\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Retired Jewish academic reflects on the rise of "diversity" during his career:

libs, any comments? The Diversity Miracle Robert Weissbe...
*rnandy*.
  01/11/19
this is hate speech.
diabolical degenerate shooting his goon
  01/11/19
You’re a pedophile.
wesley willis
  01/11/19
get over it, loser.
diabolical degenerate shooting his goon
  01/11/19
Go to jail.
wesley willis
  01/11/19
get over it, loser.
diabolical degenerate shooting his goon
  01/11/19
Jail. Now.
wesley willis
  01/11/19
get over it loser. spamming faggot spic low iq trash.
diabolical degenerate shooting his goon
  01/11/19
...
google starbucks
  01/12/19
Pretty good rant. One usually writes better than this, thoug...
I}e $H /-\ u N
  01/11/19
he made his point.
diabolical degenerate shooting his goon
  01/11/19
He did well straddling the fence, but to me, when it seemed ...
I}e $H /-\ u N
  01/11/19
alright, if thats how you feel. to me it seemed he spit fire...
diabolical degenerate shooting his goon
  01/11/19
lmao at this part of the rant: "Today’s diversity...
;;;..;..;;;..
  01/11/19
GREAT ARGUMENT, HURRRR DURRRRRRRRR jfc
2 Front Doors
  01/11/19
(poli sci major that still couldn't get into law school, doe...
;;;..;..;;;..
  01/11/19
that's wonderful, buddy. great contribution...
2 Front Doors
  01/11/19
(mental illness)
;;;..;..;;;..
  01/11/19
oh, you cant make something dumb even dumber? great logic!
diabolical degenerate shooting his goon
  01/11/19
...
I}e $H /-\ u N
  01/12/19
are you nuts? of course humanities can (and have been) dumb...
*rnandy*.
  01/11/19
...
><<(^((*>
  01/11/19
I imagine he meant by dumbing down the staff's turning a bli...
I}e $H /-\ u N
  01/11/19
This isn't true of "the humanities" but it is true...
.....;;,,.........;.;.;.;.,;,;,;.;.;,;
  01/11/19
The humanities had a long and prestigious history before the...
Gloostick
  01/11/19
tbf you have a warped perspective bc u went to a shitty coll...
google starbucks
  01/11/19
"Whether regularly admitted students seriously interact...
Taylor Swift was not a hobby she was a lifestyle
  01/11/19
yeah he comes out with this now that he's retired and presum...
Oh, you travel?
  01/11/19
well he retired in 2002; i don't think things were QUITE as ...
*rnandy*.
  01/12/19
this essay is actually fucking hilarious, guy is a great wri...
THOT_RAVAGER
  01/11/19
...
ESL TM..,..;;.
  01/12/19


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: January 11th, 2019 12:27 AM
Author: *rnandy*.

libs, any comments?

The Diversity Miracle

Robert Weissberg • January 10, 2019 • 1,700 Words

Today’s world of higher education is not especially notable for miracles. But I am happy to report of one such miracle—the transformation of diversity from an academic liability to an asset of near incalculable benefit. That this transformation occurred in the space of a few decades and cost only a few million, makes it especially notable and gives hope that other miracles may soon appear.

Life Before the Miracle

When I began my university teaching career at an elite university in the late 1960’s the push for racial diversity was just beginning. This meant recruiting African American youngsters from the inner-city, providing extra tutoring during the summer, paying all their expenses and hiring black bureaucrats to oversee progress.

I cannot say how the experiment worked elsewhere, but for myself and department colleagues, it was an academic disaster. These recruits lagged far behind their classmates on every measure of intellectual proficiency, and those who passed the course usually did thanks to instructor generosity. Their written work was especially abysmal, and many proved troublesome students—skipping class with lame excuses, a penchant for plagiarism, and similar burdensome behaviors.

Matters did not improve over the next few decades where I spent twenty-eight years at a major state university. Despite the administration tinkering with recruitment strategies and investing yet more in remedial tutoring schemes, I saw no academic improvement. Rare exceptions aside, the “diversity students” struggled and, as before, I suspect that most survived thanks to more generous grading curves and dumbed down course requirements.

Particularly exasperating was recruiting and retaining African American graduate students. Courses requiring some mastery of statistics and research methods could be especially tough obstacles and many of these admittees thrashed about when it came time to write Ph.D. dissertations. In more than a few cases I can personally attest that overcoming this dissertation hurdle required an “unusual” level of faculty intervention.

