Author: my golf swing is the only thing I care about (death in the afternoon)

It is not necessary even to look beyond the moniker. "Whokebe," pronounced in the mind, or aloud, is reminiscent of "who can he be?" This question, however, is blurred and distorted into the tribal utterance, "Whokebe," and one can image this ultimate question being chanted around the fires of our most ancient human ancestors. The effect of this figurative transformation is to brilliantly suggest that we are all Whokebe; we are all the answer to the question: "who can he be?" In this sense, Whokebe becomes an "everyman" voicing the universal concerns of all humanity about body image and the finance industry. More elusive, and perhaps more interesting, is the reality that, in the literal sense, Whokebe is actually the only poster on this site.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=647451&forum_id=2#8278257)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4107869&forum_id=2#37033898)

2018 - 0

😭

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4107869&forum_id=2#37036291)

Update: One pity bump.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4107869&forum_id=2#37037937)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4107869&forum_id=2#37057812)

Author: Vector's semi-retired rectum

To elucidate further the issue of W as everyman, a prominent branch of contemporary whokebology, an examination of the whokebe chronology is required. Skeptics have cautioned against adding to the already saturated corpus of whokebe mythography. I maintain that a more thorough and conscientious scholarship can help us avoid the trap of devolving into whokebe hagiography, and indeed, will help us construct a wholly immanent whokebe. The disappearance of whokebe in 2006, through a theologic prism, would appear analogous to the ascent of Christ; and his occasional <sup, doods?> thereafter, renders all too easy a comparison with the descent of the Holy Spirit during Pentacost and subsequent religious revivals. Among the more mystically minded, there exists a sect fervent in its belief that the recent series of legal and extra-legal debacles faced by xoxo are in reality eschatological events and therefore augur the return of whokebe in whole and undisguised form. I would argue, however, that it is possible to conceptualize whokebe as the ground of being that pervades every xoxo post, that in fact the disappearance of whokebe is a theological slight of hand: whokebe has been with us all along.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=647451&forum_id=2#8278363)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4107869&forum_id=2#37055593)

http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=2840029&mc=195&forum_id=2

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4107869&forum_id=2#37057839)