\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

lawyers rate this bankruptcy plan to get rid of fraud claims

party A sues party B for fraud and alleges all kinds of wilf...
crusty box office gay wizard
  03/24/25
I have a client in Party A's position. We were never notifie...
Lake church incel
  03/24/25
looks like theres a bunch of exceptions to discharge where t...
crusty box office gay wizard
  03/24/25
wouldn’t party a still have a tort claim but for the e...
Cerebral violet piazza striped hyena
  03/24/25
yea i think this is right
crusty box office gay wizard
  03/24/25
Depends on the language of the satisfaction agreement. It's ...
Pink becky stag film
  03/24/25
I dropped out of law school after 10 days but I believe this...
Carmine talented whorehouse people who are hurt
  03/24/25


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: March 24th, 2025 4:57 PM
Author: crusty box office gay wizard

party A sues party B for fraud and alleges all kinds of wilful and intentional behavior on party B's part.

party B enters into a settlement agreement with party A to settle the claim.

party B breaches the settlement agreement by failing to pay amounts owed under it.

Party A now has a breach of contract claim against party B.

Party A gets a judgment against party B for the amount of the settlement.

Party B discharges the amount owed to Party A as part of a bankruptcy filing because its based on breach of contract, while Party B could not have done so to get rid of the intentional tort claim.

Is there a flaw in this analysis?

Do defendants do this?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5699143&forum_id=2#48778172)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 24th, 2025 5:02 PM
Author: Lake church incel

I have a client in Party A's position. We were never notified of the BK before the bar date, so i think we'll get out without being discharged. But if he notified us he probably would have been able to do that

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5699143&forum_id=2#48778188)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 24th, 2025 5:05 PM
Author: crusty box office gay wizard

looks like theres a bunch of exceptions to discharge where the court is allowed to look at the claims a settlement agreement is settling before discharging a breach of K claim so it may not work after all

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5699143&forum_id=2#48778195)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 24th, 2025 5:08 PM
Author: Cerebral violet piazza striped hyena

wouldn’t party a still have a tort claim but for the effectiveness of a valid release through which the payments were structured? and wouldn’t the validity of that release likely hinge upon party b’s performance of those payments?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5699143&forum_id=2#48778203)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 24th, 2025 5:20 PM
Author: crusty box office gay wizard

yea i think this is right

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5699143&forum_id=2#48778248)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 24th, 2025 7:15 PM
Author: Pink becky stag film

Depends on the language of the satisfaction agreement. It's fairly common to see that the release of the claim depends on actual performance (usually including payment).

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5699143&forum_id=2#48778588)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 24th, 2025 5:21 PM
Author: Carmine talented whorehouse people who are hurt

I dropped out of law school after 10 days but I believe this is hearsay OP

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5699143&forum_id=2#48778255)