The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
why were the male boomers so anti men
Poast new message in this thread
Date: July 15th, 2019 6:31 PM Author: Fishy marvelous depressive yarmulke they obviously liked their own kids but were wholly committed to cutting down younger men by like 2007. even gen xers were more sympathetic and helpful in the workforce, etc. the boomers just always seemed to have some childish obsession with oogling younger women in the workforce and massaging chicks in pantsuits ala joe biden. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4303573&forum_id=2#38537075) |
Date: July 15th, 2019 6:32 PM Author: startling spectacular rigpig they didn't actively dislike young men, they just didn't give a fuck (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4303573&forum_id=2#38537077) |
 |
Date: July 15th, 2019 6:35 PM Author: Fishy marvelous depressive yarmulke this is a possibility. But they fucked over millennial men so badly its hard to take that theory seriously. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4303573&forum_id=2#38537093) |
|
Date: July 15th, 2019 6:59 PM Author: cordovan frozen laser beams native No he's wrong and your OP is right. Boomer guys were MAF about their lost youth to a degree that makes this gay chattweetblog look mentally healthy. They were ACHING to fuck girls that were young enough to be their daughters. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4303573&forum_id=2#38537193) |
|
Date: July 15th, 2019 8:31 PM Author: Fishy marvelous depressive yarmulke was it just marketing during that time period? America has had a mentally ill obsession with sex for a long time and none of it resonates with reality. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4303573&forum_id=2#38537739) |
|
Date: July 16th, 2019 7:55 AM Author: fluffy histrionic stage double fault cq
I need some scholarship here |
|
Date: July 15th, 2019 6:33 PM Author: Chrome forum cuckoldry I think they were developmentally stunted by the retardation in the 60s/70s and had extra fear that they would be outdone by the younger generation
Of course, a Christ center worldview, which many boomers felt entitled to abandon, embraces the younger generation as a source of inspiration and learning |
|
Date: July 15th, 2019 6:34 PM Author: Misunderstood Stead I really don't get it. Much of the anti-men and grrl-power stuff has been put in place by boomer men. I am wondering if boomers overall just had more girl spawn. Seems unlikely because, barring external factors, the ratio should be 50/50. But I wonder if something weird happened to this generation where they just overwhelmingly had more girls. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4303573&forum_id=2#38537089) |
|
Date: July 16th, 2019 12:15 AM Author: cordovan frozen laser beams native The whole point of rock and roll/the sixties was a celebration of the fact that dudes are hornballs. And while church and religion were designed to contain the horniness of dudes, the social change of the sixties was designed to undermine the church (blacks co-opting the language of Christianity, Jews and Catholics becoming “white,” Hugh Hefner has a TV show, “I wanna hold your hand” and “satisfaction,” space race/advent of commercial computing/advent of commercial air travel/Einstein/nuclear era = new era of worshipping science and technology). So the boomers entire identity was crafted around celebrating their sexual openness as liberation. They were like the straight people version of gays today who get married despite having no actual interest in maintaining a relationship that’s anything like a marriage yet they do it for the cause of gay rights.
|
|
Date: July 16th, 2019 12:32 AM Author: Glittery Mentally Impaired Hall I have had a long time to ponder this.
What boomers have done to the millennial men in the workforce is an atrocity borne of resentment envy and irrational hatred, they made a Faustian bargain with the diversity and liberal establishment.
They sold a younger generation of men out in a desperate attempt to hold onto power for a little longer. Most boomers are functionally obsolete in Law and Finance and many other industries I am sure - the fact that they are so obsolete, so utterly useless, such a vessel of squanderment for resources is something they are keenly aware of and thus their only aim is to protect their entrenched position.
Once you realize that boomers do not have a goal of making money in the workforce, a lot becomes clear. They are not trying to innovate or make progress or open up opportunities because they are content to siphon out of the ossified corporate structure they created. They are trying to provide themselves with a fief and need serfs to do their bidding.
I’ll come and post more on this when more comes to my head. |
|
Date: July 16th, 2019 7:31 AM Author: cordovan frozen laser beams native The clearest example of this mentality that I'm aware of is the entertainment industry's reaction to Napster. The boomers in the big 5 media conglomerates in the late 90s were faced with a disruptive technology that could completely re-order their industry and provide an avenue for content innovation that was seemingly infinite. Their reaction to this wasn't to try to compete and win to develop the best new products that could expand their share of the market and provide new and better options for creators and customers. It was to 1) sell out to another boomer in Silicon Valley and give him literally 1 out of every 3 dollars of every digital media file that was sold and hand him the opportunity to control the entire market with a truly SPS platform (iTunes), and 2) to form a conglomerated and jointly owned streaming service and make it as pointless and nonthreatening to the existing content outlets as possible, such that a start-up could come along 8-10 years later after floundering with DVDs by mail for a preposterously long time and drink their milkshake.
To me that's the archetypal reaction of boomers to digital innovation threats. They were more comfortable cowering and banding together to manage their own decline than they were trying to engage with the changes and performing the capitalist effort that would be necessary to win in the market and make the world richer as a result. Their fundamental logic is oligarchy and maximizing their control relative to competitive threats/maximizing their numbers advantage during their prime earning years. And that's a big reason why Tech developed as monopolies and duopolies to beat them at their own game. |
|
Date: July 16th, 2019 10:51 AM Author: Glittery Mentally Impaired Hall PREACH (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4303573&forum_id=2#38539911) |
|
Date: July 16th, 2019 7:38 AM Author: Slate institution Is squanderment a word? It should be, if it isn't. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4303573&forum_id=2#38539379) |
|
Date: July 16th, 2019 10:50 AM Author: Glittery Mentally Impaired Hall If it isn't I invented that word on dat NEO-SHAKESPEARE tip - he old school we new school. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4303573&forum_id=2#38539898) |
|
Date: July 16th, 2019 10:51 AM Author: chestnut boltzmann locale (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4303573&forum_id=2#38539902) |
|
Date: July 16th, 2019 7:39 AM Author: Exhilarant carmine heaven basically they sold out values for easy sex. they wanted to fuck sluts so they embraced a morality that allowed for that to happen easily, and basically gave lip service to the other feminist bullshit that the women brought along as these newly enlightened thinkers. everyone got older, male boomers are rich as fuck and just want to viva viagra and molest young girls, so they dont care about the beast thats been unleashed. boomer women are bitter and old and just have the feminist values to fall back on, and have indoctrinated a younger generation.
its really no different from the poasters here who can only think 'unghhhhhhhhh' whenever a barely passable cute girl does something horrible |
|
Date: July 16th, 2019 7:48 AM Author: cordovan frozen laser beams native I don't think that's an entirely fair critique of boomers in the moment of the 60s and 70s, but by the 80s and 90s they knew or should have known better. They invented "trust no one under 30 who is a conservative and no one over 30 who is a liberal." Yet when their time came to age gracefully they did everything they could to cling to their youth, and tried to crowd out the younger generations coming behind them and prolong their own displacement. They deserve to have their social security cut. I can't wait until we have the numbers to pass it. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4303573&forum_id=2#38539398) |
|
Date: July 16th, 2019 7:55 AM Author: comical magenta mexican (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4303573&forum_id=2#38539403) |
|
Date: July 16th, 2019 11:03 AM Author: Glittery Mentally Impaired Hall Also it was a great way for them to get back at their own Greatest Gen fathers. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4303573&forum_id=2#38539980) |