\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Richard Rorty and the End of Metaphysics

im done here
Learning disabled azure main people
  09/20/18
absolutely devastating
stirring onyx address volcanic crater
  09/20/18
Richard Rorty
Learning disabled azure main people
  09/20/18
Rorty, Richard
Indigo Aggressive Indian Lodge
  09/20/18
he is dead.
Learning disabled azure main people
  09/20/18
i stopped reading philosophy after i got to James and Rorty
Indigo Aggressive Indian Lodge
  09/20/18
sounds like they did their job
Learning disabled azure main people
  09/20/18
i think i was already thinking what the pragmatists were thi...
Indigo Aggressive Indian Lodge
  09/20/18
exactly my experience. ive been reading royce lately though ...
Learning disabled azure main people
  09/20/18
never read him
Indigo Aggressive Indian Lodge
  09/20/18
very cr if you're a philocuck
Learning disabled azure main people
  09/20/18
resolved: pragmatism is the only pragmatic way to approach l...
talented useless police squad
  09/20/18
are you a non-correspondencemo?
Learning disabled azure main people
  09/20/18
yeah i think all pragmatic people are, right?
talented useless police squad
  09/20/18
i dunno about putnam. he thinks that usefulness is a mark of...
Learning disabled azure main people
  09/20/18
i agree with that (your 2nd sentence), i'm just not sure if ...
talented useless police squad
  09/20/18
I think what you're saying is that the purpose of any concep...
Learning disabled azure main people
  09/20/18


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: September 20th, 2018 12:32 PM
Author: Learning disabled azure main people

im done here

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4082252&forum_id=2#36848704)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 20th, 2018 12:33 PM
Author: stirring onyx address volcanic crater

absolutely devastating

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4082252&forum_id=2#36848716)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 20th, 2018 12:33 PM
Author: Learning disabled azure main people

Richard Rorty

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4082252&forum_id=2#36848719)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 20th, 2018 12:41 PM
Author: Indigo Aggressive Indian Lodge

Rorty, Richard

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4082252&forum_id=2#36848773)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 20th, 2018 12:45 PM
Author: Learning disabled azure main people

he is dead.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4082252&forum_id=2#36848812)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 20th, 2018 12:46 PM
Author: Indigo Aggressive Indian Lodge

i stopped reading philosophy after i got to James and Rorty

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4082252&forum_id=2#36848823)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 20th, 2018 12:47 PM
Author: Learning disabled azure main people

sounds like they did their job

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4082252&forum_id=2#36848828)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 20th, 2018 12:48 PM
Author: Indigo Aggressive Indian Lodge

i think i was already thinking what the pragmatists were thinking and was just waiting for someone with more intellectual horsepower to write it down. life is flame, do what works, pretend that x is important and it will be, pretend to be y and you will be

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4082252&forum_id=2#36848840)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 20th, 2018 12:52 PM
Author: Learning disabled azure main people

exactly my experience. ive been reading royce lately though so im not totally off it but its not the same

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4082252&forum_id=2#36848873)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 20th, 2018 1:55 PM
Author: Indigo Aggressive Indian Lodge

never read him

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4082252&forum_id=2#36849236)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 20th, 2018 1:57 PM
Author: Learning disabled azure main people

very cr if you're a philocuck

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4082252&forum_id=2#36849254)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 20th, 2018 12:50 PM
Author: talented useless police squad

resolved: pragmatism is the only pragmatic way to approach life and the human condition

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4082252&forum_id=2#36848854)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 20th, 2018 12:53 PM
Author: Learning disabled azure main people

are you a non-correspondencemo?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4082252&forum_id=2#36848882)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 20th, 2018 1:59 PM
Author: talented useless police squad

yeah i think all pragmatic people are, right?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4082252&forum_id=2#36849266)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 20th, 2018 2:02 PM
Author: Learning disabled azure main people

i dunno about putnam. he thinks that usefulness is a mark of correspondence ("no miracles" in the phil of science). my impression is that even if you want to hold some kind of internal realism you still have a correspondence feature, even if its conceptually relative/non-universal.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4082252&forum_id=2#36849285)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 20th, 2018 2:21 PM
Author: talented useless police squad

i agree with that (your 2nd sentence), i'm just not sure if that qualifies as a coherent correspondence since it's relative. i mean to think about anything you need some kind of correspondence framework. of course as a pragmatist i don't think this universal coherence really matters anyway

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4082252&forum_id=2#36849389)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 20th, 2018 2:40 PM
Author: Learning disabled azure main people

I think what you're saying is that the purpose of any conceptual scheme or formalism is utility, not correspondence.

I think that commits you to the position that the same expression in two dissimilar conceptual formalisms can be equivalent as long as their functional properties are equivalent.

My response is that the ability and extent to which a given formalism creates utility is actually dependent on the structure of the expression itself, specifically, the extent to which the structure of the formalism corresponds to the structure of its referent.

Although that's basically all to restate putnam; the formalisms that work the best are the ones the correspond the best.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4082252&forum_id=2#36849496)