-packing when they regain pow...
michael doodikoff
  07/10/18
https://www.roosevelt.edu/~/media/Images/Faculty/dfaris.jpg ...
THOT_RAVAGER
  07/10/18
they need to have a meeting and figure this shit the fuck ou...
beckersted.
  07/10/18
...
guy who gets it
  07/10/18
...
'"''"'"'
  07/10/18
...
.... -^^,--,~....
  07/10/18
they are fucked. the die has been cast. younger goyim k...
deus vult
  07/10/18
...
.,.,.:.,:,.:.,.,:.,.:.,:,.:.,:.,,..:,
  07/10/18
holy shit
Baron Mark von Ironside
  07/10/18
they gotta have a meeting. can any of you call a meeting? ...
beckersted.
  07/10/18
...
.... -^^,--,~....
  07/16/18
...
dha tux
  09/07/18
...
..,.,.,,,...,.,.,,,.,.,.,.,.,,
  07/10/18
...
.,.,.:.,:,.:.,.,:.,.:.,:,.:.,:.,,..:,
  07/10/18
...
DrakeMallard
  07/10/18
...
ESPRIT.wav
  07/17/18
https://twitter.com/SethAMandel/status/1027576201953648640
.... -^^,--,~....
  08/10/18
The face of evil.
Sir Incelot
  07/10/18
o what a representative of the majority
.... -^^,--,~....
  07/10/18
Is this John Oliver
CapTTTainFalcon
  07/10/18
oliver is a kike, too.
diabolical degenerate shooting his goon
  07/10/18
that's a 100% Oslomo face if i've ever seen one
anglican lawyer
  08/10/18
...
Wilbur Mercer, the supreme gentleman
  09/07/18
“Overturning either precedent would plunge the country into ...
90s | obese | jamaal
  07/10/18
...
guy who gets it
  07/10/18
...
Talk to Your Kids About Niggers
  07/10/18
"With majority will so regularly flouted, the public mi...
.;:..;:;.:.;.,,,.,.:,.;;,;;;..;,
  07/10/18
jesus
flip flop prole in first class
  07/10/18
WTF lol
cannon
  07/10/18
Curious how our government would work without judicial revie...
Boichester United
  07/10/18
i could accept this compromise ON THE CONDITION that everyth...
JFC
  07/10/18
This is why none of this means anything unless we get a fair...
Maori woman performing defiant haka
  07/10/18
it's called the filibuster. they were keen on it at times.
beckersted.
  07/10/18
I think that staggered 18 year terms is reasonable. But ...
michael doodikoff
  07/10/18
there's nothing the gop can put in place that a dem-controll...
"'""'"'''''''
  07/10/18
How is it that Obama alone can sign executive orders on immi...
...,...,.::..;,.,:,:,,..,::.,:,.,.:.:.,:.::.,
  07/10/18
It’s called DEMOCRACY bigot
Dr. Ford
  07/10/18
...
Metal Up Your Ass
  07/10/18
GET THIS BIGOT OFF OUR BOARD GET THIS BIGOT OFF OUR BOARD...
Dr. Cool
  07/10/18
...
tranny bathrooms
  07/10/18
...
JFC
  07/10/18
I believe this was before Trump said pussy.
Such anathema to us!
  07/19/18
Sounds like they're giving Trump the green light to add some...
Boichester United
  07/10/18
for real. appoint a justice each month.
TIGHTENDcbooker
  07/10/18
...
diabolical degenerate shooting his goon
  07/10/18
LOL. The Supreme Court is going the way of the Roman Senate....
''''"'"''"'''
  07/10/18
"the illegitimate Neil Gorsuch resigns" That's ...
~~(>' ' )>
  07/10/18
*conservative SCOTUS holds expansion statute unconstitutiona...
~~(>' ' )>
  07/10/18
...
Andrew Jackson's record of tremendous success
  07/10/18
lib here. Democrats will have no choice but to do this or we...
"'""'"'''''''
  07/10/18
?
michael doodikoff
  07/10/18
lol
Sir Incelot
  07/10/18
Why can’t libs just accept a loss once in a while? The sky i...
Mance Rayder
  07/10/18
...
cannon
  07/10/18
...
Sir Incelot
  07/10/18
titcr
.... -^^,--,~....
  07/10/18
why can't republicans? instead of holding a vote on Obama's ...
"'""'"'''''''
  07/10/18
Conservative domination is the new status quo
Dr. Ford
  07/10/18
Always someone elses fault
Maori woman performing defiant haka
  07/10/18
your comment makes no logical sense. the democrats would not...
"'""'"'''''''
  07/10/18
but when biden made the same argument it was fine
Maori woman performing defiant haka
  07/10/18
And Schumer by the way
Baron Mark von Ironside
  07/10/18
By forcing Sotomayor on America, Obama lost any presumptive ...
Moochelle Obongo
  07/10/18
"punish severely" "Agressors" &qu...
cannon
  07/10/18
this is why libs are finished
Moochelle Obongo
  07/10/18