Such under-performance could hardly be hidden from other students. I could sometimes see how their classmates smirked when these diversity admittees asked a particularly dumb question or tried to interject race-related nonsensical points into class discussion. In one large lecture class a black student adamantly insisted that the Black Panthers were a non-violent do-gooder specializing in breakfast programs for school kids. Non-minority students would also hear all the official campus talk about the latest outreach initiative or upping retention of these students by offering majors in Black Studies or permitting “blacks only” student housing.

Whether regularly admitted students seriously interacted with diversity admittees is an unanswerable question but I suspect that intellectual back-and-forth was constrained. Campus self-imposed segregation was everywhere, and I cannot recall seeing any animated discussions among mixed race groups before or after class. I suspect that if this interaction did exist, it has dwindled with time given the dangers that now can result from race-related misunderstandings. Today’s white students know all about unintentional micro-aggressions and how such conversations can accidentally bring accusations of offensiveness. Better to keep chit-chat bland.

If the problems of dealing with struggling black students were bad enough, the administrative-mandated faculty diversification was far worse. These were top-down pushes to make numbers and often included “free money” if the right candidate were hired. The emphasis was strictly on race, never program needs so zero attention was paid to what a black job candidate might teach. Who cares if the department already offers two courses on black politics if a black job candidate could only offer a third while the position in, say, Asian politics went unfilled.? Nor did anybody express reservations about the lack of traditional scholarly qualifications, notably publications in major disciplinary journals. It was just assumed that affirmative action hires could not be held to high standards. Similarly, given the intense competition for decent candidates, an attractive black candidate might be enticed with a well-above market salary, zero teaching load for his first two years on the job, a generous research and travel budget and other lures that a white male could never demand.

Perhaps the worst aspect of this diversification was how it promoted political correctness. Savvy instructors learned to avoid all sensitive topics lest minority students were offended and claimed that they could not survive in such a poisonous environment. Don’t even mention The Bell Curve or hint that racial groups differ in criminality, illegitimacy etc. etc. Almost overnight, the range of what could be expressed in the classroom (and pursued in research) drastically narrowed. Science that produced the “wrong” results automatically became “bad” science. The very idea of debating the role of culture in economic attainment became unthinkable thanks to newly arrived diversity.

All in all, other than for the most zealous egalitarians, this was a failed experiment.

The Miracle

Outside of teaching a few graduate seminars here in New York, I left the academy in 2002 though I have tried to keep up with events. It thus came as a great surprise to me that between my departure and today, the campus has witnessed a Miracle—diversity has been transformed from a tolerable burden, a rocky initial step in the march toward racial equality into an immense, widely celebrated benefit.

Skeptics need only search Google to see the evidence. It would be impossible to summarize this literature so only a few examples must suffice. According to the research highlighted at the website Everfi, diversity enriches a student’s educational experience, improves his or her communication skills, challenges stereotypes, allows students to see themselves as leaders and better prepares them for today’s diverse workforce. To quote, “Ultimately, studies show that diversity on campus improves ‘intellectual engagement, self-motivation, citizenship and cultural engagement, and academic skills like critical thinking, problem solving, and writing – for students of all races. Interacting with diverse peers outside a classroom setting directly benefits students, making them better scholars, thinkers, and citizens.’”

Meanwhile the Center for American Progress (a non-partisan progressive thinktank) provides ten reasons why diversity is necessary on today’s campus. Among these are that a diverse campus will reflect America’s shifting demography, help to close race-related educational gaps, promote a more innovative and competitive workforce (vital for our global economy), make American firms more profitable, enhances national security and, lastly because the American public wants campus diversity.

Hardly surprising, the research on hiring a diverse faculty is likewise upbeat on its benefits. Typical is one academic study that argues that a diverse faculty may be especially valuable for minority students thanks to having role models who look and sound like them. In addition, all students will learn how to live in an increasingly diverse world while a diverse faculty will offer more diverse courses and thus expose all students to a wider range of ideas, teaching methods and scholarship. A different study demonstrates that upping faculty diversity will benefit college students since such faculty interacts more frequently with students than their white counterparts and use a broader range and more effective mix of pedagogical techniques.

A survey-based study at two medical schools reported that students believed that having diverse classmates greatly enhanced the quality of their education and thus supported current policies of affirmative action. At the risk of beating a dead horse, one highly scholarly, citation-rich review conclude that an ethnically diverse campus offer more varied educational experiences that both enhance learning and prepare these youngster for participation in a democratic society. And on and on.

