The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
The shomrim laws are very tedious to go through
| out-of-control messiness | 08/15/25 |
| Azure partner | 08/15/25 |
| out-of-control messiness | 08/15/25 |
| Supple Theater Stage Pocket Flask | 08/15/25 |
| cracking bearded set | 08/15/25 |
| out-of-control messiness | 08/15/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: August 15th, 2025 7:07 AM Author: out-of-control messiness (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762665&forum_id=2#49187123) |
Date: August 15th, 2025 7:25 AM Author: Azure partner This is the fundamental of western bailment law. It’s incredibly complicated in the Talmud. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762665&forum_id=2#49187145) |
 |
Date: August 15th, 2025 7:30 AM Author: out-of-control messiness If you're classified as a "borrower" or "shoel" there's an inexplicable exception to your liability over the watched object If the owner is with you even if you've already transferred possession and are in use of the object and this object is damaged or destroyed you're not legally obligated to replace or compensate for it I don't understand why |
|
Date: August 15th, 2025 10:39 AM Author: Supple Theater Stage Pocket Flask The Talmud does not supply a reason because it's a biblical edict. This law is derived from a close reading of the Bible verse describing the laws of a borrower. https://www.bible.com/bible/406/EXO.22.14-19.ERV
The reason probably is because the borrower cannot be considered a full bailee when the owner is present. |
|
Date: August 15th, 2025 10:01 AM Author: cracking bearded set Was just talking about this down at the feed store (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762665&forum_id=2#49187315) |
|
Date: August 15th, 2025 10:15 AM Author: out-of-control messiness Chuck's? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762665&forum_id=2#49187348) |