Read all of Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep today (4 total in Nov)
| Swashbuckling irate puppy | 11/21/18 | | Frozen Bearded Kitty Jew | 11/21/18 | | Swashbuckling irate puppy | 11/21/18 | | Charismatic citrine ratface institution | 11/21/18 | | ivory pistol french chef | 11/21/18 | | Swashbuckling irate puppy | 11/21/18 | | spectacular point | 11/21/18 | | Swashbuckling irate puppy | 11/21/18 | | Magenta exciting mad-dog skullcap brethren | 11/21/18 | | Swashbuckling irate puppy | 11/21/18 | | twinkling low-t fanboi | 11/21/18 | | Contagious crawly boistinker | 11/21/18 | | Swashbuckling irate puppy | 11/21/18 | | Contagious crawly boistinker | 11/21/18 | | Swashbuckling irate puppy | 11/21/18 | | french school nibblets | 11/21/18 | | Swashbuckling irate puppy | 11/21/18 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: November 21st, 2018 1:30 AM Author: Swashbuckling irate puppy
Haven't done a book thread in a few months but I just cranked this one out tonight and felt like making one. Sadly I've fallen way off pace for my 100-book goal for the year. This was my 80th, so to maek it I'd have to read a book every 2 days before the year ends. Maybe I'll knuckle down and do it but I'm doubtful.
This was my third Dick novel of the year, and probably my favorite. Ubik was more entertaining to read in the moment, but it was also just so weird that by the end you're just thinking "what the fuck?" and some of the impact is lost.
Some other scattered thoughts:
-The book is well-known to be very different from the movie, but I think what surprised me the most is how different the treatment of the androids/replicants themselves is. The movie clearly wants to cultivate sympathy for replicants as a way to raise questions about what it means to be human. The book at times shows flashes of that, but ultimately the androids are portrayed in a far more sinister way; the final question becomes more about how to fight evil without succumbing to inhumanity.
-The book moves in a very brisk, almost jarring way. I've read that Dick tended to write very quickly in order to pay the bills, and that could be the case here. It's a good book with a lot of interesting ideas, but also feels almost like it was written in a single go without any revisions. The entire sequence involving the fake android-staffed police department is the best example; it works okay while reading the novel itself but if you pause and think about the details afterwards it's completely nonsensical. Similarly, the "love story" between Deckard and Rachel makes pretty much no sense at all even to me.
-Never knew Wilbur Mercer was from this book so that was an amusing discovery.
-Dick is definitely a tits man.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4138834&forum_id=2#37275189) |
Date: November 21st, 2018 8:44 AM Author: Frozen Bearded Kitty Jew
Glad to hear you've been DEVOURING some DICK, brother. I did feel it was rather breakneck, but even so I remember offhand Mercerism, the obsession with the synthetic pets, the pheremone synthesizer... it really was chock full of nutty concepts that never really meshed well enough to make it into the movie.
Have you read Valis or Solar Lottery? They're the only two of his besides Ubik that I fully intend to re-read.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4138834&forum_id=2#37275795) |
|
|