Can someone expain what McConnell actually did re Garland?
| copper cuck ratface | 09/20/18 | | pearly orchestra pit jap | 09/20/18 | | Stimulating hateful circlehead trust fund | 09/20/18 | | copper cuck ratface | 09/20/18 | | flickering office | 09/20/18 | | Electric senate gaping | 09/20/18 | | Stimulating hateful circlehead trust fund | 09/20/18 | | house-broken dysfunction | 09/20/18 | | copper cuck ratface | 09/20/18 | | high-end center | 09/20/18 | | copper cuck ratface | 09/20/18 | | Electric senate gaping | 09/20/18 | | high-end center | 09/20/18 | | copper cuck ratface | 09/20/18 | | flickering office | 09/20/18 | | Stimulating hateful circlehead trust fund | 09/20/18 | | high-end center | 09/20/18 | | copper cuck ratface | 09/20/18 | | thriller lavender university filthpig | 09/20/18 | | ruddy sound barrier quadroon | 09/20/18 | | laughsome lilac wrinkle | 09/20/18 | | Stimulating hateful circlehead trust fund | 09/20/18 | | laughsome lilac wrinkle | 09/20/18 | | Stimulating hateful circlehead trust fund | 09/20/18 | | laughsome lilac wrinkle | 09/20/18 | | medicated mischievous shrine clown | 09/20/18 | | laughsome lilac wrinkle | 09/20/18 | | high-end center | 09/20/18 | | laughsome lilac wrinkle | 09/20/18 | | medicated mischievous shrine clown | 09/20/18 | | high-end center | 09/20/18 | | laughsome lilac wrinkle | 09/20/18 | | Comical infuriating home personal credit line | 09/20/18 | | laughsome lilac wrinkle | 09/20/18 | | Comical infuriating home personal credit line | 09/20/18 | | laughsome lilac wrinkle | 09/20/18 | | Comical infuriating home personal credit line | 09/20/18 | | ruddy sound barrier quadroon | 09/20/18 | | high-end center | 09/20/18 | | flickering office | 09/20/18 | | house-broken dysfunction | 09/20/18 | | Stimulating hateful circlehead trust fund | 09/20/18 | | judgmental meetinghouse | 09/20/18 | | Comical infuriating home personal credit line | 09/20/18 | | thriller lavender university filthpig | 09/20/18 | | ruddy sound barrier quadroon | 09/20/18 | | disgusting newt | 09/20/18 | | medicated mischievous shrine clown | 09/20/18 | | Fiercely-loyal Blood Rage | 09/20/18 | | Comical infuriating home personal credit line | 09/20/18 | | Fiercely-loyal Blood Rage | 09/20/18 | | Comical infuriating home personal credit line | 09/20/18 | | Fiercely-loyal Blood Rage | 09/20/18 | | Comical infuriating home personal credit line | 09/20/18 | | beady-eyed abnormal pit messiness | 09/20/18 | | Fiercely-loyal Blood Rage | 09/20/18 | | beady-eyed abnormal pit messiness | 09/20/18 | | insane hairraiser heaven volcanic crater | 09/20/18 | | nofapping snowy haunted graveyard halford | 09/20/18 | | Big space | 09/20/18 |
Poast new message in this thread
|
Date: September 20th, 2018 1:12 PM Author: laughsome lilac wrinkle
Yeah. Their position was basically that Obama was on his way out and we are knee deep in a Presidential election. Let the new President have the nomination.
They would have confirmed Hillary's appointment.
Let's all be honest and say that, supposing RBG died in 2016 with a Republican President but a Dem Senate, the Dem Senate would have done the exact same thing, and the Dem electorate would have clamored for them to do the very same thing.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4082255&forum_id=2#36849022) |
|
Date: September 20th, 2018 1:15 PM Author: judgmental meetinghouse
"It's going to be a clusterfuck next time Dems get senate. Basically no one is ever going to be able to get a candidate through for the foreseeable future unless the have both POTUS and senate"
Is there any indication whatsoever that the Obama administration reached out to the GOP senate leadership to try and work out a compromise candidate? I have never been able to locate a definitive answer to this question. It is my humble opinion that the answer to this question largely determines whether the GOP acted in "bad faith."
If the Obama administration never reached out to the GOP senate leadership, fuck the dems. They have no basis for complaining. If the Obama administration did reach out to the GOP senate leadership in a genuine effort to select a true compromise candidate, and the GOP did not respond in kind, that reflects poorly on the GOP.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4082255&forum_id=2#36849030) |
|
Date: September 20th, 2018 2:57 PM Author: Comical infuriating home personal credit line
Garland would have been confirmed. Mcconnel didnt want dems to get another appointment.
Republicans openly said they would block all of Clinton's appointments if she were elected.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4082255&forum_id=2#36849611)
|
|
Date: September 20th, 2018 4:23 PM Author: thriller lavender university filthpig
11 GOP seantors signed a letter saying they would refuse to consider any Obama nominee on February 23. Scalia died on February 13. 10 fucking days and no nominee named.
https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/2719115/Senate-SCOTUS-Letter.pdf
Pure, unfettered bad faith.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4082255&forum_id=2#36850163) |
Date: September 20th, 2018 12:53 PM Author: disgusting newt
It's a giant Lib lie that Republicans "stole" the Garland nomination. GOP controlled the Senate. That means some GOP would have had to vote for Garland to confirm him. If the GOP collectively had no intention of confirming the nomination, then debating Garland at all was a giant waste of time.
Garland didn't get confirmed because libs didn't have the votes. Plain and simple.
What libs are doing to Kavanaugh is entirely different. They are accusing him of a 35+ year old crime, which is laughably vague and unverifiable.
Equating the two situations is dishonest. The only corrolarly between the two is in both cases, libs didn't get their way so they cry like fucking children and make shit up.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4082255&forum_id=2#36848886) |
|
|