The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Am I a "Jewish Supremacist"? y/n?
Poast new message in this thread
Date: March 26th, 2019 2:02 PM Author: Flirting old irish cottage heaven (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4229484&forum_id=2#37993526) |
Date: March 26th, 2019 2:06 PM Author: Talented lavender space honestly, not really
it's like calling women "female supremacists" just because they go around agitating for preferential treatment. despite almost every woman doing this, very very few women believe they are actually "superior" to men
you don't coherently believe that jews are superior to non-jews, you're just a gay guy with a female soul who wants preferential treatment without ever thinking beyond that point |
 |
Date: March 26th, 2019 2:07 PM Author: pink fiercely-loyal stead he's mostly a non-dogmatic attention whore and likes to play with different ideas UNLESS he feels like the jewish community is under attack, in which case he has an overpowering emotional reaction which supersedes everything he had discussed or played around with previously (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4229484&forum_id=2#37993553) |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 2:33 PM Author: Black sneaky criminal (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4229484&forum_id=2#37993742) |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 2:38 PM Author: Coral regret stage (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4229484&forum_id=2#37993782) |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 2:46 PM Author: Wine comical scourge upon the earth point (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4229484&forum_id=2#37993827) |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 2:19 PM Author: Coral regret stage I would classify many feminists as female supramicists, just as I’d classify UJ as a Jewish supramicist. The feminist is a great analogy though.
You really don’t think that these women don’t feel superior to or better than men? |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 2:33 PM Author: Talented lavender space no, they really don't. in fact most of them secretly believe men are superior. that's why they still beg to be dominated in the bedroom, and if they're ever lucky enough to snag a real man, they mysteriously morph into a submissive housewife. even the most diehard "feminists" are just penis envy nutjobs who are jealous of male "superiority"
jews also carry around an inferiority complex wrt white people, which is why they are so butthurt by us and resent us so much, but it's not quite the same thing |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 2:37 PM Author: Black sneaky criminal (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4229484&forum_id=2#37993775) |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 2:39 PM Author: Coral regret stage Interesting points. What resentment do Jews have towards white people? They seem to see themselves as superior. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4229484&forum_id=2#37993787) |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 2:48 PM Author: Wine comical scourge upon the earth point Nah. If they did they would just convert/intermarry. Read how the Kushners treated Karlie Kloss.
Now, you can say "but TMF, they already intermarry at some enormous rate and convert often too." Yeah, but then ask yourself who stays behind. There's your answer. |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 2:40 PM Author: Wine comical scourge upon the earth point Yes. I think you fundamentally think Jews are better and that it is a central part of your identity. You will argue for things that benefit Jews at the expense of everyone else, like giving Israel $1 billion every year.
That said, you're better than DBG, Are Reptile and some others on here. |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 2:40 PM Author: Coral regret stage We give them closer to $4 billion a year, no? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4229484&forum_id=2#37993796) |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 2:42 PM Author: Wine comical scourge upon the earth point Do we really? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4229484&forum_id=2#37993807) |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 2:44 PM Author: Coral regret stage $3.8 billion a year, solely for military aid:
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/14/world/middleeast/israel-benjamin-netanyahu-military-aid.html
I’m sure there’s a shitload of other money they leech from us. |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 2:46 PM Author: Wine comical scourge upon the earth point And I suspect UJTP would defend any amount. $5 billion? Great! $10 billion? Even better! And that's the answer to the OP.
|
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 2:50 PM Author: Coral regret stage He’s more deceptive than that.
First, he’d mislead by downplaying the amount of $$$ Israel leeches from us. Wouldn’t be surprised if he cited the fake $1 billion figure and that’s where you got it from.
Second, he’d deflect, as he always does, by pointing at others such as Saudi Arabia and Egypt. Anything to take the focus off of Israel.
Third, he’d gloss over it by getting into some word vomit about how Israeli values are American values, with the implication that more $$$ is a good thing.
Finally, he’d tell you he’s all for questioning the US/Israeli relationship, only under a ridiculous set of conditions which effectively means you can’t question at all.
