\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Shitlibs now defending NEANDERTHALS slander by evil white men

I'm speechless https://www.google.com/amp/s/aeon.co/amp/ess...
honk honk
  03/14/19
Choice quotes:
honk honk
  03/14/19
Makes no sense, because all modern humans EXCEPT for blacks ...
.,.,...,..,.,.,:,,:,.,.,:::,....,:,..,:.:.,:.::,
  03/14/19
don't think that 15% number sounds right
dha tux
  03/14/19
1-5%
honk honk
  03/14/19
...
honk honk
  03/14/19
...
honk honk
  03/14/19


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: March 14th, 2019 4:16 PM
Author: honk honk

I'm speechless

https://www.google.com/amp/s/aeon.co/amp/essays/to-know-ourselves-we-must-first-know-the-neanderthals

This retard author keeps airquotting things no one said and just attributing them all to nameless white male oppressors being racist against Neanderthals

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4220879&forum_id=2#37931454)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 14th, 2019 4:27 PM
Author: honk honk
Subject: Choice quotes:

Contrary to what we once thought, they were far from brutish, ‘lesser’ beings, or mere evolutionary losers on a withered branch of our family tree

The Swedish botanist Carl Linnaeus formalised the ladder of life in 1758, when he crowned white European males as the ‘type specimen’ of our species. At a stroke of his pen, everyone else on the planet was demoted to a nonstandard, inferior version of humanity – identified by supposedly less advanced physiques, character and culture. In such a world, it was logical that the skull and bones from the Neander Valley were immediately compared with ethnic groups branded the most ‘brutal’ by their colonisers.

the English biologist Thomas Henry Huxley claimed a striking similarity between Neanderthal brow ridges and the ‘lowering, threatening expression’ he perceived in the skulls of Aboriginal peoples

they saw ‘scientific’ proof of the racist hierarchies that positioned non-Europeans as less evolved – although remaining puzzled that ‘savages’ nevertheless appeared to possess brains as big as those filling their own top hats

Up until the 1960s, scientists were still publishing theories of human evolution proposing that different races had budded off the human family tree sooner than others, with Caucasians the most recent arrivals, and therefore the least ‘primitive’

It was assumed that humans replaced Neanderthals without interbreeding – the implication being that Neanderthals could not compete with our ‘superior’ capacities

Palaeoanthropologists believed that Neanderthals’ social networks resembled chimpanzees’, in which members tend to treat ‘out-group’ counterparts as enemies to be driven away or eliminated, not fellows with whom to communicate or interact

It’s now clear that Neanderthals weren’t any less ‘evolved’ than us



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4220879&forum_id=2#37931524)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 14th, 2019 4:51 PM
Author: .,.,...,..,.,.,:,,:,.,.,:::,....,:,..,:.:.,:.::,


Makes no sense, because all modern humans EXCEPT for blacks have Neanderthal DNA (about 15% of our DNA is Neanderthal).

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4220879&forum_id=2#37931661)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 14th, 2019 8:08 PM
Author: dha tux ( )

don't think that 15% number sounds right

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4220879&forum_id=2#37932453)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 14th, 2019 8:46 PM
Author: honk honk

1-5%

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4220879&forum_id=2#37932633)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 14th, 2019 7:07 PM
Author: honk honk



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4220879&forum_id=2#37932147)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 14th, 2019 8:07 PM
Author: honk honk



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4220879&forum_id=2#37932444)