There are <100 plausible dem SCOTUS nominees. GOP should plant allegation seeds
| tripping boistinker | 09/24/18 | | well-lubricated laughsome indian lodge hunting ground | 09/24/18 | | tripping boistinker | 09/24/18 | | bistre motley corner | 09/24/18 | | tripping boistinker | 09/24/18 | | bateful ruby clown party of the first part | 09/24/18 | | vermilion stage | 09/24/18 | | electric boltzmann church | 09/24/18 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: September 24th, 2018 9:41 AM Author: tripping boistinker
All it takes is a partisan republican in the nominee's past to allege that something occurred at some point when the two knew each other. Every potential nominee has such people in their past.
If that partisan republican starts telling people about it now, then the story becomes corroborated. If the person tells a therapist and that therapist puts it in some notes, it then becomes a documented, corroborated incident. If more than one partisan does this, then there's a series of documented, corroborated, disqualifying incidents from the nominee's past. It would take fewer than 100 hours of work per potential nominee to plant the seeds now.
Then, sit back and wait. When, inevitably, the dems get a nominee, wait as long as possible and publicize the "incidents." If this is the game we're playing now, play to win.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4085872&forum_id=2#36876310) |
|
|