He’d never be as open about it as you suggest. |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 2:53 PM Author: Wine comical scourge upon the earth point Or he might try to pretend that the US gets value that justifies that, like that Israel sells weapons to the US (I recall this actually happened in a thread). Then you point out that this isn't included in that price, that the US pays for those weapons like any number of other countries that buy from Israel. He then deflects and is like "omg, you're a JEW!" or "I guess that couldn't buy you a rimjob!" or other assorted bullshit. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4229484&forum_id=2#37993870) |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 4:25 PM Author: Shaky theater stage water buffalo (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4229484&forum_id=2#37994562) |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 4:25 PM Author: Shaky theater stage water buffalo (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4229484&forum_id=2#37994557) |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 2:44 PM Author: Wine comical scourge upon the earth point You win. https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2016/09/united-states-israel-memorandum-of-understanding-military-aid/500192/
Holy shit. That is totally batshit insane. |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 2:43 PM Author: Know-it-all wonderful masturbator university yes (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4229484&forum_id=2#37993814) |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 4:19 PM Author: Coral regret stage 20 responses and not a single one agrees with Upset Jew.
Nothing out of the ordinary. Time for him to memory hole this thread and pretend nothing happened. |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 4:23 PM Author: Flirting old irish cottage heaven Poasters above clearly state I am not. You're playing yourself yet again.
Edit: And look no further than TMF as my detractor. What a shocker, because I come for his shitty Newark suburbs and no-rim-job lifestyle. What a joke. |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 4:24 PM Author: Coral regret stage Not “poasters,” one, who basically says you are too female and stupid to be capable of harboring a conscious feeling of superiority. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4229484&forum_id=2#37994546) |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 4:24 PM Author: Know-it-all wonderful masturbator university (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4229484&forum_id=2#37994549) |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 4:25 PM Author: Flirting old irish cottage heaven Actually, GOY SUPERSTAR and then a pumo who basically say I am a non-dogmatic attention whore, and that pumo got three bumps, so 5 people in fact agree I am not a Jewish Supremacist. You lose. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4229484&forum_id=2#37994560) |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 4:27 PM Author: Coral regret stage I always win, as that pumo is the one I quoted and who described how you are a Jewish supremacist. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4229484&forum_id=2#37994583) |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 4:32 PM Author: Flirting old irish cottage heaven Then why does he state definitively here, that I am not, in a thread directly relating to whether or not I am one?
You lost. Your deflecting now is coming off weird and desperate. |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 4:33 PM Author: Know-it-all wonderful masturbator university christ arent you monkey people supposed to be high verbal IQ?
seriously what was the point of all of that inbreeding if you cant even fucking read after a few generations?
|
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 4:34 PM Author: Flirting old irish cottage heaven Relax (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4229484&forum_id=2#37994642) |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 4:34 PM Author: Coral regret stage He doesn’t “definitively” state that here. You are just lying. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4229484&forum_id=2#37994650) |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 4:35 PM Author: Flirting old irish cottage heaven "Date: March 26th, 2019 2:07 PM Author: .;.;...;.;...;.;.;;;.;.;..;..;.
he's mostly a non-dogmatic attention whore and likes to play with different ideas UNLESS he feels like the jewish community is under attack, in which case he has an overpowering emotional reaction which supersedes everything he had discussed or played around with previously
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4229484&forum_id=2#37993553)
= Jewish Supremacist? |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 4:36 PM Author: Coral regret stage That isn’t “definitively” stating that you are not a Jewish supremacist.
You are lying or stupid. |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 4:38 PM Author: Flirting old irish cottage heaven We both agree this poaster is not describing me as a Jewish Supremacist, correct? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4229484&forum_id=2#37994679) |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 4:39 PM Author: Coral regret stage No (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4229484&forum_id=2#37994690) |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 4:39 PM Author: Flirting old irish cottage heaven So you believe he is describing me as a Jewish Supremacist, just without stating that at any point in his poa? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4229484&forum_id=2#37994699) |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 4:44 PM Author: Coral regret stage Everything he says after “unless” describes you as a Jewish Supremacist.
Please quote to where he “definitively” states that you are not one, if you know what definitively means. |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 4:47 PM Author: Flirting old irish cottage heaven So "he feels like the jewish community is under attack, in which case he has an overpowering emotional reaction which supersedes everything he had discussed or played around with previously" is your definition of "Jewish Supremacist" ?
