The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
making 2 or 3 threads abt someone's family member is funny, mega-spamming
Poast new message in this thread
Date: September 25th, 2018 6:25 PM Author: Hairraiser useless box office is too much. it should be the unwritten rule not to do it, because like 'outting', it has a chilling effect, makes everyone uncomfortable, etc. i say this as someone who thinks making fun of the holocaust is funny. |
Date: September 25th, 2018 6:26 PM Author: provocative pervert locus Modding is a slippery slope, having one rule of the land is simple and just. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4087438&forum_id=2#36887750) |
 |
Date: September 25th, 2018 6:28 PM Author: Hairraiser useless box office that's why i say it should be the 'unwritten rule.' this is something we should adhere to because we are noble and rational. |
|
Date: September 25th, 2018 6:29 PM Author: provocative pervert locus Fair on poor reading comp, but disagree. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4087438&forum_id=2#36887761) |
|
Date: September 25th, 2018 6:29 PM Author: Marvelous costumed deer antler No thanks (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4087438&forum_id=2#36887763) |
|
Date: September 25th, 2018 6:27 PM Author: Marvelous costumed deer antler It’s a meme if multiple people are doing it (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4087438&forum_id=2#36887756) |
|
Date: September 25th, 2018 6:31 PM Author: Amethyst internet-worthy stage It is always about the reaction.
When someone flies off the handle, it is natural for this to provoke others to repeat and really dig in. It’s like smelling blood. Peterman is the closest example that comes to mind.
Spaceporn frequently flipped out about this topic, so others (or one guy with a lot of alts, I have no idea) smelled blood and pounced. This is a law of nature and there is nothing we can do about it. |
|
Date: September 25th, 2018 6:32 PM Author: Hairraiser useless box office uh, we could simply agree not do it? what kind of argument is this? |
|
Date: September 25th, 2018 6:34 PM Author: Amethyst internet-worthy stage Agreeing not to do it would be contrary to a law of nature. Pounce on weaknesses.
A largely unmoderated bort = as close to primal nature as we get. |
|
Date: September 25th, 2018 6:39 PM Author: Hairraiser useless box office we are brutes, but we are also scholars here. a Gentleman Scholar would recognize that the occasional 3 or 4 jokes about raping someone's child, raping someone's dead mother's corpse, etc, is sufficient. it adds zest to the board, it's funny. but more than that is in autistic poor taste. |
|
Date: September 25th, 2018 6:42 PM Author: Ruby police squad circlehead 3 or 4 per jokes per moniker? per humanaoid behind the moniker? or in total? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4087438&forum_id=2#36887859) |
|
Date: September 25th, 2018 6:43 PM Author: Amethyst internet-worthy stage I don’t disagree, and didn’t participate in any of these jokes.
However, you haven’t realized that there are some real psychos here? All it takes is 1 or 2. What you are asking for is impossible without imposing a strict new rule, which I would be strongly against. |