Race-crime nexus entirely explained by economics. Gender-crime nexus? LJL genes!
| razzmatazz snowy public bath | 08/19/19 | | Appetizing range | 08/19/19 | | razzmatazz snowy public bath | 08/19/19 | | Appetizing range | 08/19/19 | | razzmatazz snowy public bath | 08/19/19 | | Appetizing range | 08/19/19 | | Beady-eyed school associate | 08/19/19 | | Jet Immigrant | 08/19/19 | | Beady-eyed school associate | 08/19/19 | | Appetizing range | 08/19/19 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: August 19th, 2019 12:50 PM Author: razzmatazz snowy public bath
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4326333&forum_id=2#38709188)
|
|
Date: August 19th, 2019 1:00 PM Author: Appetizing range
"Id vote for the shitlib that got on the cartoon train demanding that prisons should be defunded until they are 51% female"
Of course not. But that doesn't have anything to do with your original point. The media incessantly harps about how boys would be docile and compliant if not for society:
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/21/opinion/boys-violence-shootings-guns.html
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4326333&forum_id=2#38709284) |
|
Date: August 19th, 2019 1:01 PM Author: Beady-eyed school associate
I think his general point is that any argument for black over-representation can be used interchangeable with male over-representation but that you never see shitlibs do this.
So if you believe in biology and genetics, then your going to argue that both are over-represented partially on this basis (e.g. IQ, impulse control, T-levels, etc). An sane, non-shitlibs, do this and are consistent.
If you believe in culture, then you will address both in the same way as well (e.g. toxic masculinity, toxic inner city black culture). Yet liberals never do this. Look at the backlash against Trump's Baltimore comment
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4326333&forum_id=2#38709303) |
|
|