To me he is describing me here in the way he perceives me which in no way relates to being a "Jewish Supremacist", hence definitively he believes I am not as I assume he would have responded simply with "yes" to the OP. If he does think this, he could clear it up easily.
Additionally, GOYSUPERSTAR states I am not, but you *shockingly* didn't respond to that one. |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 4:48 PM Author: Coral regret stage There you go again, back to spreading easily disprovable lies.
Not only did I directly respond to GOY SUPERSTAR, I addressed it here:
http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=4229484&mc=50&forum_id=2#37994546 |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 4:51 PM Author: pink fiercely-loyal stead I clarified below
http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=4229484&mc=55&forum_id=2#37994740 |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 4:59 PM Author: Coral regret stage Ok, he responded below and says as a Jew, he does not think you are a Jewish supremacist, but that you are dishonest about your intense tribal loyalty to Jews, as you won’t acknowledge it intellectually.
So in this one limited instance, you are right about his meaning, though it was not “definitive.” |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 5:00 PM Author: Flirting old irish cottage heaven LOL
thanks for the acknowledgement Lieman8 |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 5:02 PM Author: Coral regret stage You don’t get to lie with impunity and then accuse others of lies.
Such as this:
“Additionally, GOYSUPERSTAR states I am not, but you *shockingly* didn't respond to that one.” |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 5:03 PM Author: Flirting old irish cottage heaven Deflecting much? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4229484&forum_id=2#37994893) |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 4:39 PM Author: Know-it-all wonderful masturbator university "The more I argued with them, the better I came to know their dialectic. First they counted on the stupidity of their adversary, and then, when there was no other way out, they themselves simply played stupid. If all this didn't help, they pretended not to understand, or, if challenged, they changed the subject in a hurry, quoted platitudes which, if you accepted them, they immediately related to entirely different matters, and then, if again attacked, gave ground and pretended not to know exactly what you were talking about." (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4229484&forum_id=2#37994697) |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 4:40 PM Author: Flirting old irish cottage heaven Whoa that quote has never been poasted before that's such a cool and edgy thing! and in this thread! wow! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4229484&forum_id=2#37994710) |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 4:44 PM Author: Know-it-all wonderful masturbator university "If all this didn't help, they pretended not to understand, or, if challenged, they changed the subject in a hurry, quoted platitudes which, if you accepted them, they immediately related to entirely different matters, and then, if again attacked, gave ground and pretended not to know exactly what you were talking about." (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4229484&forum_id=2#37994753) |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 4:44 PM Author: Flirting old irish cottage heaven Wow, that's actually so witty and high, to retort with that! 180! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4229484&forum_id=2#37994762) |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 4:45 PM Author: Know-it-all wonderful masturbator university Relax (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4229484&forum_id=2#37994771) |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 4:49 PM Author: Flirting old irish cottage heaven No (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4229484&forum_id=2#37994801) |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 4:49 PM Author: Shaky theater stage water buffalo (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4229484&forum_id=2#37994797) |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 4:43 PM Author: pink fiercely-loyal stead I don't think you believe that Jews are necessarily "better" than goys, but you do have a tribal allegiance to Jews that you feel deeply on an emotional level (at the expense of other groups, if necessary) ...and that you don't really want to acknowledge intellectually. Acknowledging your biases only strengthens your arguments, imo; ignoring or deflecting them weakens them.
