\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

lawyers rate this bankruptcy plan to get rid of fraud claims

party A sues party B for fraud and alleges all kinds of wilf...
internet g0y
  03/24/25
I have a client in Party A's position. We were never notifie...
penis bum
  03/24/25
looks like theres a bunch of exceptions to discharge where t...
internet g0y
  03/24/25
wouldn’t party a still have a tort claim but for the e...
literal scientist
  03/24/25
yea i think this is right
internet g0y
  03/24/25
Depends on the language of the satisfaction agreement. It's ...
~~(> ' ' )>
  03/24/25
I dropped out of law school after 10 days but I believe this...
daniel gay luis
  03/24/25


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: March 24th, 2025 4:57 PM
Author: internet g0y

party A sues party B for fraud and alleges all kinds of wilful and intentional behavior on party B's part.

party B enters into a settlement agreement with party A to settle the claim.

party B breaches the settlement agreement by failing to pay amounts owed under it.

Party A now has a breach of contract claim against party B.

Party A gets a judgment against party B for the amount of the settlement.

Party B discharges the amount owed to Party A as part of a bankruptcy filing because its based on breach of contract, while Party B could not have done so to get rid of the intentional tort claim.

Is there a flaw in this analysis?

Do defendants do this?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5699143&forum_id=2#48778172)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 24th, 2025 5:02 PM
Author: penis bum

I have a client in Party A's position. We were never notified of the BK before the bar date, so i think we'll get out without being discharged. But if he notified us he probably would have been able to do that

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5699143&forum_id=2#48778188)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 24th, 2025 5:05 PM
Author: internet g0y

looks like theres a bunch of exceptions to discharge where the court is allowed to look at the claims a settlement agreement is settling before discharging a breach of K claim so it may not work after all

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5699143&forum_id=2#48778195)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 24th, 2025 5:08 PM
Author: literal scientist

wouldn’t party a still have a tort claim but for the effectiveness of a valid release through which the payments were structured? and wouldn’t the validity of that release likely hinge upon party b’s performance of those payments?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5699143&forum_id=2#48778203)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 24th, 2025 5:20 PM
Author: internet g0y

yea i think this is right

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5699143&forum_id=2#48778248)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 24th, 2025 7:15 PM
Author: ~~(> ' ' )>

Depends on the language of the satisfaction agreement. It's fairly common to see that the release of the claim depends on actual performance (usually including payment).

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5699143&forum_id=2#48778588)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 24th, 2025 5:21 PM
Author: daniel gay luis

I dropped out of law school after 10 days but I believe this is hearsay OP

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5699143&forum_id=2#48778255)