\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Trump speechwriter defends appearance @ white nationalist conference, won't quit

Trump fires him. Why? https://www.washingtonpost.com/amph...
"'''"""
  08/19/18
...
.;.;...;.;...;.;.;;;.;.;..;..;.
  08/19/18
JFC at this line: “Beattie wrote his doctoral thesis on M...
CharlesXII
  08/19/18
...
crazy pills
  08/19/18
...
gravelgang
  08/20/18
...
''''''''"''''
  08/20/18
Cartoon world.
Boichester United
  08/20/18
"I'm just asking questions" says the Nazi
ma anand sheela
  08/22/18
fuck Trump. guy should have attended the Jewish/Israeli Nat...
Drinkwater
  08/19/18
Trump speechwriter fired amid scrutiny of appearance with wh...
Two 115-IQ Redditors stealing in Golden Balls
  08/19/18
...
"'''"""
  08/19/18
Trump should hire the guy who writes for Tucker
CRUNK!!!usnacht
  08/19/18
*Cucker
Dr. Ford
  08/19/18
...
Such anathema to us!
  08/22/18
Trump is a complete cuck and will never build the wall
Wilbur Mercer, the supreme gentleman
  08/19/18
...
Dr. Ford
  08/19/18
He was in the same room as a Nationalist
Dr. Ford
  08/19/18
Stupid. Libs wont care either way and Trump needs an ideolog...
Maori woman performing defiant haka
  08/20/18
by "white nationalist conference" i assumed you me...
,.,..,.,..,.,.,.,..,.,..,..,..,.,,..,.,,.
  08/20/18
He was there with the vdare guy!!!
'''''''
  08/20/18
He attended an event once attended by Richard Spencer Hen...
'''''''
  08/20/18
Cr its a joke
Dr. Ford
  08/20/18
"We don't comment on personnel matters." "Ok...
Deranged Penguin
  08/20/18
...
"'''"""
  08/20/18
"CNN's KFile" I lolled
Buck "The Club" Paulette
  08/20/18
fancy way of saying "guy who blackmailed some redditor ...
don't run xo po process servers see ur moniker
  08/20/18
Say what you will about Dems but they dont have these types ...
....,..,..,,,....,,....,...
  08/20/18
They protect their own, don’t mind being called crazy or hat...
Dr. Ford
  08/20/18
way back in 1995, republicans tried to nail bill clinton by ...
,.,..,.,..,.,.,.,..,.,..,..,..,.,,..,.,,.
  08/20/18
This is the talk Beattie gave at the conference. There’s zer...
Such anathema to us!
  08/21/18


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: August 19th, 2018 9:16 PM
Author: "'''""" ( )


Trump fires him. Why?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/politics/trump-speechwriter-fired-amid-scrutiny-of-appearance-with-white-nationalists/2018/08/19/f5051b52-a3eb-11e8-a656-943eefab5daf_story.html

CNN’s KFile, an investigative unit, published a report Sunday on Beattie and his appearance at the Mencken event, which has been attended in the past by white nationalist Richard Spencer. Spencer is a prominent figure in the “alt-right,” a movement whose adherents are known for espousing racist, sexist and anti-Semitic points of view.

Once White House officials were informed about CNN’s pending report, Beattie reportedly was confronted and urged to step down immediately. But he apparently refused to resign, arguing that he was not racist and that he had made uncontroversial academic points at the Mencken gathering. When it became clear that Beattie would not resign, the people familiar with the matter said, the White House terminated him.

Beattie worked for Vince Haley, the head of speechwriting at the White House and at times worked on speech projects for Stephen Miller, Trump’s top policy adviser and speechwriter, the people added.

It was not clear Sunday whether President Trump or Chief of Staff John F. Kelly were personally involved in Beattie’s departure.

“Mr. Beattie no longer works at the White House,” White House spokesman Hogan Gidley said in a statement to The Washington Post. “We don’t comment on personnel matters.”