i'm jewish btw |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 8:17 PM Author: Wine comical scourge upon the earth point Do you think DBG or Are Reptile are Jewish supremacists? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4229484&forum_id=2#37996079) |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 4:36 PM Author: Flirting old irish cottage heaven Date: March 26th, 2019 2:06 PM Author: GOY SUPERSTAR
honestly, not really it's like calling women "female supremacists" just because they go around agitating for preferential treatment. despite almost every woman doing this, very very few women believe they are actually "superior" to men
you don't coherently believe that jews are superior to non-jews, you're just a gay guy with a female soul who wants preferential treatment without ever thinking beyond that point"
= Jewish Supremacist? |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 4:19 PM Author: pink fiercely-loyal stead thread didnt go the way heeb wanted (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4229484&forum_id=2#37994510) |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 4:41 PM Author: Lascivious hell doctorate No, never really got that sense. Just a conservative minded Jew who sees his people as redeemable. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4229484&forum_id=2#37994717) |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 4:42 PM Author: Flirting old irish cottage heaven thanks (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4229484&forum_id=2#37994738) |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 4:45 PM Author: Lascivious hell doctorate I think you ramped up DBG goyposting in response to attacks, which is pretty natural. But it created a feedback loop. If you had a moniker without Jew in it I doubt people would have ever come after you. At least not as much (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4229484&forum_id=2#37994769) |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 4:50 PM Author: chrome sex offender his moniker is 180 one of my favorites ever (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4229484&forum_id=2#37994806) |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 5:02 PM Author: Flirting old irish cottage heaven (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4229484&forum_id=2#37994881) |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 4:50 PM Author: angry orange cruise ship you're a narcissist more than anything else (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4229484&forum_id=2#37994804) |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 4:51 PM Author: Coral regret stage That is letting him off too easy. It goes way beyond mere narcissism, and his attitude is why he makes threads like this:
http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=4199897&mc=183&forum_id=2 |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 5:01 PM Author: Flirting old irish cottage heaven You pick the strangest fights, even after conceding you're wrong. You're really off the reservation lately. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4229484&forum_id=2#37994879) |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 5:03 PM Author: Coral regret stage How am I wrong? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4229484&forum_id=2#37994892) |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 5:03 PM Author: Know-it-all wonderful masturbator university Some other Jew said he's not a Kike Supremacist. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4229484&forum_id=2#37994899) |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 5:04 PM Author: Flirting old irish cottage heaven See, even low IQ GOY sees what you can't/won't see. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4229484&forum_id=2#37994902) |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 5:08 PM Author: Coral regret stage I already admitted that I misread his poast, which did not “definitively” state what you claimed, and needed his further clarification.
But as your “ally” in this thread, he is calling you dishonest in how you present yourself in Jewish issues. Your other “ally” says you are too female and stupid to consciously conceive of Jews as being superior. Really rousing support for your side. |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 5:09 PM Author: Flirting old irish cottage heaven LOL, now you "misread" it?? JFC! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4229484&forum_id=2#37994931) |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 5:12 PM Author: Coral regret stage You should ask yourself why no one thinks you are capable of engaging honestly/in good faith on Jewish issues. Maybe your “allies” don’t think you are actually a Jewish Supremacist, but they don’t think that you are honest. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4229484&forum_id=2#37994948) |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 5:16 PM Author: Flirting old irish cottage heaven They're accusing me of having feminine birdbrain tendencies to forego my convictions if I perceive a "tribal loyalty" is threatened, that's different than being intentionally dishonest. I have admitted falling back into bad thinking patterns at times, like after the synagogue attack I questioned Trump rhetoric having something to do with motivating fringe types. An unfortunate blemish on my record that I admitted right after. I have never been dishonest about who I am and if that is what some people think, I've no desire to disabuse them of the notion. But Jewish Supremacist? Gimme a break? And you back tracking ITT? Pathetic. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4229484&forum_id=2#37994972) |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 5:20 PM Author: Coral regret stage I’m not backtracking, you idiot.
I originally said only one poaster didn’t think you were a Jewish Supremacist. I misread a second poaster, who correctly said you were dishonest on Jewish issues due to your intense tribal loyalty which you don’t admit. I thought this meant he also regarded you as a Jewish Supremacist, but he later said it didn’t. I admitted my initial mistake because I’m honest. This is not backtracking.
The entire reason you made this thread and why I commented to begin with, is because you don’t engage honestly or in good faith on Jewish issues. |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 5:22 PM Author: Flirting old irish cottage heaven IF that pumo never came out and said what he said, you'd still be arguing he said I'm a Jewish Supremacist.
This thread was made specifically, to see who agrees with the notion that I am - a notion you seem to propagate. Now you've back tracked into your usual "well you're tribal and don't engage honestly on Jewish issues", whatever that means.
I've said all I need to say though.
This has been a very poor showing for you. |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 5:34 PM Author: Coral regret stage You are right that I’d still be arguing that, because the pumo did not “definitively” state anything as you claimed. When he clarified, he provided an actual declarative statement. You may want to look up what “definitively” means because you seem unaware.
