also the only currently active poster on xoxo to have posted under one and only one moniker for the duration of my posting career

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4109283&forum_id=2#37046241)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4109283&forum_id=2#37047504)

Lots of biz board fights back then (Courtney and Winner)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4109283&forum_id=2#37046521)

i was there in early 2001 when fixed width bandit broke the board by posting a long text "scream" in hundreds of threads. at the time, the text box didn't automatically break lengthy character strings, and you'd end up with extremely long side-scroll page displays.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4109283&forum_id=2#37046867)

https://cases.justia.com/federal/district-courts/connecticut/ctdce/3:2007cv00909/78132/21/2.pdf?ts=1208808637

prestigiouf?

EDIT: damn, check that list of defendants... Individuals, whose true names are unkown, using the following pseudonyms: pauliewalnuts; neoprag; ST ANFORDtroll; :D; lkjhgf; yalelaw; Spany; ylsdooder; HI; David Car; vincimus; Cheese Eating Surrender Monkey; A horse walks into a bar; The Ayatollah of Rock-n-Rollah; DRACULA; Sleazy Z; Whamo; Ari Gold; U gly Women; playboytroll; Dean_Harold _ Koh; krOnz; reminderdood; r~ygold; who is; Joel Schellhammer; Prof. Brian Leiter; hitlerhitlerhitler; lonelyvirgin; Patrick Zeke -:patrick8765~hotmaii.com?; Patrick Bateman -:batemanhs08~hotmaii.com?; (DOE I) got a 157 LSA T; azn, azn, azn; Dirty Nigger; leaf; 114 guner; kibitzer; yaieîs2009; AK47,

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4109283&forum_id=2#37047434)

dungeonmasTTTer handing out his "playing cards" (probably the greatest thing I've ever seen on this boart)

chancemeeting's radiohead threading

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4109283&forum_id=2#37047789)

Did xo have way more posters back in the day

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4109283&forum_id=2#37047823)

http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=799345&forum_id=2#9632483

I was very into poop scholarship

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4109283&forum_id=2#37047939)

I remember ivy in my vein, bateman, rodger luo, mobiusnu, JBD, Reshada, joe_vaj, RIP all, you were all great

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4109283&forum_id=2#37047950)

I’ve been using this username since summer 2007 though

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4109283&forum_id=2#37047965)

http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1055846&forum_id=2#12418405

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4109283&forum_id=2#37047979)

I remember cavfan, jane hoya, Joe Caltech, 174, and the NYCFan vs. some deranged Princeton alum threads

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4109283&forum_id=2#37048083)

I started in 1999, retired for 4 years, came back in 2003

I think I'm e oldest current poster... The only poster around in 99 was J.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4109283&forum_id=2#37048115)

I meant poster who goes back the farthet

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4109283&forum_id=2#37048134)

I wasn't really w social poster, I only poster about getting into college... Even back then I was obsessed with getting into HYP

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4109283&forum_id=2#37048151)

Law became the focus because GTO is a fucking idiot and decided because he currently was in law school that it was the most important thing on earth. board never recovered from that.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4109283&forum_id=2#37048267)

I remember the first few hours of XO's launch where there was only a college board and all these law faggots showed up and kept typing biglaw in all caps and calling everyone poors. it was like watching a retard parade.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4109283&forum_id=2#37048832)

I took this one as a joke and now am apparently stuck with it :(

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4109283&forum_id=2#37048139)

Is probably 10 years old

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4109283&forum_id=2#37048213)

*hands you psychiatric records*

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4109283&forum_id=2#37048203)

wheely bags

JBD

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4109283&forum_id=2#37048301)

CARNADO FRIENDADO

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4109283&forum_id=2#37048533)

PS: PEnn is SWeet

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4109283&forum_id=2#37048624)

I poasted in this thread as "Ernie Menard": http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=480903&forum_id=2

And pretty sure I made some other threads where I copied and pasted pleadings/briefs from his cases (free Westlaw access in law school).

