Deploying autism to understand Roman Catholic canon law and practices
| Drunkard | 04/25/25 | | metaphysics is fallow | 04/25/25 | | Drunkard | 04/26/25 | | ,..,,......,....,,,,..,.,... | 04/26/25 | | gedood persoon | 04/26/25 | | ,..,,......,....,,,,..,.,... | 04/26/25 | | gedood persoon | 04/26/25 | | ,..,,......,....,,,,..,.,... | 04/26/25 | | Drunkard | 04/26/25 | | gedood persoon | 04/26/25 | | Drunkard | 04/26/25 | | gedood persoon | 04/26/25 | | Drunkard | 04/26/25 | | gedood persoon | 04/26/25 | | Drunkard | 04/26/25 | | gedood persoon | 04/26/25 | | Drunkard | 04/26/25 | | gedood persoon | 04/26/25 | | metaphysics is fallow | 04/26/25 | | ,..,,......,....,,,,..,.,... | 04/26/25 | | Drunkard | 04/26/25 | | ,..,,......,....,,,,..,.,... | 04/26/25 | | Drunkard | 04/26/25 | | ,..,,......,....,,,,..,.,... | 04/26/25 | | Drunkard | 04/26/25 | | Drunkard | 04/26/25 | | gedood persoon | 04/26/25 | | Drunkard | 04/26/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: April 25th, 2025 3:23 AM Author: Drunkard
Taking questions and, most particularly, welcoming comments and analysis from any of my Brothers and Sisters in Christ.
My initial observation are: (1) that it makes sense that many lawyers are Roman Catholic (and obviously jews too) because to slog through figuring this out is much more complicated than reformed theology; (2) the average Roman Catholic has limited knowledge of the Bible, but tends to know the the rules in detail, even if they do not know them as canon law or part of the catechism per se; (3) Roman Catholics, and of course it varies, tend to be more serious about their faith insofar as that they actually believe than non-evangelical Protestants (I can’t say I know enough Eastern Orthodox to compare and non-denominations are a broader range), but don’t tend to follow the rules as much as reformed; (4) you can read the relevant parts of canon law fairly quickly (for example, I skipped those on ordination and schools), but getting through the catechism is daunting, especially if you are looking at the citations with any frequency, even just the citations to the canon law and Bible; (5) I am not sure how anyone short of a super study monk could read all of the early church fathers and the various changes throughout the centuries or even to keep up with the changes to Roman Catholic practices, just going through Vatican I and II sources takes days to get a superficial understanding.
Yours in Christ
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5715889&forum_id=2#48879107) |
 |
Date: April 26th, 2025 1:31 AM Author: Drunkard
I agree my Brother in Christ.
Faith begets works. There is very little difference between Roman Catholics and Reformed on this. Even the most conservative Roman Catholics will admit it’s faith alone.
I don’t have the wisdom to understand the division caused by the Filioque, but that orthodox are entitled to RC communion, but Protestants are not, tells me the catholic Church is not so catholic. I pray that the universal church becomes so again.
On papal infallibility, I spent hours on this, and as far as I can tell, post Vatican I the only ex catherdra statement that is subject to papal infallibility is the bodily assumption of the Mother of God Mary in 1950.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5715889&forum_id=2#48881996) |
 |
Date: April 26th, 2025 1:49 AM
Author: ,..,,......,....,,,,..,.,...
You have some ways to go on papal infallibility brother if you really want to understand it. Its not that simple since the charism of infallibility protects the church even when it teaches non-definitively. Donum veritatis is a good start.
The key to justification for Catholics is innee renewal/divinization and what opens the path to a rich spiritual theology.
Filioque is insanely complicated if you really want to dig in (you'll need to learn Greek). I don't really care about it much since I think EOs will end up having to become RC out of necessity
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5715889&forum_id=2#48882018) |
 |
Date: April 26th, 2025 1:51 AM
Author: ,..,,......,....,,,,..,.,...
Ljl are u an orthobro? Did they have a demographic crisis in those centuries? That's what I'm referring to
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5715889&forum_id=2#48882025) |
 |
Date: April 26th, 2025 1:56 AM
Author: ,..,,......,....,,,,..,.,...
Fair enough but i think being threatened by an external enemy tends to strength a community's religious and ethnic bonds as part of a defense mechanism. There's no Muslims invading Orthodox countries today, it's just apathy causing the collapse
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5715889&forum_id=2#48882041) |
Date: April 26th, 2025 1:38 AM
Author: ,..,,......,....,,,,..,.,...
I think you're confusing canon law with catholic doctrine/dogma, the latter of which is probably what you're really interested in. Canon law itself isn't really doctrine and most Catholics don't know or care about canon law
The church has never believed in "faith and works" the way it's understood in popular discourse. Of course there's a difference between Catholics and protestants on soteriology but its a different issue
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5715889&forum_id=2#48881997)
|
 |
Date: April 26th, 2025 1:43 AM
Author: ,..,,......,....,,,,..,.,...
The compendium is also really good since the catechism is kind of long winded. Reading the actual magisterial documents themselves is just painful
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5715889&forum_id=2#48882004) |
 |
Date: April 26th, 2025 1:50 AM
Author: ,..,,......,....,,,,..,.,...
https://www.vatican.va/archive/compendium_ccc/documents/archive_2005_compendium-ccc_en.html
Best thing benedict ever did
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5715889&forum_id=2#48882020) |
Date: April 26th, 2025 2:08 AM Author: Drunkard
How do you square Matt. 7:16-20? By that measure the roman catholics have it.
I am sure it is hubris and doubt, but this one haunts me.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5715889&forum_id=2#48882067) |
|
|