The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Dumb Q about section 230 protections
| White Toaster | 10/28/20 |
| galvanic stag film | 10/28/20 |
| Lime excitant gas station | 10/28/20 |
| White Toaster | 10/28/20 |
| Big Disgusting Step-uncle's House Mood | 10/28/20 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: October 28th, 2020 11:56 AM Author: White Toaster (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4664459&forum_id=2#41205131) |
 |
Date: October 28th, 2020 12:03 PM Author: galvanic stag film Obviously it depends on how they revise it, but probably. Removing Section 230 completely would be a bad idea. Clarifying that it doesn't protect you if you exert editorial control makes more sense. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4664459&forum_id=2#41205181) |
Date: October 28th, 2020 12:07 PM Author: Lime excitant gas station There are no dumb questions on xo (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4664459&forum_id=2#41205210) |
|
Date: October 28th, 2020 9:46 PM Author: White Toaster (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4664459&forum_id=2#41209415) |
|
Date: October 28th, 2020 9:49 PM Author: Big Disgusting Step-uncle's House Mood Yes
Repealing section 230 entirely would be really bad and dumb. “We” need to go after the big tech platforms specifically and make them guarantee people the right to use their service, similar to utilities |