\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

I believe there was no fraud in the 2020 US election.

I believe there was no fraud in the 2020 US election. You mi...
.,,.,.,,.,.,,,...,,.,,,.,..,.,...,.,.
  01/13/21
...
.,,.,.,,.,.,,,...,,.,,,.,..,.,...,.,.
  01/13/21
...
Richard, from England
  01/13/21
...
dont run
  01/13/21
...
;.;.;...;.;;....;.;.;;;...;.;..;..;.
  01/13/21
...
.,,.,.,,.,.,,,...,,.,,,.,..,.,...,.,.
  01/13/21
Captain Barf's name does him no favors
Skinny Joey
  01/13/21
He has serious views to share with the world
..;...;..;..;;..;.;.;.;.;.;..
  01/13/21
...
.,,.,.,,.,.,,,...,,.,,,.,..,.,...,.,.
  01/17/21


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: January 13th, 2021 12:04 PM
Author: .,,.,.,,.,.,,,...,,.,,,.,..,.,...,.,.


I believe there was no fraud in the 2020 US election. You might wonder how I deal with evidence such as statistical anomalies in mail-in votes, sworn affidavits about trucks full of unmarked ballots appearing in the middle of the night, random samples in AZ showing irregularities larger than the margin of victory, and the discovery of a voting machine that switched votes in Michigan. Well, the answer is simple. Silicon Valley tech companies have informed me I will be punished if I believe there was fraud. Would a corporation make me believe something that isn't true?

There are a number of other things I believe now, so let's just clear the air.

The only thing that makes someone a "woman" is that she's decided she wants the word to apply to her. The word otherwise has no meaning. No matter what chromosomes or physiology you have, no matter what clothes you wear, no matter what your hobbies or interests, if you say you're a woman, you're a woman. Because that's all a woman is. A woman is defined as "a person who wants to call themselves a 'woman.'" Like the former proposition, I know this is true because I will be punished for believing otherwise. I should also note that I believe grammar is always descriptive, not prescriptive, and prescriptivism in grammar is racist and classist (meaning I will likely be punished for believing in it). So I guess that means I believe the word "woman" means that because that's how we've always commonly used it, e.g., when Kipling calls Gunga Din a "man," what he means is that he's "a person who wants to be called a 'man.'" I will henceforth refer to a member of the gestating half of the species as a "womb-having-humans," or "wo'man" for short. The other half of the species shall be referred to as "oppressors."

I believe that there are no meaningful behavioral differences between wo'men and oppressors. On one hand, I believe that wo'men have regular periods, and that these periods cause them enough distress to be entitled to take time off work. One the other hand, I also believe that sex-linked hormones have zero affect on what a person achieves and pursues with their work. Wo'men cannot be expected to behave in the same competitive, aggressive way that men do at work is because they are different than us. The reason wo'men do not achieve the same things men do in the competitive, aggressive system of capitalism is they are not different than us; they are merely victims of discrimination. Do these things seem contradictory? If they seem contradictory to you, well, I'll report you to human resources. They don't contradict at all, and the proof is simple: if you believe otherwise, you'll be punished. The fact is, sex hormones have no meaningful neurological or behavioral effects, as has been proven by decades of laboriously singling out and punishing anyone who says otherwise.

Along these lines, there is no such thing as a man with a crossdressing fetish whose life eventually gets consumed by his fetish, who seeks access to wo'men's dressing rooms, bathrooms, and other private spaces in order to get a sexual thrill. Such a person does not exist. Anybody who wants to go into the wo'men's bathroom while wearing a dress is a woman. Full stop. If you disagree, science has proven you wrong by severely punishing anybody who questions the truth.

I believe that, unlike other mammalian species, sub-populations of the human species that have lived and developed separately for eons have zero differences other than surface-level appearance. I might be allowed to believe that people with dark skin are more prone to vitamin D deficiency in northern climates than people with light skin, but I need to check with Twitter mods on that. Beyond skin color, any observed differences are due to racism. For example, it is well-known that different sub-groups of humans perform differently on a simple pattern-matching test because pattern-matching is a racist concept. However, there is no reason to expect that people who don't do well on pattern-matching wouldn't do well at C++ programming. This has been proved via the scientific process of punishing people who say otherwise.

I believe that marriage and having children constrains wo'men, and that they are happier and more fulfilled when they don't get married, don't have children, have sex with random people they meet online, and devote their lives to generating profits for corporations. The reason wo'men have historically unprecedented levels of depression, mental health issues, and alcohol-related deaths is that they are being oppressed by sexist oppressors and don't get government funding for therapy. I know I will be punished for saying otherwise, and would an idea bring down swift retribution if it was true?

I believe that American businesses want to exploit slave labor in the Third World, use H1bs to bring in cheap labor that they can compel to work 80-hr weeks on threat of deportation, lobby the State Dept to bring in refugees from all over the world to hire at minimum wage, and purchase actual slaves from actual human traffickers from Mexico because they are fighting racism. Every time an Indian H1b software developer is forced to work a weekend while the whites go home, America gets a little less racist. If you question in any way whether or not this might be harmful for society in any way, or whether perhaps companies protected and sustained by an American legal system, built on the votes, dollars, and culture of Americans, should have some obligation to prioritize hiring Americans, you're a vile racist who is no different from Hitler. The logic is simple: you'll be punished for disagreeing. That makes it true.

The police are systematically hunting down and killing black men. The only reason a black-bodied person of color has ever been shot by a policeman is a racist system that unjustifiably makes police feel they are licensed to treat black people the way the English treated the great auk. White people are never shot by the police, and when they are shot by the police, they deserve it. I know for a fact that there is no evidence that black people commit any particular crime at higher rates than white people, because presenting any evidence can get you punished. The only reason black people get arrested more often is racism.

Remember, the first step in solving a puzzle is to ask, "What do the authorities say? What do I have permission to think?" Empirical methods are downstream of authoritative proclamations, and I know this because I don't want to get in trouble for thinking otherwise.

https://lexic.co/barfblog/i-believe

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4738400&forum_id=2#41744986)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 13th, 2021 12:10 PM
Author: .,,.,.,,.,.,,,...,,.,,,.,..,.,...,.,.




(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4738400&forum_id=2#41745037)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 13th, 2021 12:11 PM
Author: Richard, from England



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4738400&forum_id=2#41745049)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 13th, 2021 12:15 PM
Author: dont run



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4738400&forum_id=2#41745074)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 13th, 2021 12:25 PM
Author: ;.;.;...;.;;....;.;.;;;...;.;..;..;.




(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4738400&forum_id=2#41745148)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 13th, 2021 2:28 PM
Author: .,,.,.,,.,.,,,...,,.,,,.,..,.,...,.,.




(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4738400&forum_id=2#41746150)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 13th, 2021 2:34 PM
Author: Skinny Joey

Captain Barf's name does him no favors

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4738400&forum_id=2#41746205)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 13th, 2021 2:37 PM
Author: ..;...;..;..;;..;.;.;.;.;.;..


He has serious views to share with the world

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4738400&forum_id=2#41746222)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 17th, 2021 7:59 PM
Author: .,,.,.,,.,.,,,...,,.,,,.,..,.,...,.,.




(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4738400&forum_id=2#41772168)