The media is announcing that they are finding these people by looking at soldier's "social media presence", but this is not accurate. What they are doing is using the weaponized NSA search database queries to search every soldier, which comes up with *all electronic communications* -- email, phone calls, texts, history of movement (tracked via the phone), social media, google searches, everything.

The rank and file military, and some police departments, are the last bastions of white Christian Americans in any institutions in America.

Once the rank and file military are purged, we are going to see, very quickly, the following:

- Laws will be practiced criminalizing "white supremacy". The definition of this is nebulous and will be expanded and come to mean anything that isn't officially sanctioned by the establishment.

- The NSA search database queries will be utilized first to purge any right leaning people in positions of power -- politics, business, socially, anything. These people will be cut off not just from their jobs, but also from the banking industry, freedom of movement, internet, utilities, everything. They will have nowhere to go.

- After that they will use this against regular whites and regular Christians.

- They will set up slave labor camps / indoctrination camps / sterilization camps or just camps to genocide you for anyone who resists. The media will be fully compliant and label any deviant an evil "white supremicist."

- Later on, they will turn this power against anyone insufficiently leftist. That includes *all leftists on XO* other than benzo, who, to his credit, embodies exactly the type of person that the government wants to be alive: destitute, on drugs, a felon, and with no prospects.

People like Upset Jew will cheer on as people to the right of him are purged; even when he is eventually caught up in the dragnet and thrown into prison to be murdered and his assets confiscated, he will live in a cloud of confusion about how exactly he ended up in this situation.

Even people like LathamTouchedMe will be caught up in it, both for posting on XO and also for holding racist views against blacks. Sorry LTM, you're going to be on one of the later trains.

This is all going to happen very quickly now, none of this is far off.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4743746&forum_id=2#41786687)

Please think of this thread when you are in your holding cell.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4743746&forum_id=2#41787430)

And the craziest part is that even after all of the white Christians with literal arsenals and ammo stockpiles who have been hitting the range weekly for years fantasizing about shooting niggers in the head are laid off and blackballed and can’t get bank accounts and have lost their homes and savings, almost none of the tens of millions of angry and paranoid and dispossessed and demonized people who will fit that description will even attempt to fight back. Instead, they’ll all just meekly hand over their guns to the shitlib armies filled with sheboons with their scopes mounted on backwards and fat white women puffing along and the skinny giggling fags covertly checking their hair in the iPhone, take a knee to briefly honor George Floyd, and—with tears glistening in their eyes—quietly usher their wives and kids into the filthy cattle cars as they head off to certain death. Because they will know that their time has come and gone.

It’s crazy, but it’s true.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4743746&forum_id=2#41788552)

I know it blows my mind too but it’s undeniable

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4743746&forum_id=2#41788558)

Lots of suicides and drug overdoses though.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4743746&forum_id=2#41788588)

Almost as if the real hard far right elements in this country who have arsenals and bunkers and militia memberships and police / armed forces experience (not the fat LARPer retards who “stormed the Capitol!!!”) don’t protest, don’t riot, don’t really make themselves known and visible like the far left. They just bunker down and stock up and hit the range to practice and buy more guns and more prep supplies and more body armor and get angrier and more paranoid and crazier. Until eventually, they go from zero to sixty suddenly and with no warning and explode.

Almost like that.

But I’m not one of those guys, to be very clear. I’m just speculating here, I personally disavow all political violence in all forms and I would never engage in it.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4743746&forum_id=2#41788616)

Buddy, your level of delusion is a sight to see.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4743746&forum_id=2#41788632)

Things are still pretty good, actually. Doom and gloom aside, stock market is reaching new highs for people with 401ks, free porn and cheap liquor and weed are all over the place, cheap streamed movies and plenty of fast food. Sure, life has slowly become shittier and shittier over the last 30 years in many small ways and the rot is extremely visible at the macro levels, but nothing absolutely crazy on the micro level in most areas. Even “poor” people still have flat screen TVs and new sneakers and no one is actually starving to death in the gutters. Almost no one in the prole classes really gives a shit what academics and faggots on MSNBC and political eggheads are saying about the “evils of white supremacy.”

