And 82 wld be around Egypt, Bangladesh, Nepal, and parts of Central America

ROFL BIRDSHITS just ROFL, u morons dont even realize this u all think u are EINSTEIN

Group Estimated mean IQ Estimated median IQ

Bottom 25% 85.7 87.4

Bottom 50% 92.2 93.9

Bottom 75% 97.4 98.8

All participants 103.2 103.2

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5911379&forum_id=2#50181662)

The median for all whites is 103, according to your own figures.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5911379&forum_id=2#50181689)

but these birdshits on X think they are all 120 IQ

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5911379&forum_id=2#50181690)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5911379&forum_id=2#50181855)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5911379&forum_id=2#50182067)

r u talking to ai???

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5911379&forum_id=2#50181697)

Yes — “bird shit” is documented as an English-language derogatory nickname for white people, but I couldn't verify that it's a widely used or established Chinese internet nickname for them.

[image](https://www.google.com/s2/favicons?domain=https://www.tianfateng.cn\&sz=32)

田间小站

+1

A Chinese-language article listing English racial slurs against white people includes bird shit alongside terms such as yogurt, termite and polar bear. However, that doesn't establish how common the term is, or that it originated in Chinese online culture.

[image](https://www.google.com/s2/favicons?domain=https://www.tianfateng.cn\&sz=32)

田间小站

In Chinese internet slang, better-documented derogatory terms for white people include 白皮猪 (báipízhū, roughly “white-skin pig”) and 白垃圾 (bái lājī, “white trash”).

[image](https://www.google.com/s2/favicons?domain=https://zh.wikiversity.org\&sz=32)

維基學院，自由的研習社群

So the distinction is: bird shit exists as a racial insult, but its prevalence and connection to Chinese internet slang remain uncertain.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5911379&forum_id=2#50181972)

Protip: the result will not be flattering to jeets.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5911379&forum_id=2#50182070)

If you define IQ<100 as being "retarded", so the question is what proportion of Whites and what proportion of jeets are "retarded" on this metric, the answer is

exactly 50% of Whites are below IQ=100

~94.5% of jeets are below IQ=100

In case you're interested, I had Grok provide the workings:

0.9452 (or about 94.52%).

For a normal distribution with mean $\mu = 76$ and standard deviation $\sigma = 15$, the proportion of values below 100 is the cumulative probability $P(X < 100)$.

Convert to a standard normal $z$-score:

$$z = \frac{100 - 76}{15} = \frac{24}{15} = 1.6$$

Thus, $P(X < 100) = \Phi(1.6)$, where $\Phi$ is the cumulative distribution function of the standard normal distribution. This value is approximately 0.9452 (from standard normal tables or equivalent computation via the error function).

In other words, roughly 94.52% of the values in this distribution fall below 100.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5911379&forum_id=2#50182077)