These examples illustrate an overwhelming, uncontested consensus that diversity enhances education. Conceivably, contrary views exist, but I have yet to encounter a single example in “respectable” scholarly literature (the only possible exception are the writing of the non-academic Heather MacDonald).

It is impossible to exaggerate this alleged transformation—prior to this “miracle” an ill-prepared black student would likely be judged a liability since he could add little useful to classroom discussion and often had to be accommodated by lowering academic standards. Today, by contrast, his very presence helps classmates prepare for a more heterogeneous world, helps diminish negative race-related stereotypies all the while boosting US global economic competitiveness. Likewise, while a black Ph.D. might have once been hired despite his weak academic record, he or she now too, has become an educational asset by broadening the horizons of his white colleagues. What is remarkable about these studies is that they derive from institutions of higher learning and totally, absolutely and categorically avoid measuring any indicator of intellectual attainment.

This lopsided focus is hardly inevitable. It would not take much, for example, to assess whether ill-prepared black students thanks to a new critical mass of fellow students of color demonstrated higher levels of academic proficiency or now major in tougher subjects. Unfortunately, in today’s diversity-obsessed world it is more important that a black instructor convinces other blacks that they, too, can be professors versus helping them pass Organic Chemistry. No doubt, those searching for proof regarding the marvelous diversity miracle know full well that diversity hardly guarantees academic progress, no small matter given the academic accomplishment is the university’s pre-eminent mission.

Why this dramatic shift? Let me suggest that this abrupt change can only be explained by the a few-found ideological orthodoxy, what the Marxist would call the zigs and zags of history–the Party Line, so to speak.

Stripped of mendacious rhetoric, college admission with its promise of providing the magical diploma has become a tool to keep the peace and “promoting diversity” is the least embarrassing way to acquiesce to these political demands. Further justifying all those well-paid diversity bureaucrats—surely all their salaries must be accomplishing something. Yes, diversity admittees may have middling SAT scores and dreadful high school grades, gravitate to empty-calorie majors and stifle campus intellectual life, but their very presence on campus, regardless of classroom or disciplinary accomplishments or fields of study, contributes to our multicultural society and so they must be admitted. As for all those talented white (and Asian) males who will never be admitted or hired in a university, don’t fret—your willingness to step aside for members of historically under-represented groups is most gracious, and who knows, in a hundred years there may be campus statutes commemorating your sacrifice.

Today’s diversity mania with its dumbing down of the humanities and social sciences (and perhaps even the hard sciences) is, as they say, putting lipstick on a pig. And who cannot adore such a pig?

http://www.unz.com/article/the-diversity-miracle/

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4175219&forum_id=2#37571100)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 11th, 2019 12:44 AM
Author: diabolical degenerate shooting his goon (prince)

this is hate speech.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4175219&forum_id=2#37571167)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 11th, 2019 1:28 AM
Author: wesley willis (NOT a uspo alt)

You’re a pedophile.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4175219&forum_id=2#37571329)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 11th, 2019 1:40 AM
Author: diabolical degenerate shooting his goon (prince)

get over it, loser.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4175219&forum_id=2#37571410)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 11th, 2019 1:49 AM
Author: wesley willis (NOT a uspo alt)

Go to jail.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4175219&forum_id=2#37571440)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 11th, 2019 1:59 AM
Author: diabolical degenerate shooting his goon (prince)

get over it, loser.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4175219&forum_id=2#37571494)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 11th, 2019 4:21 PM
Author: wesley willis (NOT a uspo alt)

Jail. Now.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4175219&forum_id=2#37574957)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 11th, 2019 4:39 PM
Author: diabolical degenerate shooting his goon (prince)

get over it loser. spamming faggot spic low iq trash.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4175219&forum_id=2#37575082)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 12th, 2019 1:13 AM
Author: google starbucks (uspo)



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4175219&forum_id=2#37577457)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 11th, 2019 1:46 AM
Author: I}e $H /-\ u N

Pretty good rant. One usually writes better than this, though, with Jewish genetics and after he's spent 30 years in academia. It's laughably bad writing for a retired college professor.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4175219&forum_id=2#37571431)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 11th, 2019 1:48 AM
Author: diabolical degenerate shooting his goon (prince)

he made his point.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4175219&forum_id=2#37571436)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 11th, 2019 2:03 AM
Author: I}e $H /-\ u N

