The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Not a lawyer but why "turn over" incriminating shit during "discovery"?
| galvanic trailer park | 07/02/25 |
| titillating ultramarine property prole | 07/02/25 |
| galvanic trailer park | 07/02/25 |
| Exciting roommate | 07/02/25 |
| very tactful spot useless brakes | 07/02/25 |
| Soggy Cuckoldry | 07/02/25 |
| Ruddy adventurous national security agency | 07/02/25 |
| White cowardly coldplay fan orchestra pit | 07/02/25 |
| titillating ultramarine property prole | 07/02/25 |
| Dark Odious Senate | 07/02/25 |
| Pea-brained Histrionic School Cafeteria | 07/02/25 |
| Smoky location | 07/02/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: July 2nd, 2025 5:08 PM Author: galvanic trailer park The other side doesn't have it and doesn't know it exists, just don't give them the incriminating shit lol (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5745409&forum_id=2#49066970) |
Date: July 2nd, 2025 5:10 PM Author: titillating ultramarine property prole any big enough law firm is going to require that it have access to the clients files and will run search terms, etc. no point in an attorney refusing to turn it over even if the client doesn't want to. and theres going to be some degree of discovery on discovery/preservation efforts made. on a smaller level im sure it happens all the time. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5745409&forum_id=2#49066974) |
 |
Date: July 2nd, 2025 5:14 PM Author: galvanic trailer park Ok hide it and then if the opposition somehow finds it you can play dumb and in that case ur furked anyway so game theory says ur best bet is to not voluntarily hand it over (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5745409&forum_id=2#49066988) |
|
Date: July 2nd, 2025 5:10 PM Author: Exciting roommate ome weird trick (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5745409&forum_id=2#49066975) |
|
Date: July 2nd, 2025 5:26 PM Author: very tactful spot useless brakes winning isn't winning if it costs you your law license edit. i might have to rethink this |
|
Date: July 2nd, 2025 5:42 PM Author: Soggy Cuckoldry lol at it ever costing you your law license. Worst case is maybe getting your complaint/answer struck but that would be after multiple orders. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5745409&forum_id=2#49067042) |
|
Date: July 2nd, 2025 5:43 PM Author: Ruddy adventurous national security agency Enjoy hell. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5745409&forum_id=2#49067043) |
|
Date: July 2nd, 2025 5:55 PM Author: White cowardly coldplay fan orchestra pit This is why associates have a "bad docs" tag -- those are collected and sent to the partners so they can brainstorm reasons not to produce them, while the other 2 million pages of trash get produced.
The associates can later say they tagged it for further review and the partners can say "I thought this already got produced" if it ever surfaces through a third party or whatever. |
|
Date: July 2nd, 2025 7:04 PM Author: titillating ultramarine property prole "hot docs" (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5745409&forum_id=2#49067246) |
|
Date: July 2nd, 2025 7:05 PM Author: Dark Odious Senate "i don't think this document is even responsive!" (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5745409&forum_id=2#49067249) |
|
Date: July 2nd, 2025 7:23 PM Author: Pea-brained Histrionic School Cafeteria (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5745409&forum_id=2#49067291) |
|
Date: July 2nd, 2025 7:35 PM Author: Smoky location Technically, it's not incriminating if it's not produced. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5745409&forum_id=2#49067318) |