The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Hubble tension now a 7-sigma discovery (cosmology 100% broken)
| The Penis | 05/21/26 |
| Fucking Fuckface | 05/21/26 |
| icanseemyneurons | 05/21/26 |
| xXxPARSIGOD420xXx | 05/21/26 |
| Wilbur Mercer, permanently embarrassed millionaire | 05/21/26 |
| icanseemyneurons | 05/21/26 |
| cucumbers | 05/21/26 |
| Kenneth Play | 05/21/26 |
| (NSFW) | 05/21/26 |
| xXxPARSIGOD420xXx | 05/21/26 |
| (NSFW) | 05/21/26 |
| UhOh | 05/21/26 |
| cucumbers | 05/21/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: May 21st, 2026 7:47 AM Author: The Penis Meaning it's 100% real and the Standard Model of cosmology is 100% broken especially when you put it into perspective with all of the other shit that's wrong with it (bulk flow anomaly, lithium problem, JWST "impossible galaxies and many other things). If redshift is broken we have no idea how to measure "distance" or "time". And also the entire data pipeline is likely infected with the rot. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5867867&forum_id=2#49892739) |
Date: May 21st, 2026 8:22 AM Author: Fucking Fuckface At a fancy cocktail party, Julia begins talking about all of the Habibi tension in cosmetology, her eyes widening for dramatic effect as she leans in to whisper about the seven Cigna events
|
 |
Date: May 21st, 2026 8:56 AM Author: icanseemyneurons (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5867867&forum_id=2#49892813) |
|
Date: May 21st, 2026 9:29 AM Author: xXxPARSIGOD420xXx (🧐) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5867867&forum_id=2#49892848) |
|
Date: May 21st, 2026 8:32 AM Author: Wilbur Mercer, permanently embarrassed millionaire (Safari) A lot of "cosmologists" are reddit atheists flailing in the face of biblical creationism. Zero surprise here (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5867867&forum_id=2#49892779) |
|
Date: May 21st, 2026 8:56 AM Author: icanseemyneurons Who cares also no shit also who cares (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5867867&forum_id=2#49892814) |
|
Date: May 21st, 2026 9:02 AM Author: cucumbers Cosmology never worked. Mostly flame and a very weak field of "science" that's almost always wrong on any core "principle" in the field. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5867867&forum_id=2#49892820) |
|
Date: May 21st, 2026 9:32 AM Author: Kenneth Play (emotional girth) i don't understand the significance of this and need it explained at the level of a precocious middle school student (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5867867&forum_id=2#49892851) |
|
Date: May 21st, 2026 9:39 AM Author: (NSFW) everything about the universe is made up by i<3science PhDs who need to justify their existence and paychek. So they make up some shit about whatever, do a couple experients in their 40 million dollar lab with flashlights and vacuums, and declare themselves (mostly, almost entirely, but not 100%) correct. Then there's an award ceremony and cocktails in Geneva or Paris and this is where Epstein comes in. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5867867&forum_id=2#49892857) |
|
Date: May 21st, 2026 9:40 AM Author: xXxPARSIGOD420xXx (🧐) cr they should have been LAW SCHOLARS (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5867867&forum_id=2#49892860) |
|
Date: May 21st, 2026 9:43 AM Author: (NSFW) Law dont lie (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5867867&forum_id=2#49892862) |
|
Date: May 21st, 2026 10:10 AM Author: UhOh tbf, isn't this literally the scientific process at work? the same way we eventually understood everything else. no one gets it right the first, or even second or third time. people believe in things for decades until someone comes along and proves them wrong. i agree with you that there's a lulzy arrogance among these people that i'm happy to see get slapped around a little bit, but it's good to see the process is working. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5867867&forum_id=2#49892904) |
|
Date: May 21st, 2026 10:00 AM Author: cucumbers There's a large, unexplained, and statistically significant difference between measuring how quickly the universe is expanding using two different techniques.
At first, these two different measurement techniques had a lot of overlap in their results, but as they've gotten more precise over the years, the difference became too large to explain as just an insignificant statistical blip.
This is important only if you take cosmology seriously, which you shouldn't, because it's a shitty, flimsy, and weak field of "science." |