But that equation changes very quickly if your OP comes to pass. You really think the government will systematically dispossess tens of millions of white Christian goys—literally lock them outside of society, no jobs, no bank accounts, not allowed to use social media, “we’re coming for your family”—and that won’t change the reaction real fast?

And I’m the delusional one. Lol, keep betting on the wheezing homosexual Jews and their A-Team of grievance nigs, faggy soyboys, obese sheroes, and eggheaded bespectacled intellectuals. No way those invincible supervillains could ever lose if things really heated up, and no way tens of millions of angry paranoid heavily armed rednecks who sexually fantasize about playing Boston Tea Party would ever dare to push back violently and bring their fantasies into reality if they started getting fucked with too hard.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4743746&forum_id=2#41788656)

401k? How is that responsive at all to this?

https://www.cnbc.com/2015/10/06/nearly-half-of-americans-have-no-savings-survey.html

"Lol, keep betting on the wheezing homosexual Jews and their A-Team of grievance nigs, faggy soyboys, obese sheroes and egghead intellectuals."

Shitlibs have been winning all modern internal battles for the last couple hundred years at least. I know you want to see Jews get their comeuppance and I'm sure it will come, but I think it will happen not in the way you want, i.e. some mythical white rebellion, but when Jews import so many Muslims, Indians and other brown & blacks that these groups (who Jews think they can easily control) turn on them like Frankenstein's creature turned on its master. But that will happen long after these purges happen imo.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4743746&forum_id=2#41788680)

“Shitlibs have been winning all modern internal battles for the last couple hundred years”

Imagine actually believing this. “Zomg USSR! Venezuela!” The historical ignorance is stunning.

But again, let’s be clear that my post is a direct response to your stated thesis in the OP where not only does the left turn ultra authoritarian very quickly, they go balls to the wall with it in the near future—full dispossesion of normie white Christians, literal internment / death camps, etc. Pointing to the relative restraint the Right has shown up until now (which is already changing in case you can’t feel it) and extrapolating any similar level of passivity in the wake of those predicted actions isn’t just misguided, it’s retardedly delusional. There’s really nothing else to say. I guess enjoy the doomer fantasy if it gets you off. The left could indeed conceivably win with a slow boil, but the temperature is rising quickly these days, and your OP is specifically predicated on libs quickly blasting the heat way up from here out. That’s a totally different scenario for many reasons.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4743746&forum_id=2#41788695)

We will see who is right soon enough, I guess.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4743746&forum_id=2#41788703)

And my point is that while the radical left loves to take to the streets and “show force” through dumbass meaningless protests and mindless rioting and burning a local police station or two, the white right remains hidden and passive and appears endlessly weak... until, suddenly, it’s not, at all. Like how some men make a big show of being “tough guys” by loudly beating their wives all the time but never really hurt her too much, while others silently endure decades of henpecking and abuse and look like weak cucks until one fateful night when they finally blow their top and viciously and systematically murder-suicide the whole family plus the dog and the goldfish in a single 10 minute outburst and no one can even process the carnage.

I agree with your last sentence, at least.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4743746&forum_id=2#41788713)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4743746&forum_id=2#41786692)

it was never about 'defunding' the police (or military); it was about 'de-whitening' the police.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4743746&forum_id=2#41786763)

Seattle City Council Member Suggests Firing White Officers In Massive Reduction Of Police Department

Lisa_Herbold_Portrait

Seattle City Council photo

The Seattle City Council is facing something of a dilemma in its popular pledge to cut the police budget by 50 percent. To do so would require firing a significant number of police officers, which is also popular. The problem is that the firing would be done by seniority and many of the less senior officers are black. The solution according to City Council member Lisa Herbold is simple: fire officers based on their race. While that would be the definition of racial discrimination, Herbold clearly believes that it is discrimination for a good cause. The federal courts are likely to disagree. Most notably, Herbold’s call for racial discrimination against white officers would seek to undue the work of Justice Thurgood Marshall who insisted that racial discrimination unlawful and evil regardless of the race you want to disenfranchise or discriminate against.