Also, you have very poor reading comp. I didn’t backtrack from a thing. I still think you are a Jewish Supremacist. It’s that Jewish pumo who doesn’t think so, and says that you are so tribal. |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 5:13 PM Author: Shaky theater stage water buffalo (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4229484&forum_id=2#37994954) |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 5:15 PM Author: Wine comical scourge upon the earth point One question to UJTP: why do you start threads like these? Do you just want to argue over some nonsense? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4229484&forum_id=2#37994968) |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 5:17 PM Author: Flirting old irish cottage heaven I posed a question.
If it's nonsense, why did you bother showing up ITT? |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 5:22 PM Author: Wine comical scourge upon the earth point Because it is fun to see you in these threads. They always go something like this:
1. As a question where inevitably a bunch of XOers will immediately give you an answer you don't like.
2. You then proceed to argue with the XOers giving answers you don't like, incredulous that the totally predictable outcome came to pass.
It would be like me starting a thread where I ask "hey, would you XOers like to be my friend irl?" and when people answered "no" I go "wtf, YES YOU WOULD!" |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 5:23 PM Author: Flirting old irish cottage heaven Actually, I didn't mind most of the answers and yours I typically ignore bc they're in place simply to troll your anti-UJ agenda.
HOWEVER, when your wife finally does lick your asshole, you'll thank me. |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 7:56 PM Author: Wine comical scourge upon the earth point You think I have an anti-UJ agenda? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4229484&forum_id=2#37995956) |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 7:58 PM Author: Flirting old irish cottage heaven Which is odd, considering I'm so Pro-TMF (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4229484&forum_id=2#37995966) |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 8:00 PM Author: Wine comical scourge upon the earth point lolvat (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4229484&forum_id=2#37995974) |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 8:01 PM Author: Coral regret stage You frequently demolish him, so he needs a convenient excuse to completely ignore your substance.
Guess he’s settled on your “anti-UJ agenda.” |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 8:03 PM Author: Flirting old irish cottage heaven (guy who 'misreads' a lot) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4229484&forum_id=2#37995994) |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 8:04 PM Author: Coral regret stage In your mind, once is a lot. That’s because you are dishonest (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4229484&forum_id=2#37996000) |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 8:04 PM Author: Flirting old irish cottage heaven Once is what you "admit" to. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4229484&forum_id=2#37996005) |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 8:08 PM Author: Coral regret stage No, that is me being nice and crediting you because the pumo ultimately clarified.
You said he “definitively” stated something, when he did not, because you don’t know what that word means. |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 8:10 PM Author: Flirting old irish cottage heaven In actuality we both know what he meant, yet you weaseled your way out of a coherent explanation by implying that you knew that he was arguing I'm a Jewish Supremacist in a roundabout way and had explicitly said as much before, said you would have kept up this fallacious argument had the pumo not "clarified" for you and then plucked the excuse of "misreading" him from the ether as if anyone would take this pathetic back track seriously.
Do better Lieman8. |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 8:13 PM Author: Coral regret stage No, this is word vomit.
In actuality, he didn’t “definitively” state anything and you either dishonestly claimed otherwise or simply didn’t know what that word meant. From the context in his poast, railing on you, seemed like he thought you were a supremacist. He then clarified and thought you were not. His clarification was needed because nothing was “definitively” stated the first time around. |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 8:17 PM Author: Flirting old irish cottage heaven Nope, sorry you don't get to brush off what you can't substantively address as "word vomit".
I told you his response indicated he was definitively denying I was a Jewish Supremacist. This was obvious to me and should be obvious to anyone with basic reading comp, but you chose to argue otherwise for unknown/disingenuous reasons, because you're pushing the opposite P.O.V. It's a typical move you play that I am more keen to notice now.
I had him clarify to consummately pwn you into admitting your dishonest argument, but instead you come with some Hillary Clinton-esque deflection of I "misread" him. You also claimed this is the same pumo that definitively CALLED me a JS and whose defintion of which you claimed to subscribe to.
You look like an idiot here on many levels, more than I have even listed here, and we can keep going if you like. |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 8:21 PM Author: Coral regret stage Except he didn’t definitively deny you were a Jewish Supremacist in his original poast. From the context, it seemed like he was saying you were one. People don’t have to reply “yes” if they give reasons that support the “yes” answer.