Lmao "restoring the status quo" by adding justices...
cannon
  07/10/18
Obama failed to nominate someone palatable to Republicans (W...
Mance Rayder
  07/10/18
I'm sorry, how is packing the court restoring the status quo...
IronMonkey
  07/10/18
...
guy who gets it
  07/10/18
The Democrats haven't had a majority on the supreme court si...
><<(^((*>
  07/10/18
...
CHARLES DIGITAL
  07/10/18
...
"'""'"'''''''
  09/07/18
lifetime scotus is absurd.
nopayenogain
  07/10/18
libs (and jews) you will all fucking die.
diabolical degenerate shooting his goon
  07/10/18
very well-written and well-reasoned article
"'""'"'''''''
  07/10/18
my iphone actually played a lisping sound effect as i read t...
Moochelle Obongo
  07/10/18
...
Such anathema to us!
  07/19/18
All of these appeals to “democracy” being under attack overl...
..,;.,;.,.;;;..,;.;.,;,.,;.,;;,.,.;
  07/10/18
Agreed. Remember, liberals always project.
Baron Mark von Ironside
  07/10/18
...
guy who gets it
  07/10/18
Crre
Dr. Ford
  07/10/18
exactly. libs started this war in the 60s and 70s by politi...
JFC
  07/10/18
TRUMP IS DAMAGING OUR DEMOCRACY AND MAKING A JOKE OF THE CON...
GOTTA MOVE FAST
  07/10/18
(saracstic guy who thinks there's anything unconstitutiinal ...
"'""'"'''''''
  07/10/18
Good interview with the author: https://melmagazine.com/t...
"'""'"'''''''
  07/10/18
How do you see this playing out? Every time a political part...
~~(>' ' )>
  07/10/18
dems have a basis to do it. republicans dont. dont forget re...
"'""'"'''''''
  07/10/18
"dems have a basis to do it. republicans dont." ...
IronMonkey
  07/10/18
Stupid, actually.
Dr. Ford
  07/10/18
It is fair and reasonable for the Democrats to add enough ju...
><<(^((*>
  07/10/18
lol no
Maori woman performing defiant haka
  07/10/18
not going to happen. democrats are done trying to just level...
"'""'"'''''''
  07/10/18
democrats are out of power for the next two decades at least...
Moochelle Obongo
  07/10/18
...
.,.,.,,,.,,.,.,.,,.,.,.,.,.,,.,.,.,.
  07/10/18
Date: July 10th, 2018 2:34 PM Author: Julius Malema de...
Deep State8
  09/07/18
lol keep dreaming
tranny bathrooms
  07/10/18
Predict the Republican response.
~~(>' ' )>
  07/10/18
This is one of the stupidest, most infuriating articles I've...
Baron Mark von Ironside
  07/10/18
...
Jim_Kelly
  07/10/18
...
guy who gets it
  07/10/18
Outside of the classroom, you can probably catch me at a bas...
''''"'"''"'''
  07/10/18
oh jesus fuck just burn it all down
jonnyBlaze
  07/10/18
...
Jim_Kelly
  07/10/18
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l6pJucy8CU8
''''"'"''"'''
  07/10/18
lol, libs think tearing down civil society is going to make ...
Dr. Cool
  07/10/18
Roosevelt’s motives stemmed from the way that the conservati...
JFC
  07/10/18
HEY ITS OVERWHELMINGLY POPULAR TO SHOVE JEWS INTO OVENS WHY ...
DrakeMallard
  07/10/18
they wont be stopping that forever
deus vult
  07/10/18
...
michael doodikoff
  07/10/18
there's nothing unconstitutional about adding scotus justice...
"'""'"'''''''
  07/10/18
What if it's motivated by racial or religious animus? If ...
~~(>' ' )>
  07/10/18
Way to miss the point by literally 10 miles
JFC
  07/10/18
A constitutional amendment imposing term and size limits tha...
~~(>' ' )>
  07/10/18
cr
JFC
  07/10/18
...
don't run nigga i see you
  07/10/18
thats fine as long as dems restore the status quo either by:...
"'""'"'''''''
  07/10/18
1.status quo is before 1960 when the courts weren't a lib fa...
JFC
  07/10/18
Elections have consequences. You are not entitled to the st...
IronMonkey
  07/10/18
if elections have consequences and the consequence of the de...
"'""'"'''''''
  07/11/18
My objection is your operating assumption that the Court mus...
IronMonkey
  07/11/18
Muh STATUS QUO
Dr. Ford
  07/10/18
Nothing is going to be "restored." The best you...
~~(>' ' )>
  07/10/18
1800000
Dr. Ford
  07/10/18
LMFAO Before contemplating such unprecedented action, Dem...
.,.,.,,,.,,.,.,.,,.,.,.,.,.,,.,.,.,.
  07/10/18
yeah this part is dumb. offer them nothing. just do it.
"'""'"'''''''
  09/07/18


