\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

GOP learns that elections have consequences

‘Now we’re in charge’: Dems freeze out GOP...
Beady-eyed Shaky Dog Poop
  03/25/19
...
narrow-minded apoplectic stage
  03/25/19
...
carnelian coffee pot
  03/25/19
burn all politicians at the stake
Onyx splenetic mexican
  03/25/19
I do. The GC GOP/Trump must be stopped to save America.
Beady-eyed Shaky Dog Poop
  03/25/19
...
narrow-minded apoplectic stage
  03/25/19
Will your wife love you more (or at all) if that happens?
Scarlet sanctuary idiot
  03/25/19
Nah. Our strong and loving relationship is rock solid regard...
Beady-eyed Shaky Dog Poop
  03/25/19
It was very 180. Have you started getting treatment today...
Scarlet sanctuary idiot
  03/25/19
Did my PT before work in between sets at the gym! Feeling go...
Beady-eyed Shaky Dog Poop
  03/25/19
I agree with Dems on this one. They have neither the Senate...
odious juggernaut piazza
  03/25/19


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: March 25th, 2019 7:51 AM
Author: Beady-eyed Shaky Dog Poop

‘Now we’re in charge’: Dems freeze out GOP on bipartisan bills

Republicans say Democrats are refusing to work with them on legislation in order to snub vulnerable members ahead of 2020.

By MELANIE ZANONA and SARAH FERRIS 03/25/2019 05:03 AM EDT

During the last two sessions of Congress, Democrat Bobby Rush and Republican Richard Hudson introduced legislation together to improve workforce-training programs.

But this year, Rush altered the language to the bill and stripped out a previous key element: Hudson.

“He reintroduced it, and he’s added all this money to it, and didn’t consult me,” the North Carolina Republican said.

Hudson is among several frustrated Republicans who have lashed out at their Democratic colleagues in recent days, arguing that Democrats have shut them out of the legislative process by refusing to work cooperatively on bills — including some they once co-authored.

Republicans claim Democrats, at the direction of their leadership, are determined to deny GOP incumbents any big victories heading into 2020 on a host of issues — from prescription drugs to immigration reform — and are dropping the bipartisan approach they seemed to promise during the last election.

Keep up with POLITICO Playbook

The 2020 Election. The New Congress. The Mueller Investigation. Be in the Know.

Email

Your email…

Sign Up

By signing up you agree to receive email newsletters or alerts from POLITICO. You can unsubscribe at any time.

Democrats have one response: Welcome to the minority.

Emboldened by their largest freshman class since Watergate, Democrats say they have every right to draft their dream bills without consulting the minority party. And they point out that they were rarely extended the same courtesy when the GOP ruled the House.

ADVERTISING

“I don’t have thin skin about this, but when they were in charge, they had the rules,” said Rep. Mike Doyle (D-Pa.), who has spent 25 years in the House, mostly in the minority. “Now we’re in charge, and maybe some of them don’t understand that yet.”

Rush’s office also argues the 72-year-old Illinois lawmaker is entitled to tweak the workforce legislation as he sees fit.

“Now that Rep. Rush is chairman, he decided to beef up the legislation by adding funding to make it easier for candidates who are going through training to receive wages while they are doing so,” said Ryan Johnson, a Rush spokesman. “Chairman Rush continues to reach out to Republicans in hopes that they will finally agree to fund this jobs program.”

Hudson says that when he confronted Rush about the perceived snub, he was told “‘We didn’t mean to exclude you from the process. We’d love to work with you.’” But according to Hudson, “I’m still waiting.”

Aides to Speaker Nancy Pelosi and House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer dismissed any notion that they’re intentionally stymieing GOP attempts at policymaking.

But so far in their new majority, Democrats have muscled ahead with an ambitious, mostly partisan agenda — as is typical in the House — including new gun control laws and a campaign finance overhaul.