His clarification was needed precisely because he didn’t state anything definitively. When he replied, only then did he definitively state his position. I seriously don’t think you know what “definitively” means. And him attacking you in the other thread, the one you refer to now, is part of the context for why I thought his original poast here did in fact call you a Jewish Supremacist.
We can also keep going on you, such as when you lied about me never responding to GOY SUPERSTAR |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 8:23 PM Author: Flirting old irish cottage heaven Weird how it was obvious to me and not you. Your autism filter is either higher than normal or maybe you do indeed need to read more carefully. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4229484&forum_id=2#37996126) |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 8:33 PM Author: Coral regret stage It wasn’t “definitively” stated, which is the point of this subthread (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4229484&forum_id=2#37996192) |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 8:40 PM Author: Flirting old irish cottage heaven Another back track, because you've been exposed on every other point, so we've whittled it down to this one issue, which is also not correct.
It was definitively stated, just not definitively enough for you to "grasp" it I guess. I don't think you "misread" as much as you "read into".
Or, in other words, to not respond "yes" to a yes or no question is a definitive "no". |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 8:46 PM Author: Coral regret stage What do you mean “another back track?” You like to throw words around without knowing what they mean. Nothing has changed.
It wasn’t definitively stated. If it was, you simply could have quoted the definitive statement. Like you could in his reply, where he did make a definitive statement.
I did read too much into it and I should have said that rather than “misread.” And your last sentence is wrong. |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 8:53 PM Author: Flirting old irish cottage heaven I mean when you're unable to address things, we eventually whittle it down to some side issue wherein you finally have no room to skirt your way out of something. It's just an observation of your argumentation style. Rather than admit defeat you would rather go down side roads to claim some level of vindication via equivocation or "re-explaining" something.
He wrote:
Reply Favorite
Date: March 26th, 2019 2:07 PM Author: .;.;...;.;...;.;.;;;.;.;..;..;.
he's mostly a non-dogmatic attention whore and likes to play with different ideas UNLESS he feels like the jewish community is under attack, in which case he has an overpowering emotional reaction which supersedes everything he had discussed or played around with previously
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4229484&forum_id=2#37993553)
This was in response to a guy who said "Honestly, not really":
Date: March 26th, 2019 2:06 PM Author: GOY SUPERSTAR
honestly, not really it's like calling women "female supremacists" just because they go around agitating for preferential treatment. despite almost every woman doing this, very very few women believe they are actually "superior" to men
you don't coherently believe that jews are superior to non-jews, you're just a gay guy with a female soul who wants preferential treatment without ever thinking beyond that point
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4229484&forum_id=2#37993546)
He latches onto a poaster who definitively states I'm not a Jewish Supremacist and definitively agrees with him and expounds on his other, unrelated points.
Additionally, the last sentence is correct, I either am one or I am not one. It's like being wet or not wet. And it's extremely clear from his poast that he believes I am not. You, with your clear belief that I am, claimed all these poasters "disagree" with me, which was also not correct, because you can't "disagree" with a yes or no proposition.
In his follow up, the pumo isn't "more definitive" or "finally definitive", he is merely more explicit.
|
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 9:10 PM Author: Coral regret stage It really amazes me how frequently you project. You do realize that you’ve been exposed on most points here, and are latching onto my “misreading” of one poast, hammering on it again and again here and in other threads, purely as some sort of mechanism for claiming victory? I am playing YOUR game by focusing on this, not the other way around.
In this thread, basically everyone bashed you, including the pumo. There were a number of people who did not think that you were a Jewish Supremacist, admittedly a higher number of people than I would have expected, but I never claimed that everyone agrees that you are one. What I claim is that on Israel and Jewish issues, literally no one agrees with you except DBG, and that’s true.
This thread also exposes MY point: that everyone agrees you are not an honest actor on Israel and with Jewish issues generally. Even your “allies” here say that.
And YOU are the one frequently backtracking on this minor distraction you’ve decided to magnify. Here’s what you originally said:
“Date: March 26th, 2019 4:32 PM Author: Upset Jew
Then why does he state definitively here, that I am not, in a thread directly relating to whether or not I am one?”
http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=4229484&mc=95&forum_id=2#37994621
Your “he” refers to the pumo. Your “that I am not” refers to the pumo “definitively” stating that you are not a Jewish Supremacist. And, as we all know, and is evidenced by the quotes you posted, the pumo NEVER definitively stated that you were not a Jewish Supremacist.