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4055803&forum_id=2#36645796)



Reply Favorite

Date: August 19th, 2018 9:17 PM
Author: .;.;...;.;...;.;.;;;.;.;..;..;.




(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4055803&forum_id=2#36645802)



Reply Favorite

Date: August 19th, 2018 9:22 PM
Author: CharlesXII (CharlesXII)

JFC at this line:

“Beattie wrote his doctoral thesis on Martin Heidegger, who was a member of the Nazi Party in Germany. Beattie has called Heidegger’s Nazi affiliation “highly troublesome” but maintained that his work is worthy of scholarly attention, according to a report by Forward magazine.”

Literally implying it’s white nationalism to regard Heidegger’s work as important.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4055803&forum_id=2#36645839)



Reply Favorite

Date: August 19th, 2018 9:25 PM
Author: crazy pills



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4055803&forum_id=2#36645860)



Reply Favorite

Date: August 20th, 2018 2:54 AM
Author: gravelgang (ggtp)



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4055803&forum_id=2#36647094)



Reply Favorite

Date: August 20th, 2018 8:38 AM
Author: ''''''''"''''



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4055803&forum_id=2#36647478)



Reply Favorite

Date: August 20th, 2018 9:06 AM
Author: Boichester United

Cartoon world.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4055803&forum_id=2#36647515)



Reply Favorite

Date: August 22nd, 2018 12:36 AM
Author: ma anand sheela

"I'm just asking questions" says the Nazi

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4055803&forum_id=2#36660598)



Reply Favorite

Date: August 19th, 2018 9:24 PM
Author: Drinkwater

fuck Trump.

guy should have attended the Jewish/Israeli Nationalism conference instead, with Trump's jew daughter and grandchildren. then he'd still have a job.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4055803&forum_id=2#36645848)



Reply Favorite

Date: August 19th, 2018 9:26 PM
Author: Two 115-IQ Redditors stealing in Golden Balls

Trump speechwriter fired amid scrutiny of appearance with white nationalists

By Robert Costa

August 19, 2018 at 4:54 PM

A White House speechwriter for President Trump was terminated last week after revelations that he had spoken at a conference attended by well-known white nationalists, according to three people familiar with the decision who were not authorized to speak publicly.

Darren Beattie, who was a visiting instructor at Duke University before he joined the White House speechwriting team, was fired Friday after a media inquiry about his appearance at the 2016 H.L. Mencken Club conference, where Beattie spoke on a panel alongside Peter Brimelow.

Brimelow, founder of the anti-immigrant website Vdare.com, is a “white nationalist” and “regularly publishes works by white supremacists, anti-Semites, and others on the radical right,” according to the Southern Poverty Law Center, an advocacy group that tracks extremists.

Earlier this year, Brimelow described himself as a believer in “racial nationalism” who sees the future of the United States “precipitating out on racial lines.”

CNN’s KFile, an investigative unit, published a report Sunday on Beattie and his appearance at the Mencken event, which has been attended in the past by white nationalist Richard Spencer. Spencer is a prominent figure in the “alt-right,” a movement whose adherents are known for espousing racist, sexist and anti-Semitic points of view.

Once White House officials were informed about CNN’s pending report, Beattie reportedly was confronted and urged to step down immediately. But he apparently refused to resign, arguing that he was not racist and that he had made uncontroversial academic points at the Mencken gathering. When it became clear that Beattie would not resign, the people familiar with the matter said, the White House terminated him.

Related: [‘I’m not going there’: As Trump hurls racial invective, most Republicans stay silent]

Beattie worked for Vince Haley, the head of speechwriting at the White House and at times worked on speech projects for Stephen Miller, Trump’s top policy adviser and speechwriter, the people added.

It was not clear Sunday whether President Trump or Chief of Staff John F. Kelly were personally involved in Beattie’s departure.

“Mr. Beattie no longer works at the White House,” White House spokesman Hogan Gidley said in a statement to The Washington Post. “We don’t comment on personnel matters.”

