you can only go so far in trying to 'criminalize' male sexuality
| Orchid motley sex offender | 09/20/18 | | 180 brilliant home | 09/20/18 | | Orchid motley sex offender | 09/20/18 | | Vigorous dark nibblets | 09/20/18 | | Disturbing excitant telephone | 09/20/18 | | 180 brilliant home | 09/20/18 | | stirring bawdyhouse | 09/20/18 | | lascivious greedy hairy legs | 09/20/18 | | Shaky Snowy Property Cuck | 09/20/18 | | Shaky Snowy Property Cuck | 01/08/19 | | light infuriating stag film private investor | 09/20/18 | | Orchid motley sex offender | 09/20/18 | | Vengeful burgundy travel guidebook newt | 09/20/18 | | Orchid motley sex offender | 09/20/18 | | Laughsome dilemma | 09/20/18 | | light infuriating stag film private investor | 09/20/18 | | Vengeful burgundy travel guidebook newt | 09/20/18 | | Orchid motley sex offender | 09/20/18 | | Passionate orange meetinghouse | 09/20/18 | | cyan fragrant mother locus | 09/20/18 | | vibrant buck-toothed senate | 09/20/18 | | stirring bawdyhouse | 09/20/18 | | Orchid motley sex offender | 09/20/18 | | cyan fragrant mother locus | 09/20/18 | | cyan fragrant mother locus | 09/20/18 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: September 20th, 2018 6:31 PM Author: 180 brilliant home
That isn’t their object.
They’ve astutely identified that in modern America, women run the show. There are a ton of cucky “men” who just go along with what their wife/gf wants.
What they are trying to do is to radicalize women, calculating that if they get enough of the female vote, and the females feel strongly enough, a sufficient quantity of “‘men” will go along too and vote Dem.
Why do you think they hate incels so much?
Another deeply troubling statistic to (((them))) is that a majority of white women voted for Trump. The current BS is designed to prevent that from ever happening again.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4082487&forum_id=2#36850806) |
|
Date: September 20th, 2018 6:51 PM Author: Orchid motley sex offender
it's just different after a point... you can only go so far, until everyone says 'fuck it'.
postwar feminism was able to be accommodated by Boomer men because it wasn't a full frontal assault on their manhood. it was just women kind of adorably wanting to be *spunky* in ways that had been denied them by traditionalism -- to wear shoulder pads and play 'career woman,' to wear jeans, and blather in falsetto about how STRONG they are, etc. it had a certain charm, because Boomer men largely did not take it seriously, and Boomer women remained largely subservient to Boomer men. the natural order persisted.
now it has reached a phase of militancy that is upsetting the fundamental natural order, and it cannot possibly succeed -- in a war against *masculinity itself*, a war against the very existence of Men. you simply cannot have women running roughshod over men this way, tossing them in jail for 'catcalling' and pool party shenanigans. it is impossible, because the male sexual drive is the most powerful force in the world and will not consent to be policed by women to this degree.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4082487&forum_id=2#36850929) |
|
Date: September 20th, 2018 7:13 PM Author: Orchid motley sex offender
you're putting way too much stock in a series of events that happened within living memory as if they encompass the trajectory of all history.
like i said, the demands of 'feminism' were able to be grudgingly tolerated -- up to a POINT -- because men still retained their manhood on balance (ie, it was a given that the POTUS and the people in power were men, etc). it was still a 'Man's World,' even 25 years ago. now the game has changed. a line has been crossed.
there is a reason 'matriarchy' has never existed. and anyone who thinks it *could* possibly exist is a fool.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4082487&forum_id=2#36851059) |
|
|