What is James Comey thinking right now?
| Arousing national cuck | 11/09/16 | | 180 federal gas station | 11/09/16 | | Cracking Garrison | 11/24/25 | | Cracking Garrison | 11/24/25 | | Cracking Garrison | 11/24/25 | | Cracking Garrison | 11/24/25 | | Cracking Garrison | 11/26/25 | | Bright judgmental meetinghouse | 11/26/25 | | Cracking Garrison | 11/26/25 | | Cracking Garrison | 11/27/25 | | Cracking Garrison | 11/27/25 | | nyuug | 12/01/25 | | nyuug | 12/02/25 | | nyuug | 12/03/25 | | nyuug | 12/04/25 | | nyuug | 12/05/25 | | Wine Parlor | 11/24/25 | | pearly roommate | 11/26/25 | | provocative fuchsia dilemma internal respiration | 11/27/25 | | razzle den windowlicker | 11/24/25 | | Bright judgmental meetinghouse | 11/26/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
 |
Date: November 27th, 2025 10:35 PM Author: provocative fuchsia dilemma internal respiration
No. The Judge addressed this in the order of dismissal:
Generally, “[t]he return of an indictment tolls the statute of limitations on the charges contained in the indictment.” United States v. Ojedokun, 16 F.4th 1091, 1109 (4th Cir. 2021). “An invalid indictment,” however, “cannot serve to block the door of limitations as it swings closed.” United States v. Crysopt Corp., 781 F. Supp. 375, 378 (D. Md. 1991) (emphasis in original); see also United States v. Gillespie, 666 F. Supp. 1137, 1141 (N.D. Ill. 1987) (“[A] valid indictment insulates from statute-of-limitations problems any refiling of the same charges during the pendency of that valid indictment (that is, the superseding of a valid indictment). But if the earlier indictment is void, there is no legitimate peg on which to hang such a judicial limitations-tolling result.” (emphasis in original)).
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3419727&forum_id=2#49466883) |
|
|