Beattie, when reached by phone Sunday, declined to elaborate on his dismissal but provided The Post with a statement.

“In 2016 I attended the Mencken conference in question and delivered a stand-alone, academic talk titled ‘The Intelligentsia and the Right.’ I said nothing objectionable and stand by my remarks completely,” Beattie said in the statement. “It was the honor of my life to serve in the Trump Administration. I love President Trump, who is a fearless American hero, and continue to support him one hundred percent. I have no further comment.”

Related: [How white supremacists split a quiet Rust Belt town]

Beattie, who holds a doctorate from Duke University, was one of the rare academics on the White House staff.

In 2016, he went public with his support for Trump and cited Trump’s hard-line immigration position as one of the key reasons for his victory.

“One of the signals for me is when Trump made his provocative remarks on immigration and then refused to apologize in the wake of overwhelming corporate and media opposition,” Beattie told the Chronicle, a newspaper at Duke.

Beattie wrote his doctoral thesis on Martin Heidegger, who was a member of the Nazi Party in Germany. Beattie has called Heidegger’s Nazi affiliation “highly troublesome” but maintained that his work is worthy of scholarly attention, according to a report by Forward magazine.

763 Comments

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4055803&forum_id=2#36645862)



Reply Favorite

Date: August 19th, 2018 9:52 PM
Author: "'''""" ( )




(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4055803&forum_id=2#36646059)



Reply Favorite

Date: August 19th, 2018 9:54 PM
Author: CRUNK!!!usnacht

Trump should hire the guy who writes for Tucker

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4055803&forum_id=2#36646066)



Reply Favorite

Date: August 19th, 2018 9:56 PM
Author: Dr. Ford

*Cucker

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4055803&forum_id=2#36646079)



Reply Favorite

Date: August 22nd, 2018 12:34 AM
Author: Such anathema to us! (as The Americans)



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4055803&forum_id=2#36660588)



Reply Favorite

Date: August 19th, 2018 9:55 PM
Author: Wilbur Mercer, the supreme gentleman (Short Pride World Wide)

Trump is a complete cuck and will never build the wall

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4055803&forum_id=2#36646068)



Reply Favorite

Date: August 19th, 2018 9:56 PM
Author: Dr. Ford



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4055803&forum_id=2#36646075)



Reply Favorite

Date: August 19th, 2018 9:56 PM
Author: Dr. Ford

He was in the same room as a Nationalist

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4055803&forum_id=2#36646074)



Reply Favorite

Date: August 20th, 2018 2:58 AM
Author: Maori woman performing defiant haka

Stupid. Libs wont care either way and Trump needs an ideological compass

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4055803&forum_id=2#36647100)



Reply Favorite

Date: August 20th, 2018 3:05 AM
Author: ,.,..,.,..,.,.,.,..,.,..,..,..,.,,..,.,,.


by "white nationalist conference" i assumed you meant amren or one of the richard spencer/NPI events. the fucking mencken conference? that's not even white nationalist at all. that's like the john randolph club or one of the other fairly obscure paleocon groups.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4055803&forum_id=2#36647111)



Reply Favorite

Date: August 20th, 2018 7:17 AM
Author: '''''''

He was there with the vdare guy!!!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4055803&forum_id=2#36647337)



Reply Favorite

Date: August 20th, 2018 7:14 AM
Author: '''''''

He attended an event once attended by Richard Spencer

Hence he had to go. So good we have so many fearful cucks in the WH ready to do cnns bidding

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4055803&forum_id=2#36647334)



Reply Favorite

Date: August 20th, 2018 9:25 AM
Author: Dr. Ford

Cr its a joke

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4055803&forum_id=2#36647563)



Reply Favorite

Date: August 20th, 2018 7:18 AM
Author: Deranged Penguin

"We don't comment on personnel matters."