Many Democrats also campaigned on issues where the two parties could find common ground, like infrastructure and drug pricing. Some House GOP lawmakers took that to mean Democrats would reach across the aisle in the new era of divided government — or else forfeit any chances of the bill making it to President Donald Trump’s desk.

Three months later, though, Republicans gripe they’ve been left out of areas that are ripe for compromise, a potentially ominous sign for bigger bipartisan priorities down the road.

Rep. Fred Upton (R-Mich.), a centrist and former GOP chairman, said he has specifically reached out to top House Democrats like Hoyer about their party’s bill to protect so-called Dreamers.

Schumer: Attorney General Barr must make the full Mueller report public

CONGRESS

Congress demands full Mueller report ahead of huge partisan fight

By KYLE CHENEY

“‘Don’t forget to include Republicans as a part of this,’” Upton said he told Hoyer. “But they haven’t yet. There are no co-sponsors. We’ve seen it coming, but there’s been no outreach.”

Florida GOP Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart said he, too, expected to hear from Democrats on Dreamers — one of his signature issues in recent years. Democrats unveiled their own plan last week to protect the young undocumented immigrants, with 214 co-sponsors, all Democrats.

“I feared that this was going to be Democratic leadership’s strategy — not trying to actually work in a way to put bills on the floor to become law, but on the contrary, doing it in a way that it won’t become law, just to score political points,” Diaz-Balart said.

Democrats say the GOP’s complaints show that they are struggling to adapt to the minority after eight years in charge, including two years controlling both chambers and the White House.

On Dreamers, Democratic aides say Republicans were the ones to ditch bipartisan talks last fall. No Republican currently in the House signed onto a similar Dreamer bill last year; it did have 10 Republican co-sponsors, but all were defeated or retired last November.

The lead author of the bill, Rep. Lucille Roybal-Allard (D-Calif.), added in a statement that she’s had “extensive and positive bipartisan meetings” about the bill before it was released.

Republicans are also fuming over Democrats’ decision to go it alone on bills to lower prescription drug costs — an area of earlier bipartisanship as well as a chief priority for Trump.

In the previous Congress, Republicans and Democrats negotiated several bipartisan pieces of legislation, including the so-called Creates Act, which would make it easier for cheaper generic drugs to come to market.

But one Republican lawmaker said he has repeatedly approached Rep. Anna Eshoo (D-Calif.), who chairs the Energy and Commerce subcommittee on health, about working together this year on the drug-pricing bills. The lawmaker, who requested anonymity to speak frankly, said discussions with Eshoo went nowhere.

Other Republicans on the same panel were caught off-guard when Democrats emailed the minority a package of already completed bills — including a revamped version of the Creates Act — and gave them one day to decide whether to co-sponsor it. Several GOP lawmakers ultimately did, though tensions spilled into public view during a hearing on the measures 10 days later.

“Bipartisanship is asking for my input, not just for my vote,” said Texas Rep. Michael Burgess, the top Republican on the health subcommittee. “Giving a member less than 24 hours to sign onto a piece of legislation they have never seen is discourteous, especially when we have said at each hearing thus far this Congress that we are willing to work in a bipartisan way.”

The office of Rep. Frank Pallone (D-N.J.), who chairs the Energy and Commerce Committee, however, pointed out that several of the bills, including the new Creates Act, have garnered bipartisan support this year.

Pramila Jayapal

CONGRESS

Meet the woman mentoring Omar, Tlaib and Ocasio-Cortez

By HEATHER CAYGLE and SARAH FERRIS

Democrats have notched several bipartisan wins in the new Congress, even on some of the left’s top priorities, like gun control. The party’s signature universal background check bill had five Republicans as original co-sponsors and eight voted for it on the floor. And at a recent news conference, Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick (R-Pa.) stood side by side with Pelosi as she rolled out a bill to expand the nation’s landmark domestic violence bill, the Violence Against Women Act.