Now you have backtracked, and tried to claim that the pumo “definitively agreed” with someone else who did in fact definitively state that you are not a Jewish Supremacist. Not only is this a backtrack, but he didn’t “definitively agree” with this either. He didn’t explicitly disagree with him, but this is not the same thing at all. And from the surrounding context, such as the pumo previously bashing you, it is reasonable to interpret his original comment as saying that you were a Jewish Supremacist due to your intense tribal loyalty that you are dishonest about.
I really think you need to look up what “definitively” actually means. I will help you:
Definition of definitive (Entry 1 of 2) 1 : serving to provide a final solution or to end a situation a definitive victory could not give a definitive diagnosis 2 : authoritative and apparently exhaustive a definitive critical biography 3a : serving to define or specify precisely
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/definitive
In other words, it’s a synonym for explicitly. And it does not require a ton of word vomit to determine if something is “definitive” or not.
And yes, in his follow up, it is only then that he makes a definitive statement that you are not a Jewish supremacist. |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 9:41 PM Author: Flirting old irish cottage heaven Lawman, that entire exchange opens with a "not really" - as an answer to my question. The other characteristics they claim I have are unrelated to the central question. I am not back tracking at all. They definitively state I am not - that means, with certainty, with clarity. We can debate about the degree of how definitive, but the answer is a CLEAR "no", and there is no equivocation. You then move away from "Jewish Supremacist" into other features and who "agrees" with me, as if that is relevant at all to the central question I posed - it's not. You can be definitive without being entirely explicit, spelling it out. And I keep bringing up the "misreading" because that was such an obvious cop out - usually your side-winding will involve at least some related tangent, while dodging the central question, whereas this was a reach into the ether of nothingness and pulling back a lame excuse.
Additionally, it is not reasonable to assume he is saying I am a Jewish Supremacist, when he a) never says I am b) agrees strongly with a poaster who clearly says I am not and c) expounds on why he thinks the way he does. His core answer to the relevant question is clear in his response and in that exchange.
As far as your claim that "only DBG" agrees with me on Israel and Jewish issues is so broad and vague it's really not worth addressing. You would have to define what those issues are and I'd have to give a substantive point of view of them, and I certainly haven't covered more than a small subset of my POVs on here w/r/t Israel and Jewish issues.
You've still been unable to even articulate what you mean by "Jewish Supremacist", what the defining or qualifying features are and how I meet the criteria. You seem to just continue to lower the bar until I somehow fit the mold. But you've never provided a workable context for the accusation.
So please don't tell me you're playing "my" game. You're playing "a" game, and losing when you get called out on it. That's the difference.
|
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 9:57 PM Author: Coral regret stage You backtracked from originally saying the pumo "definitively" said you were not a Jewish supremacist, to just before, claiming the pumo merely "definitively" agreed with someone else who said that.
The sudo did indeed start by saying "not really." Know what that means? That means he definitively answered the question in the negative. Unfortunately for you, the sudo is not the pumo, who did not "definitively" answer the question. While it is true that one can be definitive without entirely spelling it all out, that's not what occurred.
The pumo also didn't strongly agree with the sudo who clearly said you weren't a Jewish Supremacist anyway. You have a habit of mischaracterizing what people say, but unable to actually provide any quotes. As I explained to you, he never explicitly disagreed with the sudo. And at no point did he "strongly agree" with the sudo. That's just an interpretation you (correctly) read into.
The actual reason you kept hammering at this point is in a misguided effort to claim total victory. Not because it was a "lame excuse" or an "obvious copout." But so you could pretend it was some major concession that justifies you making this false statement and then building an argument around it:
"You pick the strangest fights, even after conceding you're wrong."
http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=4229484&forum_id=2#37994879
I did articulate what I meant by Jewish Supremacist in the other thread. You just deny being one, and I don't believe your denial. Admittedly, I can't clearly articulate what I mean, yet, but the core of it is that the only issue you truly care about, judging from your hysterical reactions, is what is good for Israel and the Jewish people generally? It colors your entire worldview.