"Okay, we'll just check twitter then."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4055803&forum_id=2#36647341)



Reply Favorite

Date: August 20th, 2018 7:34 AM
Author: "'''""" ( )




(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4055803&forum_id=2#36647366)



Reply Favorite

Date: August 20th, 2018 7:48 AM
Author: Buck "The Club" Paulette

"CNN's KFile"

I lolled

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4055803&forum_id=2#36647381)



Reply Favorite

Date: August 20th, 2018 9:17 AM
Author: don't run xo po process servers see ur moniker

fancy way of saying "guy who blackmailed some redditor who made a mean gif about CNN"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4055803&forum_id=2#36647546)



Reply Favorite

Date: August 20th, 2018 9:28 AM
Author: ....,..,..,,,....,,....,...


Say what you will about Dems but they dont have these types of problems

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4055803&forum_id=2#36647570)



Reply Favorite

Date: August 20th, 2018 9:33 AM
Author: Dr. Ford

They protect their own, don’t mind being called crazy or hateful and understand what is at sake

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4055803&forum_id=2#36647600)



Reply Favorite

Date: August 20th, 2018 4:44 PM
Author: ,.,..,.,..,.,.,.,..,.,..,..,..,.,,..,.,,.


way back in 1995, republicans tried to nail bill clinton by associating him with louis farrakhan and the million man march. clinton never actually condemned farrakhan. he just made comments about "disagreeing" with him and finding some of his remarks offensive. clinton never called for farrakhan to be "de-platformed" or cut off by his organization's payment processors, etc. the GOP screamed at him for this, but... clinton won.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4055803&forum_id=2#36650214)



Reply Favorite

Date: August 21st, 2018 11:15 PM
Author: Such anathema to us! (as The Americans)

This is the talk Beattie gave at the conference. There’s zero racial content at all. Not even anything about immigration or anything that could be construed as a “dog whistle” even at a stretch. It’s all economics and philosophy, if anything, a bit dry. (He does have a good line slamming Boomers in there at least.) It’s worth clicking through; John Derbyshire shows up to pwn a shitlib in the comments,

https://amgreatness.com/2018/08/21/read-the-paper-cnn-says-is-white-supremacist/

Read the Paper CNN Says Is ‘White Supremacist’

By Darren J. Beattie| August 21st, 2018

Editor’s note: The White House last week fired speechwriter Darren Beattie after CNN reported he had “white supremacist ties.” Beattie, who contributed to American Greatness early in our publication history, spoke at conference the discredited Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) deemed a “band of white nationalists, pseudoacademic and academic racists.”

Beattie, who was a Duke University political science professor at the time, delivered the paper—titled “Intelligentsia and The Right”—as part of a panel at the annual conference of the H.L. Mencken Club in 2016.

Beattie issued a statement over the weekend in response to CNN’s story: “In 2016 I attended the Mencken conference in question and delivered a stand-alone, academic talk titled ‘The Intelligentsia and the Right.’ I said nothing objectionable and stand by my remarks completely. It was the honor of my life to serve in the Trump Administration. I love President Trump, who is a fearless American hero, and continue to support him one hundred percent. I have no further comment.”

American Greatness obtained the draft of Beattie’s paper. It has been edited only slightly to correct a few typographical errors. We’ve also provided English translations for a few German phrases at the end. Otherwise, the paper is as Beattie presented it in 2016. We invite readers to judge for themselves whether his work is “pseudoacademic,” “racist,” or “white supremacist.”

Intelligentsia and The Right

I’d like to begin by thanking the H.L Mencken Club and particularly Professor Paul Gottfried for being generous enough to invite me to speak here. I consider it a great honor.

I’ve been asked to address the question of “The Intelligentsia and the Right.” For those of us unfortunate enough to have inhabited what passes as the conservative world of “ideas” this topic would seem to invoke a well-worn genre of defeatism and lamentation associated with the frustrating but otherwise indisputable fact that, since World War II at least—and in some ways going back much farther than that—the intellectual class and creative class more generally have been associated with the left and the advancement of a so-called left-wing agenda. That many of you likely heard the phrase “Intelligentsia and the Right” and had the immediate thought of a separate and oppositional relationship between the two words—that is, the intelligentsia as considered apart from and antagonistic to the right—testifies to the status of this old genre and the reality it reflects.