In her return to power, Pelosi and her top deputies have committed to putting the vast majority of their bills through a slog of markups — with ample time for amendments from both sides — before they headed to the floor. The speaker has also made clear Democrats will pursue their agenda without being constrained by the right.

“In the legislative process, you cannot confine yourself to what the other side might do on any given day. Otherwise, you might just as well just stay home,” she said at news conference in Missouri last week. “We’re not staying at home. We are there to make the fight in the House.”

Many senior Democrats say they do want GOP co-sponsors and have pushed back against claims that they’re pursuing a strict party-line agenda.

Doyle, who leads a subcommittee on communication and technology, said he was stunned when House Republicans accused him of sidelining them on net neutrality legislation after 24 years of working in a bipartisan fashion on a slew of issues.

The Pennsylvania Democrat said he’d worked hard to incorporate some GOP concerns into his net neutrality bill, though his effort was barely noticed by Republicans.

Three Republicans, Reps. Bob Latta of Ohio, Greg Walden of Oregon and Cathy McMorris Rodgers of Washington state, laced into at Doyle at a tense hearing this month, and all released competing bills with no notice to Democrats.

“I said, ‘Great, I must have missed the phone call when you guys said you were going to drop this,’” Doyle quipped. “If someone came up to me and said, ‘Hey, I have a bill ... I probably would have said, ‘Instead of dropping the bill, why don’t you just come over and bring it to me?’”

“That, to me, isn’t the way you want to work with someone,” he added.

https://www.politico.com/story/2019/03/25/congress-bipartisan-bills-1230293

180! Should have passed your legislation before Trump lost you the House, Shitcons.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4228453&forum_id=2#37985582)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 25th, 2019 7:56 AM
Author: narrow-minded apoplectic stage



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4228453&forum_id=2#37985592)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 25th, 2019 7:57 AM
Author: carnelian coffee pot



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4228453&forum_id=2#37985594)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 25th, 2019 7:58 AM
Author: Onyx splenetic mexican

burn all politicians at the stake

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4228453&forum_id=2#37985596)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 25th, 2019 7:59 AM
Author: Beady-eyed Shaky Dog Poop

I do. The GC GOP/Trump must be stopped to save America.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4228453&forum_id=2#37985598)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 25th, 2019 8:01 AM
Author: narrow-minded apoplectic stage



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4228453&forum_id=2#37985599)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 25th, 2019 9:12 AM
Author: Scarlet sanctuary idiot

Will your wife love you more (or at all) if that happens?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4228453&forum_id=2#37985740)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 25th, 2019 9:18 AM
Author: Beady-eyed Shaky Dog Poop

Nah. Our strong and loving relationship is rock solid regardless!

How was your weekend bro? Hope it was really 180.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4228453&forum_id=2#37985767)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 25th, 2019 9:55 AM
Author: Scarlet sanctuary idiot

It was very 180.

Have you started getting treatment today?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4228453&forum_id=2#37985907)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 25th, 2019 9:58 AM
Author: Beady-eyed Shaky Dog Poop

Did my PT before work in between sets at the gym! Feeling good. Ankle will be 100% in a few weeks just in time for running season.

Gonna be a 1800000 summer! Cant wait.

Glad you had a good weekend bro :-)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4228453&forum_id=2#37985922)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 25th, 2019 10:07 AM
Author: odious juggernaut piazza

I agree with Dems on this one. They have neither the Senate nor the White House. If they want to write up show bills to campaign on that have 0.000000% chance of becoming law, why should they have to water them down just because some republican asks? Their choice is pretty clear: either work with the GOP if you want to market your bill as "bipartisan" or be able to bitch that the GOP rejected a "bipartisan proposal" (or, obviously, if you want your bill to become law... but I'm assuming that's not what we're talking about here); or just draft the bill you want on your own if you're in a progressive district or if this is just something where the campaign ad you're planning in your head doesn't require you to use the "bipartisan" buzzword.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4228453&forum_id=2#37985972)