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4109283&forum_id=2#37048650)

Oct LSAT - LR ? on Job Training

Anyone remember the LR question on job training, think it wa... nyulse 10/07/03

I am pretty sure the answer is something about hiring more p... ronny 10/07/03

Yes, althought the memory is vague, I think that's right.... nycactor 10/07/03

Yeah, that's what I got.... dottie 10/07/03

yup ldoru 10/07/03

does anyone remember what the other answer choices were? no... a.l.b. 10/07/03

I agree with you all about the answer being the one about hi... mary2334 10/07/03

i have no idea how i missed that - thanks v much.... nyulse 10/07/03

i put that it was because they hired new workers and thus th... Maui Jim 10/07/03

i put that they start being serious about safety only after ... rolific* 10/07/03

Post new message in this thread

TopPreviousNextPrintReply

Date: October 07, 2003 02:49 PM

Author: nyulse (smathew00@hotmail.com)

Anyone remember the LR question on job training, think it was number 4 on my first LR, and what the correct answer was? i think it was an explain the paradox question about why there was a spike in training accidents or something immediately after the new job training program had been implemented.

Normally this would be really easy but for some reason I couldnt figure out a reasonable answer. I ended up putting "another study shows different results" which I'm sure cannot be right... anyone remember the right anwer?

TopPreviousNextPrintReply

Date: October 07, 2003 02:55 PM

Author: ronny

I am pretty sure the answer is something about hiring more people at the same time.

In other words, the percentage of people involved in accidents went down (because of the training), but the number of people involved increased because more people were on the job.

TopPreviousNextPrintReply

Date: October 07, 2003 02:58 PM

Author: nycactor

Yes, althought the memory is vague, I think that's right.

TopPreviousNextPrintReply

Date: October 07, 2003 03:01 PM

Author: dottie

Yeah, that's what I got.

TopPreviousNextPrintReply

Date: October 07, 2003 03:00 PM

Author: ldoru

Subject: yup

it had something to do w/ hiring new ppl

TopPreviousNextPrintReply

Date: October 07, 2003 03:05 PM

Author: a.l.b.

does anyone remember what the other answer choices were? now i can't remember what i chose!!! (and am getting paranoid).

TopPreviousNextPrintReply

Date: October 07, 2003 03:50 PM

Author: mary2334

I agree with you all about the answer being the one about hiring more people. As for other choices, I remember one being that the company only does safety training after a high incident of accidents or something to that effect.

TopPreviousNextPrintReply

Date: October 07, 2003 03:04 PM

Author: nyulse (smathew00@hotmail.com)

i have no idea how i missed that - thanks v much.

TopPreviousNextPrintReply

Date: October 07, 2003 03:39 PM

Author: Maui Jim

i put that it was because they hired new workers and thus the paradox was explained! i hope that is correct

TopPreviousNextPrintReply

Date: October 07, 2003 03:52 PM

Author: rolific* (rolific@yahoo.co.uk)

i put that they start being serious about safety only after a spike in accidents ... if there was no spike, this can explain why they weren't serious, even if they were trained. does this ring a bell for anyone?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4109283&forum_id=2#37048651)

Date: October 06, 2003 12:51 PM

Author: Maximum

Subject: Reconstruct the LSAT

See Updated LSAT Below:

(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5771392)

________________________________________

Date: October 06, 2003 12:56 PM

Author: Maximum

Subject: The Wheel Game

See Updated LSAT Below:

(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5771411)

________________________________________

Date: October 06, 2003 12:57 PM

Author: .zarathustra.

M and P are the remaining elements.

(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5771418)

________________________________________

Date: October 06, 2003 01:01 PM

Author: retrospection

hi, remember q22 on final circle game was spaces between I and M i believe. should have been 0 spaces. anyone remember 23 and 24? was 24 two spaces?

(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5771432)

________________________________________

Date: October 06, 2003 01:01 PM

Author: Maximum

See Updated LSAT Below:

(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5771433)

________________________________________

Date: October 06, 2003 01:02 PM

Author: hhhuuuhhh

anyone know if the victorian RC and the one that said something like (written in...) at the top contained a lot of D's?

(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5771440)

________________________________________

Date: October 06, 2003 01:18 PM

Author: Maximum

Subject: LSAT in Progress

Logic Games:

Game 1:

Sequence 4 performances. Each performance will match one Song to one musical instrument. The Instruments were: flute, harmonica, guitar and _______. I don't remember the Songs. 1 of the Rules: The flute cannot be played first.