He did well straddling the fence, but to me, when it seemed time for him to spring his trap, his tone stayed leaden too long.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4175219&forum_id=2#37571515)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 11th, 2019 2:03 AM
Author: diabolical degenerate shooting his goon (prince)

alright, if thats how you feel. to me it seemed he spit fire.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4175219&forum_id=2#37571520)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 11th, 2019 1:49 AM
Author: ;;;..;..;;;..

lmao at this part of the rant: "Today’s diversity mania with its dumbing down of the humanities and social sciences"

Sorry but you can't "dumb down" an entirely useless field of study. I'm sure they really dumbed down that poli sci class!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4175219&forum_id=2#37571441)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 11th, 2019 1:53 AM
Author: 2 Front Doors

GREAT ARGUMENT, HURRRR DURRRRRRRRR

jfc

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4175219&forum_id=2#37571465)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 11th, 2019 1:55 AM
Author: ;;;..;..;;;..

(poli sci major that still couldn't get into law school, does drugs and will likely kill self by 35)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4175219&forum_id=2#37571474)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 11th, 2019 1:56 AM
Author: 2 Front Doors

that's wonderful, buddy. great contribution...

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4175219&forum_id=2#37571477)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 11th, 2019 1:56 AM
Author: ;;;..;..;;;..

(mental illness)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4175219&forum_id=2#37571480)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 11th, 2019 2:00 AM
Author: diabolical degenerate shooting his goon (prince)

oh, you cant make something dumb even dumber? great logic!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4175219&forum_id=2#37571498)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 12th, 2019 12:58 PM
Author: I}e $H /-\ u N



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4175219&forum_id=2#37579198)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 11th, 2019 2:40 AM
Author: *rnandy*.

are you nuts? of course humanities can (and have been) dumbed-down. polisci courses should be shit like reading the research behind duverger's law; not doing countless grievance studies classes with no standards.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4175219&forum_id=2#37571616)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 11th, 2019 12:14 PM
Author: ><<(^((*>



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4175219&forum_id=2#37573121)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 11th, 2019 11:16 AM
Author: I}e $H /-\ u N

I imagine he meant by dumbing down the staff's turning a blind eye to those students in PhD programs, for instance, who could not handle statistics.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4175219&forum_id=2#37572721)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 11th, 2019 11:37 AM
Author: .....;;,,.........;.;.;.;.,;,;,;.;.;,;


This isn't true of "the humanities" but it is true of complete bullshit fields like Sociology. Poli Sci, for instance, has a lot of work to do these days between everything that Trump/Brexit/neo-nationalism has raised, new research capabilities enabled by Data Science/Scientists and the complete revolution in media and communications that's occurred over the last 20 years. Similarly, Philosophy and "Theory" is pretty stuck in the 90s and in need of some breakthroughs. But Sociology will always be limited to groundbreaking insights like "it's hard for poor people to find shoes that fit because shoe sizes are more specific than the sizes of tops, bottoms and coats, so their selection at clothing donation bin is too limited."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4175219&forum_id=2#37572840)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 11th, 2019 12:17 PM
Author: Gloostick

The humanities had a long and prestigious history before the Judeo-parasite rats ruined it.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4175219&forum_id=2#37573147)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 11th, 2019 12:18 PM
Author: google starbucks (uspo)

tbf you have a warped perspective bc u went to a shitty college for people who got rejected from safety schools

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4175219&forum_id=2#37573157)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 11th, 2019 4:35 PM
Author: Taylor Swift was not a hobby she was a lifestyle

"Whether regularly admitted students seriously interacted with diversity admittees is an unanswerable question" was my favorite line. Hilarious rant.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4175219&forum_id=2#37575056)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 11th, 2019 4:41 PM
Author: Oh, you travel?

yeah he comes out with this now that he's retired and presumably living in some isolated fortress where he won't be harassed by America's "dreamers".

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4175219&forum_id=2#37575094)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 12th, 2019 12:53 AM
Author: *rnandy*.

well he retired in 2002; i don't think things were QUITE as bad back then.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4175219&forum_id=2#37577397)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 11th, 2019 4:42 PM
Author: THOT_RAVAGER

this essay is actually fucking hilarious, guy is a great writer

wtf i love jewish academics now

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4175219&forum_id=2#37575104)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 12th, 2019 1:03 AM
Author: ESL TM..,..;;. (🦈)



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4175219&forum_id=2#37577421)