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 10:47 AM
Author: michael doodikoff

Democrats must consider court-packing when they regain power. It’s the only way to save democracy.

Saving the court's legitimacy requires breaking some norms.

By David Faris

July 10 at 6:00 AM

Brett Kavanaugh appears before the Senate Judiciary Committee in April 2004. (AP)

Justice Anthony Kennedy’s retirement from the Supreme Court, and President Trump’s nomination of Brett Kavanaugh to replace him, is the doomsday scenario liberals feared when Senate Republicans thwarted the appointment of Merrick Garland in 2016: The GOP’s brazen act of democratic sabotage will almost certainly deliver the high court to the far right for a generation. In the years ahead, the court will probably further erode reproductive rights, gay rights and voting rights, ushering in the darkest era in American history since the post-Reconstruction period.

Sounds hysterical, right? After all, Democrats will get their chance at reversing the court’s majority when they get back in power, as early as 2021. Except court appointments don’t work like elections. The remaining conservatives on the court are young — Clarence Thomas is the oldest at 70 — and Trump is insistent on naming young justices. It is possible that a two-term Democratic president could serve from 2021 to 2029 without being able to replace a single Republican-appointed justice.

That grim reality is leading many on the left to contemplate radical ideas, including an idea considered and discarded 80 years ago: court-packing. The idea of court-packing — adding extra justices to the Supreme Court in order to change its ideological makeup — causes most Americans to blanch. But if done right, it would actually offer a crucial avenue for safeguarding American democracy.

Court-packing has a dim reputation in American politics, largely because of a flawed understanding about President Franklin Roosevelt’s 1937 effort to pass a law authorizing the president to add a justice to the Supreme Court for every existing justice over the age of 70. His proposed bill would have allowed Roosevelt to add six justices to the court immediately, instantly transforming it.

Roosevelt’s motives stemmed from the way that the conservative-dominated court had thwarted his agenda — striking down several key New Deal measures during Roosevelt’s first term — in spite of historically large majorities in both houses of Congress and overwhelming popular support.

Roosevelt was frustrated by the lack of a vacancy — at the time he was the only president to have served a full term without getting to appoint a justice — that would allow him to tip the court’s balance. Worst of all was the looming prospect of his signature Social Security measure being swatted down by the court.

Rather than bide his time, Roosevelt hatched a secret plan to enlarge the court.

The usual story of what happened next goes something like this: Roosevelt supporters in the overwhelmingly Democratic Congress revolted and the court-packing scheme died. The plan was made redundant by the “switch in time that saved nine,” whereby a key swing justice began approving liberal measures, including a Washington state minimum-wage law identical to a New York statute the court had struck down just the year before.

Many scholars dispute this account. Some of the court’s votes for that term had already been taken internally by the time Roosevelt made his announcement in February, meaning that the scheme had little impact on their outcome. But the sense that Roosevelt’s gambit was ultimately unnecessary only adds to the widespread perception that he overreached, caused a constitutional crisis, stained his legacy and reduced his political capital.

Yet this familiar story obscures the real reason court-packing failed: Roosevelt’s refusal to compromise.

When Roosevelt first floated his plan, some potential allies balked at the ageist component of his proposal, while others worried about the sheer scale of the transformation. As scholar Barry Cushman has argued, Roosevelt repeatedly rejected entreaties from his backers to tone down the proposal. After he unveiled it, Vice President John Nance Garner and Democratic congressional leaders offered a compromise plan that would add two or three justices to the court. The president flatly refused.

Even after the court began upholding New Deal reforms, Senate Majority Leader Joe Robinson told the president’s adviser Joe Keenan that he could get the president “a couple of extra justices tomorrow” if Roosevelt would back off his maximalist plan. Roosevelt still resisted. The source of his defeat was not reflexive horror at the concept of court-packing per se — something that might render it a nonstarter forevermore — but Roosevelt’s inability to accept a less ambitious version.