As an example, if Trump supports Israel, you'd overlook all of his other faults and generally still defend him. But if he was perfect in most respects but shat on Israel and cut their funding, you'd hate him. Everything else he did would be secondary. |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 10:28 PM Author: Black sneaky criminal Jewboy is done here. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4229484&forum_id=2#37996967) |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 11:02 PM Author: Flirting old irish cottage heaven To be clear, I am not backtracking. I merely provided further evidence for pumo's definitive thought in response to postulate in OP. That evidence being he agreed strongly with the poaster who was more explicit in definitively saying I am not a Jewish Supremacist and the pumo, ipso facto, is equally definitive. However the pumo's statement taken alone is enough that one can clearly know what he thinks - he is definitive. Like me being either a Jewish Supremacist or not, he is either definitive in his reckoning of me as a JS or not, and his answer is negative. The degree of how definitive his statement was is silly to argue over - suffice to say it met the minimum threshold to use the term.
Now you claim to have "misread" the pumo's statement and then further claim that my alleged 'harping' on this is to score some lame 'victory' over you. I've no need for what at this point would be a pyrrhic victory at best, residual sub-thread wasteland smegma, an existential diagonal that has no real winner - but I do believe in the truth above all else, as I've said. And the truth is, this is the same pumo you said "identified" me as a Jewish Supremacist and laid out the terms of which you judged to be sufficient to qualify one as a Jewish Supremacist. You then casually mention how everyone "agrees" with you or "disagrees" with me with the vanity of a middle school mean girl, as if again it is in any way relevant to the central question stated clearly in the thread title. You then had to walk that back into a "misreading", when as I have laid out, the intent and color of the statement provided an obvious answer to the question. Same as when a politicians claims they "misspoke" - convenient, if intellectually lazy.
Finally, and this is the most laughable part - you have just stated you believe I am a Jewish Supremacist but you AREN'T EVEN SURE WHAT ONE IS. I am not even sure where to go with this cum fart of a line of "reasoning". The fact is you have a "hunch" about me and you that is actually what colors YOUR entire viewpoint on how I THINK. And that is what bothers me - do not ever make an accusation about me if you yourself can't even define what it is you're calling me. But I will address the specific example you provided- If Trump was "right on everything", which I guess would mean every other P.O.V I have but disagreed with me on Israel, yes, I would still support him. In fact, I voted for Obama would did major damage with his Iran deal and was not a great friend to Israel. So all this could have been cleared up if you had simply asked me specific questions, rather than lobbing out baseless accusations where you call me something that you're not even sure how to characterize and then drag us into another super autistic but strangely entertaining XO purgatory.
All the best, and goodnight. |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 11:03 PM Author: transparent meetinghouse international law enforcement agency yeah obviously (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4229484&forum_id=2#37997111) |
|
Date: March 26th, 2019 11:04 PM Author: naked stimulating gas station it's hard to tell what anyone really "is" on here the sincerity gets lost in the comedy, the extreme schticks, the argumentation, & the rhetoric-for-fun it's safe to say we all elevate our own tribes above others, even if it isn't intentional |
|
Date: March 27th, 2019 8:42 AM Author: Flirting old irish cottage heaven Cr, but Jewish Supremacist? Lawman comes @ me with this loaded phrase and then can't even define the term. That's BS.
This place REALLY breaks peoples' brains. |
|
Date: March 27th, 2019 8:45 AM Author: Dashing bbw even if you were closeted it would be obvious you were a faggot becuz u seem to love to have lawman8 fuck ur ass hard everyday. LAWMAN8 VINDICATED AGAIN (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4229484&forum_id=2#37998309) |
|
Date: March 27th, 2019 10:45 AM Author: Free-loading Philosopher-king Potus threads like this make me think that lawman and upset jew are irl not flame homosexual gay lovers (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4229484&forum_id=2#37998716) |
|
Date: March 27th, 2019 10:46 AM Author: Flirting old irish cottage heaven I don't think we ever denied this. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4229484&forum_id=2#37998719) |
|
Date: March 27th, 2019 11:16 AM Author: Garnet frum whorehouse you're annoying as fuck, that's for sure (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4229484&forum_id=2#37998841) |