lol

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dHMsWdRlGwo#t=19m50s

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4580939&forum_id=2,#40581063)

The woke left is a growing problem though.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4580939&forum_id=2,#40581077)

Remember that XO Ted explained Pinker’s OP 30 years ago:

Leftism is not a religion in the strict sense because leftist doctrine does not postulate the existence of any supernatural being. But, for the leftist, leftism plays a psychological role much like that which religion plays for some people. The leftist NEEDS to believe in leftism; it plays a vital role in his psychological economy. His beliefs are not easily modified by logic or facts. He has a deep conviction that leftism is morally Right with a capital R, and that he has not only a right but a duty to impose leftist morality on everyone.

223. Some readers may say, "This stuff about leftism is a lot of crap. I know John and Jane who are leftish types and they don't have all these totalitarian tendencies." It's quite true that many leftists, possibly even a numerical majority, are decent people who sincerely believe in tolerating others' values (up to a point) and wouldn't want to use high-handed methods to reach their social goals. Our remarks about leftism are not meant to apply to every individual leftist but to describe the general character of leftism as a movement. And the general character of a movement is not necessarily determined by the numerical proportions of the various kinds of people involved in the movement.

224. The people who rise to positions of power in leftist movements tend to be leftists of the most power- hungry type, because power-hungry people are those who strive hardest to get into positions of power. Once the power-hungry types have captured control of the movement, there are many leftists of a gentler breed who inwardly disapprove of many of the actions of the leaders, but cannot bring themselves to oppose them. They NEED their faith in the movement, and because they cannot give up this faith they go along with the leaders. True, SOME leftists do have the guts to oppose the totalitarian tendencies that emerge, but they generally lose, because the power-hungry types are better organized, are more ruthless and Machiavellian and have taken care to build themselves a strong power base.

226. Thus the fact that many individual leftists are personally mild and fairly tolerant people by no means prevents leftism as a whole form having a totalitarian tendency.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4580939&forum_id=2,#40581150)

I've had 4-5 people read parts of it in light of current happenings and they are legit blown away (no pun intended).

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4580939&forum_id=2,#40581182)

Trumpism is not a totalitarian ideology. It isn’t any ideology at all and isn’t even coherent. By contrast, XO Ted’s quote is applicable to Islam, for instance

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4580939&forum_id=2,#40581214)

https://www.270towin.com/historical_maps/1984_large.png

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4580939&forum_id=2,#40581244)

>> It's quite true that many leftists, possibly even a numerical majority, are decent people who sincerely believe in tolerating others' values (up to a point) and wouldn't want to use high-handed methods to reach their social goals. Our remarks about leftism are not meant to apply to every individual leftist but to describe the general character of leftism as a movement. And the general character of a movement is not necessarily determined by the numerical proportions of the various kinds of people involved in the movement. <<

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4580939&forum_id=2,#40581254)

230. The more dangerous leftists, that is, those who are most power-hungry, are often characterized by arrogance or by a dogmatic approach to ideology. However,the most dangerous leftists of all may be certain oversocia-lized types who avoid irritating displays of aggressiveness and refrain from advertising their leftism, but work quietly and unobtrusively to promote collectivist values, “enlightened” psychological techniques for socializing children,dependence of the individual on the system, and so forth.These crypto-leftists (as we may call them) approximate certain bourgeois types as far as practical action is concerned, but differ from them in psychology, ideology and motivation. The ordinary bourgeois tries to bring people under control of the system in order to protect his way of life,or he does so simply because his attitudes are conventional. The crypto-leftist tries to bring people under control of the system because he is a True Believer in a collectivistic ideology. The crypto-leftist is differentiated from the average leftist of the oversocialized type by the fact that his rebellious impulse is weaker and he is more securely socialized. He is differentiated from the ordinary well-socialized bourgeois by the fact that there is some deep lack within him that makes it necessary for him to devote himself to a cause and immerse himself in a collectivity. And maybe his (well-sublimated) drive for power is stronger than that of the average bourgeois.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4580939&forum_id=2,#40581281)

70% of white people, including tens of millions of 'leftists', voted for Reagan and Nixon, under circumstances in which an existential threat to the white race did not exist.

there is every reason to believe that an even higher % would vote as a bloc as a matter of actual physical survival.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4580939&forum_id=2,#40581399)

but there is a greater chance of the woke left firing me than Trump sending me to a camp.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4580939&forum_id=2,#40581274)