Should Democrats gain unified control of government in 2021, they ought to consider this more complete story of court-packing. Before contemplating such unprecedented action, Democrats should offer Republicans a truce in the decades-long judicial wars: the illegitimate Neil Gorsuch resigns, and both parties support a constitutional amendment eliminating lifetime tenure on the Supreme Court, capping service at 18 years.

Routinizing court appointments would eliminate their zero-sum character and ensure that all presidents get to influence the future of jurisprudence, rather than relying on the randomness of retirements and deaths. Jimmy Carter didn’t get to fill a single seat on the Supreme Court in his four years in office — Donald Trump will soon have two in less than half a term. That unfairness, if left unaddressed, will eventually destroy the legitimacy of the institution itself.

And that’s why, if the offer falls flat, Democrats should move to implement exactly the sort of narrow court-packing plan that Roosevelt refused to accept. While unprecedented, court packing would be a clearly constitutional move by an elected majority. After all, previous presidents and Congresses have changed the size of the court.

It might sound drastic, part of the orgy of norm-violation that has defined the last decade. But it would help reverse something even more threatening to democracy: indefinite minority rule.

Since 1992, Democrats have won 30 million more votes for the U.S. Senate than Republicans. They have won the popular vote in six of seven presidential elections. But the Electoral College, the small-state bias of the Senate and the GOP’s potential dominance of the court have thwarted the will of the people.

In the past 50 years, including Trump’s appointment of Kennedy’s successor, Republicans have made 15 of the 19 Supreme Court appointments — almost 79 percent — despite controlling the presidency only 62 percent of the time. And with Democrats and Republicans increasingly appointing judges with radically different judicial philosophies, the Supreme Court must better reflect the outcome of presidential elections or risk a monumental public backlash. Only the accidental appointment of liberals by Richard Nixon, Gerald Ford and George H.W. Bush prevented a court crisis from arriving far earlier.

This disparity has left the Roberts court in a position to shatter the national consensus on, among other things, marriage equality and a woman’s right to choose, both of which enjoy 2-to-1 popular support. Overturning either precedent would plunge the country into a dangerous crisis with no easy way out. This new, hard-right majority might go even further and dismantle the legal foundations of minimum-wage laws, or (theoretically) overturn a Medicare-for-all statute in a post-Trump Democratic administration.

With majority will so regularly flouted, the public might eventually demand an end to judicial review altogether.

The country can ill-afford a Supreme Court thwarting the public’s will indefinitely. Yet Republicans seem bent on pressing their ideological advantage with absolutely no consideration given to the possibility of appointing a consensus candidate to the court. For that, they must, and will, pay a steep price.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36396932)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 10:50 AM
Author: THOT_RAVAGER

https://www.roosevelt.edu/~/media/Images/Faculty/dfaris.jpg

pic of the author

hmmmm

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36396955)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 10:53 AM
Author: beckersted.

they need to have a meeting and figure this shit the fuck out because i know they know they are flying too close to the sun.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36396969)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 11:26 AM
Author: guy who gets it (donny)



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36397201)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 11:31 AM
Author: '"''"'"'



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36397237)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 1:02 PM
Author: .... -^^,--,~....



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36397762)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 2:20 PM
Author: deus vult (from constantinople to the stars)

they are fucked.

the die has been cast. younger goyim know.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36398453)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 2:37 PM
Author: .,.,.:.,:,.:.,.,:.,.:.,:,.:.,:.,,..:,




(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36398608)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 2:20 PM
Author: Baron Mark von Ironside

holy shit

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36398460)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 2:31 PM
Author: beckersted.

they gotta have a meeting. can any of you call a meeting?

"Dave, you gotta stop this shit with the fucking thing..."

'well, i'm worried about the constit...'

"SHUT THE FUCK UP, DAVE. *snaps fingers a bit* Jake, do you have a job for this guy?" No, but I can make something up. "OK. Dave, you don't write fucking shit anymore. You work for Jake...Jake wadda you do again?" I sell rugs. "Right right, rugs, persian rugs, the fucking best. Dave, that's what the fuck it is you do now. You sell fucking rugs. I will even chip in to make 20% more than you did before with this bullshit. You'll love it, you even get to go to Azerbijian once a year. it's great."

'i don't really feel like...'

"YOU ARE NOT GOING TO FUCK THIS UP, YOU FUCKING FAGGOT. THIS IS THE ONLY PLACE WE GOT. YOU DONT GET TO FUCK IT UP WITH STUPID FUCKING SHIT"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36398562)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 16th, 2018 11:55 PM
Author: .... -^^,--,~....



