The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
The 2016 Russia election freak-out makes perfect sense if you believe Tucker
| https://i.imgur.com/ovcBe0z.png | 01/13/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: January 13th, 2026 7:16 PM Author: https://i.imgur.com/ovcBe0z.png was in the CIA. That's because when Obama released his report on Russian interference in 2016, AFTER Trump had won the election but before the inauguration, it was nothing but screenshots of RT and Tucker. In each case the charge was the same: Story X was reported by RT on [Date], Story X was then amplified by Tucker on Fox News on [subsequent Date]. There were about a dozen examples provided, and these constituted the entirety of the evidence presented by The Government.
At the time, cons mocked the shit out of this. They said "look how flimsy their evidence is." But what if they were really saying "a CIA dood is amplifying Russian state media?" Don't we all agree now that Tucker was with the CIA back then? |