But I don’t need to tell you—though it always bears repetition—that these are no ordinary times. Changes are afoot. Accordingly, I’d like to address what I think are some underlying developments giving rise to the emergence of, if not an intelligentsia of the “right” then certainly one that stands in stark and robust opposition to what we’ve come to describe as the “left.” Please note that I use these terms “right” and “left” tentatively and with qualification because the developments to which I attribute the optimistic possibility of a new kind of intelligentsia are at the same time developments that call into question the usefulness of the “left” “right” paradigm itself.

Furthermore, note that in discussing the possibility of a new type of intelligentsia emerging from recent historical developments pertaining to the changing circumstances and structure of ideology, society, and the economy, I thereby give a nod to the broadly Hegelian and Marxist connotations of the term without being able to address at adequate length the its complicated and rich intellectual history, not to mention the vexed philosophical questions lingering within that history. I’ll come back to this point briefly at the end of my talk.

Now, what are the circumstances and developments that have given rise to the possibility, speaking very broadly, of an intelligentsia of the right? There’s much to say about this, but I will confine my remarks to three major developments, the first of which is the death of American conservatism, and particularly the movement conservative ideology that emerged during the Cold War and culminated in Reagan’s presidency.

When I speak of the “death of movement conservatism” I do not mean to suggest that there are no people who would claim to remain in its tradition, or that such claims would be entirely false from the perspective of any particular professed Reaganite movement holdout. Indeed, at this point I know better than to underestimate the cluelessness of aspirational suburbia, especially in its Baby Boomer instantiations, whose status angst continues to generate a modicum of genuine demand for the kinds of Paul Singer subsidized, upper middle brow think pieces that appear in glossy legacy rags like National Review. But I digress.

When I say that movement conservatism is dead I mean that the circumstances that once provided a certain coherence and viability to the three chief components of the movement conservative coalition no longer exist. More specifically, the so-called fusionism that attempted to reconcile socially conservative religious traditionalism of the Kirkean variety with a generally libertarian free market capitalism only made sense within a now defunct or non-existent Cold War context. It is no accident then that this coalition proved most successful during Reagan’s presidency, which oversaw the fall of the Soviet Union and the end of the Cold War.

Fusionism was so called because it was able to construct a narrative that fused together traditionalist Burkean social conservatives and religious Christians, firstly, Cold-War hawks (Cold Warriors), secondly, and free market economic types (including libertarians like Friedman), finally, together. My central claim with respect to fusionism is that the tripartite coalition to which it refers makes no internal sense by itself, but rather it borrows its coherence artificially not only from the geopolitical threat posed by the USSR, but also from its reactive opposition to communist ideology as such.

Whereas fusionism is contingent and artificial in its American conservative expression, something similar to fusionism is imbedded much more essentially into communist doctrine at least in its classical Marxist forms. Karl Marx’s theory integrated its atheism with a dialectical materialism, which was at the same time an economic doctrine. The very real fusionism that belonged to classical Marxist theory made the reactive and contingent fusionism in America between free-market libertarians and religious Christian social conservatives possible; furthermore, the fact that this enemy atheistic-economic ideology received its expression in a major competing World Power made the hawkish foreign policy element a natural part of this coalition.

With the end of the Cold War and the fall of the Berlin Wall, the artificial supports providing temporary coherence to movement conservatism began to disintegrate. The full impact of this disintegration, however, enjoyed a certain postponement; partially this was due to the “holiday from history” that characterized the period of peace and economic prosperity between the fall of the Berlin Wall and 9/11; and partially because the self-identified conservatives’ response to 9/11 was a desperate and implausible attempt to portray Islamic Terror as the new Soviet-type threat in a way that would preserve the basic logic of the Reagan coalition. This band-aid job worked for a bit, but ultimately proved incoherent. Now with the failures of the Bush foreign policy plain to see, and with the middle class evaporating due, among other things, to the intensification of certain structural features of the economy, the irrelevance and inadequacy of movement conservatism can be felt rather than merely thought.