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36442031)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 7th, 2018 1:53 PM
Author: dha tux ( )



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36764022)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 2:26 PM
Author: ..,.,.,,,...,.,.,,,.,.,.,.,.,,




(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36398519)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 2:37 PM
Author: .,.,.:.,:,.:.,.,:.,.:.,:,.:.,:.,,..:,




(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36398603)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 2:37 PM
Author: DrakeMallard (Let's get dangerous)



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36398611)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 17th, 2018 12:00 AM
Author: ESPRIT.wav (uspo)



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36442058)



Reply Favorite

Date: August 10th, 2018 6:03 PM
Author: .... -^^,--,~....

https://twitter.com/SethAMandel/status/1027576201953648640

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36594872)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 11:38 AM
Author: Sir Incelot

The face of evil.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36397288)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 1:02 PM
Author: .... -^^,--,~....

o what a representative of the majority

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36397759)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 1:09 PM
Author: CapTTTainFalcon

Is this John Oliver

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36397798)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 1:36 PM
Author: diabolical degenerate shooting his goon

oliver is a kike, too.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36398029)



Reply Favorite

Date: August 10th, 2018 6:06 PM
Author: anglican lawyer (<---)

that's a 100% Oslomo face if i've ever seen one

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36594907)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 7th, 2018 10:07 AM
Author: Wilbur Mercer, the supreme gentleman (Short Pride World Wide)



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36762403)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 10:52 AM
Author: 90s | obese | jamaal

“Overturning either precedent would plunge the country into a dangerous crisis with no easy way out.”

Except for, you know, legislatures enacting law instead of judges.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36396963)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 11:26 AM
Author: guy who gets it (donny)



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36397199)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 5:49 PM
Author: Talk to Your Kids About Niggers ( )



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36400002)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 10:52 AM
Author: .;:..;:;.:.;.,,,.,.:,.;;,;;;..;,


"With majority will so regularly flouted, the public might eventually demand an end to judicial review altogether."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36396964)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 10:54 AM
Author: flip flop prole in first class (ggtp)

jesus

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36396987)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 11:39 AM
Author: cannon

WTF lol

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36397295)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 11:42 AM
Author: Boichester United

Curious how our government would work without judicial review. Appeals only on the facts of cases? Good luck with that, libs, I'm sure the result will be laws more in line with "majority will".

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36397314)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 3:13 PM
Author: JFC

i could accept this compromise ON THE CONDITION that everything previously struck down as unconsitutional is fair game again. no striking down bullshit campaign finance laws but also no striking down congressional term limits, abortion laws, no bullshit 1-man 1-vote, bullshit miranda rights,etc

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36398923)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 10:55 AM
Author: Maori woman performing defiant haka

This is why none of this means anything unless we get a fairly airtight anti-packing plan in place asap

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36396996)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 10:56 AM
Author: beckersted.

it's called the filibuster. they were keen on it at times.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36397003)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 11:29 AM
Author: michael doodikoff

I think that staggered 18 year terms is reasonable.

But lol at libs not trying to instead start a civil war by resorting to banana republic power grabs

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36397225)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 11:41 AM
Author: "'""'"'''''''


there's nothing the gop can put in place that a dem-controlled congress and potus can't undo with the stroke of a pen

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36397307)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 1:10 PM
Author: ...,...,.::..;,.,:,:,,..,::.,:,.,.:.:.,:.::.,


How is it that Obama alone can sign executive orders on immigration, healthcare, and everything else under the sun that can't be undone by Congress and the president

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36397806)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 1:23 PM
Author: Dr. Ford

It’s called DEMOCRACY bigot

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36397897)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 2:43 PM
Author: Metal Up Your Ass



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36398654)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 2:45 PM
Author: Dr. Cool

GET THIS BIGOT OFF OUR BOARD

GET THIS BIGOT OFF OUR BOARD

GET THIS BIGOT OFF OUR BOARD

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36398674)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 2:53 PM
Author: tranny bathrooms



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36398768)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 3:10 PM
Author: JFC



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36398901)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 19th, 2018 3:22 AM
Author: Such anathema to us! (as The Americans)

I believe this was before Trump said pussy.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36457601)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 11:28 AM
Author: Boichester United

Sounds like they're giving Trump the green light to add some more justices since libs are going to do it anyway. Sounds okay to me!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36397216)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 11:42 AM
Author: TIGHTENDcbooker

for real. appoint a justice each month.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36397309)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 1:37 PM
Author: diabolical degenerate shooting his goon



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36398035)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 11:36 AM
Author: ''''"'"''"'''


LOL. The Supreme Court is going the way of the Roman Senate. Lower standards, add seats to meet your political fancy. Should be a fun watch.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36397281)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 11:37 AM
Author: ~~(>' ' )>

"the illegitimate Neil Gorsuch resigns"

That's not going to happen.

