Don't get married: ROBOT SEX PARTNERS by 2025 (link)
| cyan locale hissy fit | 08/15/14 | | Razzle parlor | 08/15/14 | | cyan locale hissy fit | 08/15/14 | | Soul-stirring aqua principal's office | 08/15/14 | | Twisted heady bawdyhouse | 08/15/14 | | Razzle parlor | 08/15/14 | | aphrodisiac depressive water buffalo | 07/01/25 | | Orange space gay wizard | 07/01/25 | | Gaped deep meetinghouse | 07/01/25 | | Misanthropic bateful stead dingle berry | 07/01/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: August 15th, 2014 7:17 PM Author: Razzle parlor
what would be the implications of this? suppose they were cheap enough that any guy could afford one, and that the sex was almost indistinguishable from sex with a real female.
what percent of men would still pursue women?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2646446&forum_id=2#26137011) |
|
|