I ought to note that my analysis of the ahistorical and irrelevant character of fusionist movement conservatism is not strictly speaking a philosophical critique of, say, Meyer’s project. Meyer’s lack of philosophical depth probably was indispensable to the creation of a viable narrative on which to build a political coalition. My point is that that viability itself depended on a certain ideological and historical context that no longer exists.

The virtue of the increasingly indisputable collapse of movement conservatism is that the actual political configuration post-Cold War can be understood with greater clarity. Of course, there were further obfuscations pertaining to the role of an intellectual.

If somebody like Kojeve could have envisaged the role of an intellectual during the Cold War as working to reify a Stalinist universal and homogeneous state, Fukuyama’s modification of Kojeve upon the fall of the Berlin wall would simply suggest that the intellectual’s role would be to help reify the universal homogeneous state in its newly discovered historically appropriate instantiation via global democratic capitalism, human rights, and so forth.

There are many problems with Fukuyama’s thesis, but the one immediately relevant here is that so much of the debate surrounding his particular end of history thesis is that, whether one agreed with it or not, the debate was framed in such a way that obscured the true political configuration that emerged. That is, the discussion surrounding Fukuyama’s end of history thesis largely took for granted that the opposing forces in question were, on the one hand, capitalist globalization bolstered by democratic universalist philosophy, and, on the other, recidivist and reactionary tribalism. This characterization obscures the actual situation of the post-Cold War West in which the dominant “global” paradigm seems to be characterized by an unexpected and still not adequately explored connection between a certain masochistic religion of identity politics, global multinational capitalism, and the military industrial complex.

The connection has been explored a bit by Gottfried and Greenwald. My insight into this horrifying development is that it makes sense structurally in terms of a certain confluence of Nietzschean and Marxist factors. The Marxist side of what’s going on—that is, the side that accounts for certain social and class developments on account of underlying economic or material developments, has to do with the increasingly questionable role of the middle and working class under contemporary conditions governed by the underlying radical logic of economies of scale that characterizes the development of our integrated techno-corporate-global system. For example, with technological automation, integration, and economies of scale, the threshold for becoming a truly productive and valuable contributor to the economy is increasing dramatically—a process by which we little people become mere trivial zeros in the grand scheme of a rotten globo-corporate elite’s proprietary zeta function. What results is an ever increasing number of middle class Westerners who are shut out of the elite and economic relevance of the productive economy generally, and an increasing jealousy on the part of those in the elite to guard and protect their status.

But the increasing number of working-class, middle-class, upper-middle class, and even wealthy but not ultra-wealthy and connected pose a distinct problem, because unlike the imported masses from the developing world, they have a proven capacity to organize politically, and certain historical expectations regarding liberty and self-government. Whereas the Cultural Marxists may have resented the bourgeois on account of the bourgeois hindering the progression to a Marxist utopia, and resented the working class for not previously universally mobilizing against the bourgeois as was expected and predicted by Classical Marxists, the Corporate Marxists resent the bourgeois for preventing the natural progression toward a system like Brazil, in which a vanishingly small wealthy, gated, insulated elite lords it over hordes of easily controlled helots. Brazil is the new Marxist utopia for the Corporate Marxists, if you’ll forgive the term, though utopia might be an inapt term given the distinct plausibility of this eventuality.

I mentioned that there was a Nietzschean component to this dynamic in addition to a Marxist one. Indeed, though Nietzschean explanations are often contrasted with Marxist ones as the psychological to the material, yet in this case the Nietzschean psychological diagnosis of slave morality, masochism, whatever you want to call it actually operates in conjunction with the emerging class dynamic insofar as it serves to pacify or neutralize what would otherwise be an increasingly problematic class for the elite.