Focus on the 18-year cap, which is reasonable.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36397287)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 11:39 AM
Author: ~~(>' ' )>

*conservative SCOTUS holds expansion statute unconstitutional*

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36397297)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 4:04 PM
Author: Andrew Jackson's record of tremendous success



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36399300)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 11:40 AM
Author: "'""'"'''''''


lib here. Democrats will have no choice but to do this or we (their voters) will punish them severely.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36397299)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 11:41 AM
Author: michael doodikoff

?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36397308)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 11:42 AM
Author: Sir Incelot

lol

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36397310)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 11:43 AM
Author: Mance Rayder (/s/ Mance Rayder)

Why can’t libs just accept a loss once in a while? The sky is always falling when they don’t get their way for once.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36397321)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 11:46 AM
Author: cannon



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36397340)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 12:03 PM
Author: Sir Incelot



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36397416)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 1:05 PM
Author: .... -^^,--,~....

titcr

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36397781)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 1:21 PM
Author: "'""'"'''''''


why can't republicans? instead of holding a vote on Obama's nominee they hijacked the seat. libs aren't the aggressors here. all they're talking about doing is restoring the status quo. GOP are the ones who went for the power grab.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36397876)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 1:22 PM
Author: Dr. Ford

Conservative domination is the new status quo

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36397888)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 2:14 PM
Author: Maori woman performing defiant haka

Always someone elses fault

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36398391)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 2:26 PM
Author: "'""'"'''''''


your comment makes no logical sense. the democrats would not be seriously considering court-packing if not for the GOP power grab re: refusing to hold a vote on any Obama scotus appointee. That represented a significant and unprecedented escalation in partisan politics and it puts the democrats in a position where they have to retaliate to restore the status quo.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36398513)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 2:28 PM
Author: Maori woman performing defiant haka

but when biden made the same argument it was fine

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36398534)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 2:32 PM
Author: Baron Mark von Ironside

And Schumer by the way

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36398570)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 2:30 PM
Author: Moochelle Obongo

By forcing Sotomayor on America, Obama lost any presumptive right he had to nominate SCOTUS Justices.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36398556)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 2:34 PM
Author: cannon

"punish severely"

"Agressors"

"retaliate"

"ATTACK and PUNISH"

Jfc chill out

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36398579)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 2:35 PM
Author: Moochelle Obongo

this is why libs are finished

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36398589)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 2:22 PM
Author: cannon

Lmao "restoring the status quo" by adding justices for the first time in 150 years

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36398476)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 6:52 PM
Author: Mance Rayder (/s/ Mance Rayder)

Obama failed to nominate someone palatable to Republicans (Wilkinson, Sutton, or other judicial moderates), or someone who moderate Republicans would be forced to support for electoral reasons (Watford or another minority). He nominated a FUCKING WHITE MALE and blew it. Accept for once that Obama is capable of error.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36400512)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 7:03 PM
Author: IronMonkey

I'm sorry, how is packing the court restoring the status quo, exactly? This has got to be flame, right?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36400599)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 2:16 PM
Author: guy who gets it (donny)



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36398409)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 2:20 PM
Author: ><<(^((*> (0x9219DDFD2869edABd47A8e905e87d76e42C712da)

The Democrats haven't had a majority on the supreme court since the late 1960s.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36398454)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 7:05 PM
Author: CHARLES DIGITAL (CharlesXII)



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36400610)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 7th, 2018 10:01 AM
Author: "'""'"'''''''




(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36762364)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 11:45 AM
Author: nopayenogain

lifetime scotus is absurd.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36397329)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 1:06 PM
Author: diabolical degenerate shooting his goon

libs (and jews) you will all fucking die.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36397784)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 1:27 PM
Author: "'""'"'''''''


very well-written and well-reasoned article

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36397938)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 2:31 PM
Author: Moochelle Obongo

my iphone actually played a lisping sound effect as i read this

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36398567)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 19th, 2018 3:24 AM
Author: Such anathema to us! (as The Americans)



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36457603)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 2:08 PM
Author: ..,;.,;.,.;;;..,;.;.,;,.,;.,;;,.,.;


All of these appeals to “democracy” being under attack overlook the fundamental conservative judicial philosophy that the constitution doesn’t say anything at all about these culture war issues and they thus should be resolved through the legislative process - i.e. democracy.