Seattle Police Chief Carmen Best released a video calling the plan of Herbold and others “completely reckless.” She also sent a letter to Mayor Jenny Durkan warning that dramatic cuts would require the layoff of hundreds of officers. The Police Department also warned that the firings would include many minority officers.

It was only the last risk that concerned Herbold who promptly suggested discriminating on the basis of race:

Herbold insists that this would be perfectly legal despite the prohibitions under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

What concerns me most is not that such calls for racial discrimination are possibly constitutional but that they are so clearly popular.

The EEOC amplifies this point on its website: “It is unlawful to discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race or color in regard to hiring, termination, promotion, compensation, job training, or any other term, condition, or privilege of employment.”

In taking this position, Herbold is opposing one of the best known opinions by Thurgood Marshall. In McDonald v. Santa Fe Trail Transportation Co. (1976), Justice Thurgood Marshall wrote opinions that called for the broad interpretation of Title VII to protect everyone. In McDonald, two white employees were fired after a theft in the business. The two white employees were held jointly and severally liable with a black employee. However, only the white employees were fired. After they sued under Title VII, Marshall wrote for the majority in denouncing such discrimination against white employees, insisted that “racial discrimination in private employment against whites [must be] on the same terms as racial discrimination against nonwhites.” He denounced “the illogic in retaining guilty employees of one color while discharging those of another color.” While Marshall would vigorously support affirmative action (including his dissent in Bakke), he believed that all races were protected from discrimination under federal law.

This of course would be even more egregious since Herbold wants to fire white officers due to their race alone. They would not be accused of any wrongdoing or failure. The problem is their race.

It is notable that is not an action that is part of or in furtherance of a valid affirmative action plans ordered by a court or approved by a federal agency. See United Steelworkers of America v. Weber (1979) and Johnson v. Transportation Agency (1987). In Ricci v. DeStefano (2009), the Supreme Court ruled against the city of New Haven after a group of white firefighters and a hispanic firefighter challenged the refusal to certify the results of promotion exams in order to promote black firefighters who performed less well. The Court held that the City’s refusal to certify the test was unlawful discrimination under Title VII. If found that “race-based action like the City’s in this case is impermissible under Title VII unless the employer can demonstrate a strong basis in evidence that, had it not taken the action, it would have been liable under the disparate-impact statute.”

Herbold would not only refuse to promote on the basis of race but would fire officers on that basis. No test. Just a pure racially discriminatory program of terminations. Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1 (2007), Chief Justice John Roberts once declared “The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race.” That is clearly not the plan of Herbold and any of her colleagues who want to fire officers based on their race.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4743746&forum_id=2#41786801)

They psychologically cannot handle the truth

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4743746&forum_id=2#41786878)

Anyone who really accepts this would leave the country now before it's too late.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4743746&forum_id=2#41786879)

you can try to explain this to people but they never listen

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4743746&forum_id=2#41793397)

And how do you know this?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4743746&forum_id=2#41786894)

You can read the Collyer report yourself here:

https://www.scribd.com/document/349261099/2016-Cert-FISC-Memo-Opin-Order-Apr-2017-4#download&from_embed

The issues identified in the report have never been corrected. It originated from the DOJ national security division (NSD), which the only division to have literally no OIG oversight at all.

I'm positive that the abuse has spread like a cancer because it's never been checked.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4743746&forum_id=2#41786952)

(Guy who thinks Mitch “Cocaine” McConnell represents Bubba from the trailer park and all of the former Seal Team Six veterans out there)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4743746&forum_id=2#41788574)

http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=4639172&mc=71&forum_id=2

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4743746&forum_id=2#41787082)

because of all things known

that is most difficult.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4743746&forum_id=2#41787299)

“ if you move a bunch of Califags to rural northern Idaho it'll make Idaho blue”

This is exactly what happens, liberals are a cancer and they spread their liberalism to the states and areas they flee to.

“ the United States military just got its shit pushed in by Afghanistan after a 17-year war”

This is entirely due to restrictive rules of engagement. Shitlibs want America to bleed power and influence. They have the opposite of restrictive rules of engagements against conservative Christian whites.

Your third paragraph is gibberish.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4743746&forum_id=2#41787887)