So this little sketch of the post-Cold War situation in the West is quite a bit different from the idealized model of a universalist classical liberalism of human rights bolstering a global capitalism as envisaged by Fukuyama. And this alternative account might therefore leave room for an appropriately historical alternative to the dominant paradigm, which is not possible in Fukuyama’s account in which the only alternative to democratic capitalist globalization are reactionary and therefore ultimately ahistorical.

I want to conclude this talk by giving a brief characterization of some structural dynamics that I think are conducive to the growth of a formidable intelligentsia that would function as an alternative to the dominant paradigm of the post-Cold War West.

This dominant paradigm, sometimes called globalization, ought to be understood according to its institutional reality. That is, just as the dominant system is not really characterized by universal human rights and capitalism as understood in reading packets, but rather according to the Marxist-Nietzschean dynamic described above, so must the associated term globalization undergo a similar reality check. Whatever fancy and idealized theories used to describe it, globalization in the real sense refers to a particular set of interests and a common investment in a particular assortment of untruths. Global democracy in reality refers to a specific geopolitical alliance with little to do with democracy; the same countries have a common stake in a certain reckless and unsustainable monetary policy through the coordination of various central banks taking on enormous debt; global free trade is in fact the trade deals written by lobbyists in dark rooms. The errors associated with globalization, and particularly those associated with immigration and monetary policy, are so large that a bubble has been created out of desperate attempts to avoid the reckoning with reality.

What does this have to do with the emergence of an oppositional intelligentsia? Well, much is said about the importance of the working class in the politics of anti-globalization, precisely because the economic model of globalization has the effect of casting more and more people out of the middle class. This is true, though I would also argue that very similar forces are leading to an increasing group of extremely intelligent young people who will be either unemployed or underemployed. The easy middle class existence that helped keep the Boomers so pleasantly docile in the face of the nation’s transformation doesn’t exist as a possibility for many my age and younger. So the opportunity cost of defection is diminishing. As defection accelerates, parallel institutions are formed that in turn diminish the marginal cost of future defections. There is a logic of a cascade effect at work.

Problems exist on the side of the elite as well. One of the paradoxes of our time is Mittleschicht verschwindet mittelmaessigkeit herrscht. That is, middle class disappears and mediocrity reigns. Competition is so intense in the academic world and the winners are less impressive than ever. My explanation for this is precisely that the reigning paradigm is a bubble, and this means that just as available jobs diminish so do the desired qualifications for the jobs change. More important is that the job be used to sustain the lie behind the bubble, which requires intellectual mediocrity or timidity, usually both. So in conjunction with the increasing incentives for defection is the possibility that young, ambitious smart people have less and less of an obvious place in the ever shrinking number of jobs sanctioned by the dominant system.

I’m over my time. Suffice it to say I see certain structure features of our situation that bode very well for the emergence of an intellectual class that is opposed to globalization in its present form. As I mentioned in the beginning, I’m not sure whether what will emerge could be classified in left-right terminology.

Because my feeling is optimistic for politics and culture in the medium term, I want to close with a note of not pessimism but caution. The optimistic structural dynamics I allude to say nothing about the underlying philosophical problems contributing to the spiritual deficiencies of the West. I cannot assume that political victories against our corrupt system will necessarily translate into or emerge from something of real philosophical significance, and might actually impede it. This philosophical problem is one I originally wanted to address, but felt that it was beyond the scope of what I could do here.

Heidegger closed one of his famously provocative analyses of Technology with a quote from the German poet Hoelderlin: “Wo aber Gefahr ist, waescht das Rettende auch.” (“Where the danger is, so grows the saving element.”)

In light of the possibility of political and cultural success, but continued philosophical and spiritual darkness, I close with the following modification: “Hinter das Rettende liegt auch das Gefahr.” (“Behind salvation danger also lies.”)

Thank you.



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4055803&forum_id=2#36660168)