Liberal justices have created this predicament by reading any policy decision they desire into the constitution, not anticipating that this would enable future conservative Justices to do the exact same thing, such as by reading a fetus’ right to life as a fundamental constitutional right (which has about as much support in the constitution itself - none - as the right to abort).

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36398343)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 2:16 PM
Author: Baron Mark von Ironside

Agreed.

Remember, liberals always project.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36398404)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 2:17 PM
Author: guy who gets it (donny)



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36398419)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 2:21 PM
Author: Dr. Ford

Crre

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36398468)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 3:09 PM
Author: JFC

exactly.

libs started this war in the 60s and 70s by politicizing the courts.

when cons started fighting back by appointing judges who pared back the pot-fueled excesses of the warren and burger courts, libs started screaming murder

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36398895)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 2:16 PM
Author: GOTTA MOVE FAST

TRUMP IS DAMAGING OUR DEMOCRACY AND MAKING A JOKE OF THE CONSTITUTION AND THE RULE OF LAW

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36398405)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 2:27 PM
Author: "'""'"'''''''


(saracstic guy who thinks there's anything unconstitutiinal or illegal about court-packing)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36398523)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 2:19 PM
Author: "'""'"'''''''


Good interview with the author:

https://melmagazine.com/the-professor-who-wants-to-inspire-a-new-generation-of-dirty-democrats-afa2c36aa527

THIS is the strategy Democrats need to be following, not the tired Schumer/Pelosi civility bullshit that hasnt worked for decades

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36398439)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 3:09 PM
Author: ~~(>' ' )>

How do you see this playing out? Every time a political party controls the executive and legislative branches, it adds SCOTUS seats? How many?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36398892)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 5:43 PM
Author: "'""'"'''''''


dems have a basis to do it. republicans dont. dont forget republicans lost two seats in the senate in 2016 after they hijacked the garland seat. the problem is 2/3 of the senate wasnt up for reelection so republicans still maintained a narrow majority.

also, dems can pass legislation to require automatic voter registration and, at the federal level, outlaw state-level ID laws which are intended to suppress minority vote. they can either do away with them completely or replace them with a federal system.



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36399966)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 7:06 PM
Author: IronMonkey

"dems have a basis to do it. republicans dont."

I can't tell if you're flaming or delusional.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36400622)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 7:11 PM
Author: Dr. Ford

Stupid, actually.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36400660)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 2:22 PM
Author: ><<(^((*> (0x9219DDFD2869edABd47A8e905e87d76e42C712da)

It is fair and reasonable for the Democrats to add enough judges to have a one vote majority, so long as they restore the Senatorial filibuster for Supreme Court nominees. That would get us back to where we would have been if Merrick Garland had been put up for vote.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36398484)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 2:26 PM
Author: Maori woman performing defiant haka

lol no

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36398515)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 2:30 PM
Author: "'""'"'''''''


not going to happen. democrats are done trying to just level the playing field. they're tired of republicans constantly rigging the game to effectuate minority rule. The crop of Democrats that will replace Schumer/Pelosi are united in their focus of finding ways to ATTACK and PUNSH Republicans for their transgressions toward the majority.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36398549)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 2:34 PM
Author: Moochelle Obongo

democrats are out of power for the next two decades at least, hth

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36398580)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 11:17 PM
Author: .,.,.,,,.,,.,.,.,,.,.,.,.,.,,.,.,.,.




(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36402434)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 7th, 2018 10:10 AM
Author: Deep State8

Date: July 10th, 2018 2:34 PM

Author: Julius Malema

democrats are out of power for the next two decades at least, hth

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36398580)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36762431)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 2:39 PM
Author: tranny bathrooms

lol keep dreaming

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36398620)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 3:09 PM
Author: ~~(>' ' )>

Predict the Republican response.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36398898)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 2:37 PM
Author: Baron Mark von Ironside

This is one of the stupidest, most infuriating articles I've read in a long time.

As one point of contention, the author does understand that the US Senate was SPECIFICALLY designed to give smaller states power, and accordingly an argument that there have been more democrat votes for senate candidates in 30 years than republican votes is a meaningless comment, and the framers would say that the senate exists for the sole purpose of checking that majority, regional rule.

