Tinder and OKC were full of real girls filling out lengthy profiles and answering dozens of survey questions. All gone, just bots and IG scammers now.

Drudge Report had a unique approach to mainstream news. Queer on a laptop scooped the world on Lewinsky. Not even worth a click now.

4chan was FULL of wild, deranged, and smart stuff. /Lit/, /b/, /pol/, etc were all very active and doing things irl.

Twitter was a wild west.

Youtube was barely moderated.

Bodybuilding fora. Blogs. Comment sections.

None of these places really exist anymore, or they do they are bland and corporate and heavily curated.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5276842&forum_id=2#45834462)

YouTube bro: "No, let's not."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5276842&forum_id=2#45834479)

the vagina shaving videos or w/e don't violate TOS for some reason. it's not like they're just slipping under the radar.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5276842&forum_id=2#45834684)

Now we all now what every fag making the yogapants vagina videos and the measure the Mexican girls' clitorises video will say. "Sir, actually, this is in no way meant for sexual gratification. How dare you." Which we all know is full of shit, unless you or I have really found it educationally edifying to see the measurement of 25 Mex chicks' clits by a doctor who just so happens to also have an OnlyFans account. (And did I ever find it educational!)

If YouTube were actually being moderated, all that shit would be removed. I'm assuming we've both had experiences at some sites with real moderation and we both recognize none of that would fly.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5276842&forum_id=2#45835395)

My CLE would be on why this is unethical and people shouldn't do it.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5276842&forum_id=2#45835423)

some moderator decided that these vids fit within the rules because they are ostensibly not for sexual gratification. now obviously both you and i know that's bullshit, but that doesn't mean it's unmoderated. it's far more likely that the vid was cleared under their interpretation of their own rules rather than it just slipping under the radar.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5276842&forum_id=2#45838560)

technology has literally regressed since 2011

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5276842&forum_id=2#45834481)

The creators who get promoted are the blandest and there's a feedback effect where bland globohomo goyslop getting promoted leads creators to favor making such in their creations & dulls people's senses to the wide range of creative possibility.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5276842&forum_id=2#45834529)

That's basically what is left of the internet, at least for english speakers.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5276842&forum_id=2#45834535)

no shit that the internet sucking is small potatoes compared to the big things in life. he is still free to complain about. it's not like he's saying his life is over because youtube sucks now.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5276842&forum_id=2#45834699)

i loved rt when it first came out. it was a great way to quickly see if something was worthwhile. unfortunately because rt is just a yes/no binary movies that are just "ok" will get very high ratings, whereas high quality yet divisive movies will not. on top of that all the reviewers have gone ultra woke. so now it's practically useless, aside from the fact that now when i see a high rt score i'm more skeptical than excited.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5276842&forum_id=2#45834708)

matter of fact, that reminds me of another lost internet treasure: all the ratings sites. hot or not. rate my prof. etc. Like rotten tomatoes but for people.

i suppose they still do this on reddit, but there are a thousand dyke mods to ban you from saying mean things

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5276842&forum_id=2#45834756)

answer: very! not only did they remove the "hot" rating, but now it seems professors can take over their pages and ask for corrections. lol... just lol.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5276842&forum_id=2#45834768)

Cant believe some tards honored the system and stayed stuck at the bottom

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5276842&forum_id=2#45834778)

180 [INSTRUCTOR REQUEST CORRECTION]

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5276842&forum_id=2#45835348)

they believe this makes them savvy eaters with inside knowledge, idk.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5276842&forum_id=2#45839587)

I don’t trust a single review of literally anything anywhere on the internet

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5276842&forum_id=2#45835132)

also there are these bizarre sites which are very clearly SEO scam intended solely to get you to purchase things through their amazon links.

here is one example (googled "top hair dryers 2023")

https://www.techforgamers.com/best-hair-dryer/

at no point has the person who wrote this article ever used a single one of these products. in fact I bet it's written by a computer, skimming language from the amazon page, then cleaned up and edited by a person

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5276842&forum_id=2#45839595)

https://solanamobile.com/

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5276842&forum_id=2#45834680)

i think most of my interests would not be to your liking

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5276842&forum_id=2#45835239)

i feel like maybe discord is a more unmoderated space, but i could be wrong

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5276842&forum_id=2#45839764)