Game:

There was a Game where 7 people were put into 2 committees, Finance and Incentives.

Q: What is the maximum number of people that could be on the Finance Committee. I believe. A: 4

Game 4:

8 people were seated around a circular table. Fiona, G, H, Ingrid, K, M, Olive, P 3 spaces between F and, I believe, G. I is next to O and clockwise from her. H cannot be next to F or K.

Q22: on final circle game was spaces between I and M i believe. should have been 0 spaces. anyone remember 23 and 24? was 24 two spaces?

Reading Comprehension

Passage 1:

Topic: The Application of Copywright Law in a court case involving Copy Shots.

Passage:

Topic: Philanthropy in Victorian England.

Q: How did the author feel about the concept of Philanthropy mentioned in lines _ - _.

A: Strongly Disagree.

Q: Both modern criticisms of Philanthropy would agree about which statement?

A: It can be dismissed as an inferior system leading up to Government programs.

Passage: The use of Alternative Energy and How to Implement it. Passage: Countee Cullen and his Influences and the topics of his Poetry.

(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5771558)

________________________________________

Date: October 06, 2003 01:43 PM

Author: .zarathustra.

Are you sure about the answer to the Vic. Phil. question -- i.e., what both sides would believe? I don't know what I put down, but I seem to remember a better answer choice.

(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5771728)

________________________________________

Date: October 06, 2003 01:55 PM

Author: Maximum

I'm about 95% on that one. If it was something different, I would know if I heard it, but I am about 99% sure I got it right.

(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5771832)

________________________________________

Date: October 06, 2003 02:01 PM

Author: dottie

I'm with you on that one. It was A, right? That almost tripped me up because at first I was confusing the "earlier criticism" with one of the main ones he was talking about. But then I straightened myself out and realized that the two were both modern and explained individually in paragraphs two and three.

EDIT: I don't know what I'm thinking. The answer I put down basically said that they both talked bad about it. I don't think that's the same one you're talking about.

(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5771881)

________________________________________

Date: October 06, 2003 01:57 PM

Author: Demerzl

Q: Both modern criticisms of Philanthropy would agree about which statement?

I think the answer is that philanthropy was a means to and end, not an end in itself.

(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5771849)

________________________________________

Date: October 06, 2003 02:32 PM

Author: bluebell

I remember choosing an answer that said something about means to an end! Yes! Is it right?

(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5772090)

________________________________________

Date: October 06, 2003 02:56 PM

Author: jsmoey

right on, thats the right answer

(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5772247)

________________________________________

Date: October 06, 2003 02:38 PM

Author: whogives

what about the publisher passage? and the question about comparing the profs to a choir teacher or something like that.

(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5772128)

________________________________________

Date: October 06, 2003 02:43 PM

Author: bluebell

Subject: Copyright passage

One of the questions was something to the effect of--which example is most closely analagous to the professor's role in the situation? The answer: a choir director making copies for the choir. (may have been choice C?)

(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5772156)

________________________________________

Date: October 06, 2003 02:58 PM

Author: whogives

that's what i chose too. i think it was either B or C.

(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5772258)

________________________________________

Date: October 06, 2003 02:52 PM

Author: porkbun

what was the organization of the victorian philanthropy passage?

(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5772222)

________________________________________

Date: October 06, 2003 02:53 PM

Author: bluebell

Subject: Logical reasoning - Speed Limit

Argument: lower speed limits are better blah blah, but does not give a reason why lower speeed limits are *safest*. "Therefore, we should decrease speed limits"

Question: What would WEAKEN the argument?

Answer: Uniformity in speed is safer than lowering the speed limits.

(badly paraphrased)

(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5772225)

________________________________________

Date: October 06, 2003 02:55 PM

Author: bluebell

Subject: Logical reasoning - Smog question

Some hot days there's smog. Some hot days wind comes from the east. The argument goes on to assume somethign or other (? Don't quite remember the conclusion). The answer has something to do with something of one set not necessarily being a part of the other set.

(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5772237)

Access your

personal

Information

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4109283&forum_id=2#37048676)

Sijan's rankings are a fraud

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4109283&forum_id=2#37050290)