In addition, in huge states where results are a foregone conclusion, like California, you can have severely depressed Republican turnout, such that just adding up the votes isn't the best way to go about it, nor does it make sense to aggregate +/- gaps over many elections.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36398610)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 3:11 PM
Author: Jim_Kelly



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36398908)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 5:44 PM
Author: guy who gets it (donny)



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36399969)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 2:40 PM
Author: ''''"'"''"'''


Outside of the classroom, you can probably catch me at a baseball game, writing op-eds, playing Texas Hold ‘Em, making stews, seeing a concert, toying with my fantasy baseball teams, riding my bike around town, galavanting around the world, or spending my spare money on food with my amazing wife, partner and inspiration, Sheerine Alemzadeh. Please check out her organization, Healing To Action, a worker-led movement to end gender-based violence, and consider donating.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36398631)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 2:50 PM
Author: jonnyBlaze

oh jesus fuck just burn it all down

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36398734)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 3:11 PM
Author: Jim_Kelly



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36398906)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 2:41 PM
Author: ''''"'"''"'''


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l6pJucy8CU8

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36398641)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 2:44 PM
Author: Dr. Cool

lol, libs think tearing down civil society is going to make liberalism spread?

all of these polite norms and institutions are the only thing keeping you retards alive

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36398666)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 3:04 PM
Author: JFC

Roosevelt’s motives stemmed from the way that the conservative-dominated court had thwarted his agenda — striking down several key New Deal measures during Roosevelt’s first term — in spite of historically large majorities in both houses of Congress and overwhelming popular support.

this (((guy))) doesnt seem to get what the point of having a constitution is

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36398865)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 3:13 PM
Author: DrakeMallard (Let's get dangerous)

HEY ITS OVERWHELMINGLY POPULAR TO SHOVE JEWS INTO OVENS WHY ARE THE COURTS THWARTING OUR AGENDA

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36398920)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 4:05 PM
Author: deus vult (from constantinople to the stars)

they wont be stopping that forever

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36399306)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 3:16 PM
Author: michael doodikoff



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36398939)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 5:46 PM
Author: "'""'"'''''''


there's nothing unconstitutional about adding scotus justices

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36399981)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 6:49 PM
Author: ~~(>' ' )>

What if it's motivated by racial or religious animus?

If that doesn't work, maybe the relevant statutes and rules will need to be construed strictly, as opposed to allowing substantial compliance.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36400493)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 7:00 PM
Author: JFC

Way to miss the point by literally 10 miles

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36400562)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 3:25 PM
Author: ~~(>' ' )>

A constitutional amendment imposing term and size limits that is ratified before November 2024 and takes effect in February 2025 is the way to go.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36399021)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 5:23 PM
Author: JFC

cr

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36399824)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 5:27 PM
Author: don't run nigga i see you (and icu)



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36399857)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 5:48 PM
Author: "'""'"'''''''


thats fine as long as dems restore the status quo either by: 1) adding two justices, or 2) removing illegitimate justice gorsuch via the impeachment process.

i like the author's idea about offering republicans a truce fist though

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36399997)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 6:24 PM
Author: JFC

1.status quo is before 1960 when the courts weren't a lib fantasy playground

2. truce fist

truce fist

truce fist

truce fist

truce fist

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36400302)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 7:11 PM
Author: IronMonkey

Elections have consequences. You are not entitled to the status quo ante.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36400661)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 11th, 2018 9:59 AM
Author: "'""'"'''''''


if elections have consequences and the consequence of the dems being voted back in is that the balance of scotus gets restored to what it would have been had the republicans not hijacked the seat then what exactly is your objection?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36404093)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 11th, 2018 10:24 AM
Author: IronMonkey

My objection is your operating assumption that the Court must never deviate from its composition as of early 2016.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36404277)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 7:12 PM
Author: Dr. Ford

Muh STATUS QUO

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36400665)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 10:46 PM
Author: ~~(>' ' )>

Nothing is going to be "restored."

The best you can hope for is for people to recognize their interest in avoiding perpetual packing fights and commit to an outcome before it's clear which party will benefit.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36402205)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 7:11 PM
Author: Dr. Ford

1800000

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36400664)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2018 11:11 PM
Author: .,.,.,,,.,,.,.,.,,.,.,.,.,.,,.,.,.,.


LMFAO

Before contemplating such unprecedented action, Democrats should offer Republicans a truce in the decades-long judicial wars: the illegitimate Neil Gorsuch resigns, and both parties support a constitutional amendment eliminating lifetime tenure on the Supreme Court, capping service at 18 years.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36402401)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 7th, 2018 10:06 AM
Author: "'""'"'''''''


yeah this part is dumb. offer them nothing. just do it.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4022100&forum_id=2#36762400)