Reply FavoriteEdit Your Message

Date: July 13th, 2018 2:51 PM

Author: .,.,...,..,.,.,:,,:,.,.,:::,....,:,..,:.:.,:.::,

http://archive.is/phVpT

Women retain and carry living DNA from every man with whom they have sexual intercourse, according to a new study by the University of Seattle and the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center.

The study, which discovered the startling information by accident, was originally trying to determine if women who have been pregnant with a son might be more predisposed to certain neurological diseases that occur more frequently in males.

But as the scientists picked apart the female brain, the study began to veer wildly off course. As it turns out, the female brain is even more mysterious than we previously thought.

The study found that female brains often harbor “male microchimerism“, or in other words, the presence of male DNA that originated from another individual, and are genetically distinct from the cells that make up the rest of the woman.

According to the study: “63% of the females (37 of 59) tested harbored male microchimerism in the brain. Male microchimerism was present in multiple brain regions.”

So 63% of women carry male DNA cells that live in their brains. Obviously the researchers wanted to know where the male DNA came from.

Anyone care to guess? From the women’s fathers? No. Your father’s DNA combines with your mother’s to create your unique DNA. So where else could it come from?

Through the study the researchers assumed that the most likely answer was that all male DNA found living in the female brain came from a male pregnancy. That was the safe, politically correct assumption. But these researchers were living in denial.

Because when they autopsied the brains of women who had never even been pregnant, let alone with a male child, they STILL found male DNA cells prevalent in the female brain.

At this point the scientists didn’t know what the hell was going on. Confused, they did their best to hide the evidence until they could understand and explain it. They buried it in numerous sub studies and articles, but if you sift through them all you will find the damning statement, the one line that gives the game away and explains exactly where these male DNA cells come from.

What are they so afraid of?

“CONCLUSIONS: Male microchimerism was not infrequent in women without sons. Besides known pregnancies, other possible sources of male microchimerism include unrecognized spontaneous abortion, vanished male twin, an older brother transferred by the maternal circulation, or SEXUAL INTERCOURSE. Male microchimerism was significantly more frequent and levels were higher in women with induced abortion than in women with other pregnancy histories. Further studies are needed to determine specific origins of male microchimerism in women.“

So according to the scientists, the possible sources of the male DNA cells living in the women’s brains are:

an abortion the woman didn’t know about

a male twin that vanished

an older brother transferred by the maternal circulation

sexual intercourse

Considering the fact that 63% of women have male DNA cells residing in the recesses of their brain, which of the above possibilities do you think is the most likely origin of the male DNA?

The first three options apply to a very small percentage of women. They couldn’t possibly account for the 63% figure. The fourth option? It’s rather more common.

The answer is 4. Sex.

This has very important ramifications for women. Every male you absorb spermatazoa from becomes a living part of you for life. The women autopsied in this study were elderly. Some had been carrying the living male DNA inside them for well over 50 years.

Sperm is alive. It is living cells. When it is injected into you it swims and swims until it crashes headlong into a wall, and then it attaches and burrows into your flesh. If it’s in your mouth it swims and climbs into your nasal passages, inner ear, and behind your eyes. Then it digs in. It enters your blood stream and collects in your brain and spine.

Like something out of a scifi movie, it becomes a part of you and you can’t get rid of it.

We are only now beginning to understand the full power and ramifications of sexual intercourse.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4025111&forum_id=2#36419987)

Semen Can Literally Control the Female Brain

Lindy West8/21/12 4:10pm

I hate to break this to you, but if you're a woman capable of ovulating who has, let's say, internalized some semen in the recent past, then...there is semen. In your brain. No, higher. To the right. Right there. Little higher. Yep, got it.

Researchers have identified a protein present in all mammalian semen—camels, weasels, bats, bunnies, piglets, horses, blue whales, and humans (that's all the mammals, right?)—that directly affects the female brain and stimulates ovulation. It's called nerve growth factor (NGF if you're nasty) and it's typically found in nerve cells, where it regulates nerve maintenance. By day. By night NGF loses the glasses and takes its ponytail down and it's a whole other story:

NGF in the semen acts as a hormonal signal, working through the hypothalamus of the female brain and the pituitary gland. This triggers the release of other hormones that signal the ovaries to release an egg or eggs.

While the protein may function differently from animal to animal, the team found it in every species they checked, from llamas, cattle and koalas to pigs, rabbits, mice, and humans - implying it's pretty important.

Just how it works, though, its role in various species, and its clinical relevance to human infertility are still unclear.

..."The idea that a substance in mammalian semen has a direct effect on the female brain is a new one," says Adams. "This latest finding broadens our understanding of the mechanisms that regulate ovulation and raises some intriguing questions about fertility."

Obviously it'll be super excellent if NGF can someday help couples or single women struggling with fertility problems. And despite the grossness of putting "semen" and "brain" right next to each other in a sentence (and yes, I understand that the sperms do not literally swim up and touch the brain!), this discovery is fascinating. But I have to say, the idea that semen exerts a tangible, physiological effect on the female body makes me deeply uncomfortable—it seems like such an easy talking point for anti-gay maniacs, or that subset of human garbage that thinks lesbians just need a good dicking. You know? Ugh. But, facts are facts and science is science—I'm also uncomfortable with the existence of everything in the ocean (have you SEEN THE OCEAN?), but I'm not, like, writing letters and shit.

And it does punch quite a big hole in the Todd Akin "what I've heard from doctors" school of uterine science sorcery—the female body, it seems, is way more interested in revving things up than shutting things down. I mean if it's legitimate semen.

Photo credit: nicemonkey

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4025111&forum_id=2#36420854)

The study, which discovered the startling information by accident The study, which discovered the startling information by accident The study, which discovered the startling information by accident The study, which discovered the startling information by accident The study, which discovered the startling information by accident The study, which discovered the startling information by accident The study, which discovered the startling information by accident The study, which discovered the startling information by accident The study, which discovered the startling information by accident The study, which discovered the startling information by accident The study, which discovered the startling information by accident The study, which discovered the startling information by accident The study, which discovered the startling information by accident The study, which discovered the startling information by accident The study, which discovered the startling information by accident The study, which discovered the startling information by accident The study, which discovered the startling information by accident The study, which discovered the startling information by accident The study, which discovered the startling information by accident The study, which discovered the startling information by accident The study, which discovered the startling information by accident The study, which discovered the startling information by accident The study, which discovered the startling information by accident The study, which discovered the startling information by accident The study, which discovered the startling information by accident The study, which discovered the startling information by accident The study, which discovered the startling information by accident The study, which discovered the startling information by accident The study, which discovered the startling information by accident The study, which discovered the startling information by accident

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4025111&forum_id=2#36420917)

heh.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4025111&forum_id=2#36421411)

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/women-retain-dna/

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4025111&forum_id=2#36458101)