some of us are lockdown JACKED

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4570370&forum_id=2#40497944)

worth watching though. it turned from an interview to a (an albeit friendly) debate pretty quickly.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4570370&forum_id=2#40497354)

https://twitter.com/ggreenwald/status/1276325809222017025

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4570370&forum_id=2#40497398)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4570370&forum_id=2#40497554)

Tucker BTFO!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4570370&forum_id=2#40497367)

http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=3939704&mc=79&forum_id=2#35766748

Here is the part which shoots down the smug cunt:

“Various thinkers have pointed out that leftism is a kind of religion. Leftism is not a religion in the strict sense because leftist doctrine does not postulate the existence of any supernatural being. But, for the leftist, leftism plays a psychological role much like that which religion plays for some people. The leftist NEEDS to believe in leftism; it plays a vital role in his psychological economy.”

223. Some readers may say, "This stuff about leftism is a lot of crap. I know John and Jane who are leftish types and they don't have all these totalitarian tendencies." It's quite true that many leftists, possibly even a numerical majority, are decent people who sincerely believe in tolerating others' values (up to a point) and wouldn't want to use high-handed methods to reach their social goals. Our remarks about leftism are not meant to apply to every individual leftist but to describe the general character of leftism as a movement. And the general character of a movement is not necessarily determined by the numerical proportions of the various kinds of people involved in the movement.

224. The people who rise to positions of power in leftist movements tend to be leftists of the most power- hungry type, because power-hungry people are those who strive hardest to get into positions of power. Once the power-hungry types have captured control of the movement, there are many leftists of a gentler breed who inwardly disapprove of many of the actions of the leaders, but cannot bring themselves to oppose them. They NEED their faith in the movement, and because they cannot give up this faith they go along with the leaders. True, SOME leftists do have the guts to oppose the totalitarian tendencies that emerge, but they generally lose, because the power-hungry types are better organized, are more ruthless and Machiavellian and have taken care to build themselves a strong power base.

226. Thus the fact that many individual leftists are personally mild and fairly tolerant people by no means prevents leftism as a whole form having a totalitarian tendency.”

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4570370&forum_id=2#40497635)

>> What we need to understand from all of this is that this is the natural modus operandi of the progressive Left. These things are what they do. You know the old saw that “power corrupts,” as if office seekers were naturally good people who are then perverted by power? Well, throw it out for the whiggish rubbish that it is. The reality is precisely the opposite – the Left gains power this way because of the fact that the corrupt are seeking power. It’s not as if these people get into positions where they can exercise power and then it goes to their heads. No. They seek out positions of power specifically because they want to implement exactly the type of process detailed above and are perfectly willing to disregard or procedurally manipulate whatever impediments might stand in their way. They don’t “play fair” because they don’t see any reason to and never had any intention of doing so to begin with. <<

https://neociceroniantimes.wordpress.com/2019/08/27/understanding-the-left-a-case-study-from-micronationry/

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4570370&forum_id=2#40497669)

https://www2.pictures.zimbio.com/gi/Krystal+Ball+Jonathan+Dariyanani+AFMDA+Red+-lmh9ynSLVql.jpg

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4570370&forum_id=2#40498140)

everything i thought I knew is a lie

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4570370&forum_id=2#40498432)

her IQ is higher than my T levels

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4570370&forum_id=2#40498221)

charles btfo

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4570370&forum_id=2#40499271)

those issues are literally insignificant compared to tech giants monopolies & other corporate vs. middle america issues

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4570370&forum_id=2#40501106)

Women like this are more valuable to libs than 1000 blue haired lesbians screaming in the streets. Literally she makes fun of people who thinks libs are coming for churches while prominent libs are talking about coming after churches.

I bet Stalin had women like this.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4570370&forum_id=2#40501131)