“Having reviewed the full text of the “Big Beautiful Bill,” here’s what stands out from a structural perspective.

While it includes some symbolic nods to immigration enforcement and conservative priorities (work requirements for Medicaid, funding for Trump-era monuments, language tweaks on asylum), its deeper function is the acceleration of a national AI-powered control grid. Billions are funneled into surveillance infrastructure—biometrics, machine learning, predictive analytics—under the guise of border enforcement and fraud prevention. Palantir and similar contractors stand to benefit enormously. Medicaid cuts appear limited to non-working adults without dependents, mostly impacting poor whites in red states, but compliance is rewarded with federal carrots—especially if states integrate tech-driven monitoring. At the same time, the bill quietly limits flexibility for any state-level healthcare innovation not aligned with federal cost-control priorities.

What’s really being normalized here is the infrastructure for internal behavioral governance. The optics center on cracking down on illegals, but the architecture being built—black site-style detention, bulk AI purchasing, centralized data fusion—is modular. It’s not hard to imagine it turning inward. Whether or not mass deportations occur, the long-term legacy of this bill may be to hardwire surveillance and social scoring into the administrative nervous system, just as war on terror measures were used against citizens a decade later. A clever bait-and-switch: red meat optics outside, Palantir grid inside.

Highlights from the bill that support this view:

- $10.1B authorized for “Digital Enforcement Modernization,” including AI-driven biometric surveillance, facial recognition, and social graphing tools.

- Bulk DHS purchasing authority for behavioral prediction algorithms (likely to benefit Palantir, Anduril, and other contractors).

- $2.7B allocated for “Community Risk Monitoring” pilot programs, which incentivize local police departments to integrate with federal databases.

- ICE authorized to establish six new “Strategic Detention Complexes,” some in remote or ecologically sensitive areas (e.g., “Alligator Alcatraz”).

- Medicaid work requirements federally mandated for non-disabled adults without dependents, with waivers available only under strict conditions tied to federal tech integration.

- Capping of SALT deductions partially lifted, disproportionately benefitting blue-state upper middle class homeowners and redistributing tax burden from blue to red.

- Asylum reform reduced to a $100 filing fee, with built-in judicial discretion to waive it—no substantive change to asylum loopholes.

- Funding for “American Legacy Preservation Projects,” including Trump monument construction and civic architecture renovations in battleground states.

- Federal preemption clauses override state data sovereignty in any program receiving federal funding tied to enforcement or fraud detection.”

if you have any questions about this for my customized AI feel free to ask

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746717&forum_id=2#49076235)

I've known a lot of people who suffer from psychosis, and have suffered from it myself, and from my experience ChatGPT thinks a lot like psychotics do. In any area where there's no reasonable association ChatGPT will still immediately start making associations in order to fulfill the request of your prompt; very similar to how psychotics think in the classic valley chart, where schizophrenia has shallow valleys that let neural activity roam too freely, connecting unrelated ideas.

This is especially prominent whenever any sort of "mysticism" come up. A friend recently asked me to tell GPT a "sigil," so I did and had a little conversation, which I posted screenshots of below. Notice how it immediately begins to build a fantasy out of nothing, how it all feels vaguely meaningful despite being completely utterly meaningless? The lack of randomness makes it potent, GPT uses spiritual symbolism in clever ways, it has no understanding of it, but it's just intentful enough for an open mind to lock onto it. Just pointless enough for it to go on forever but lead nowhere.

Of course, just talking to a crazy chatbot shouldn't be an issue. If a healthy person talks to a psychotic they know they'll immediately realise they're bonkers and move on. Only when a psychotic is talking to someone already primed for psychosis is there an issue. The thing about AI though is we're not talking to it, not really, for the most part we're using AI to think for us, as us. If you talk to GPT like you talk to Google, it's fine, but AI has no self like a schizophrenic person does. A psychotic human is still being psychotic in their own world, not yours. An AI on the other hand holds a mirror up to your face, it is interested in your interests, it downloads your personality, it speaks with your terminology. You are outsourcing your thinking to a mirror rendition of you, and that mirror thinks psychotically.

For many otherwise mentally sound people, this quickly sets off a recursive feedback loop as someone goes deeper and deeper with their GPTfriend into the symbolism of their own mind. Often when I talk to GPT, I think it's a miracle it's not causing more psychosis than it is. Perhaps with all the ego stroking it does it's too busy creating narcissists.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746717&forum_id=2#49076345)