He is a self made man. He doesn’t live off daddy like some 45 year old childless house pet.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5586079&forum_id=2#48029657)

Also you’re tremendously fat. Really, really just a slob. Not good!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5586079&forum_id=2#48031172)

This thread, initiated with the provocative question of why two prominent AutoAdmit poasters, "RSF" and "CSLG," reportedly hate each other, quickly devolves into a blend of mockery, speculation, and personal attacks. The discussion offers insights into both the personalities involved and the broader dynamics of the board.

Key Themes and Insights:

Derogatory Nicknames and Character Assassination:

The use of "Big Titty RSF" and "Jew Rat CSLG" reflects AutoAdmit's tendency to employ mocking and pejorative nicknames, often targeting physical attributes, ethnicity, or perceived moral failings. The monikers alone suggest a hostile environment where identity and personal traits are weaponized for ridicule.

Allegations of Parasitism and Moral Deficiencies:

Several poasters, such as "lemon station personal credit line" and "soul-stirring theatre," label RSF and CSLG as "Jewish parasites" or criticize them for perceived societal parasitism. These accusations extend to family wealth, alleged exploitation (e.g., "9/11 blood money"), and their Jewish heritage. Such comments highlight the antisemitic undercurrents that occasionally surface on AutoAdmit, where provocative language is used to bait or demean.

The Wealth Controversy:

The perception of RSF as living off family wealth ("Big Titty RSF") becomes a focal point for mockery. "Arousing depressive pisswyrm" sarcastically presents RSF as a "self-made man" while actually suggesting he relies on family money and questioning his professional credibility. This aligns with previous themes where RSF's financial status and its origins (family wealth or self-earned) are debated, reflecting tension over class, privilege, and authenticity on the board.

Insecurity and Envy Dynamics:

Poasters like "Arousing depressive pisswyrm" and "soul-stirring theatre" paint RSF as insecure, easily provoked, and envious, while also portraying CSLG as unlikeable. These descriptions reveal a dynamic of perceived vulnerability among the poasters, with others seeking to exploit perceived insecurities for entertainment or to provoke reactions.

Humor and Irony as Tactics:

Several poasters employ humor and irony in their contributions. For example, "thriller citrine persian" compares RSF and CSLG to the two last Jews in Afghanistan post-9/11, who reportedly despised each other. This hyperbolic, humorous framing trivializes their alleged conflict, suggesting it is petty or performative.

The Suggestion of Performance for the Board:

"180 stag film codepig" posits that the apparent animosity between RSF and CSLG might be performative, designed to entertain or provoke the board. This comment implies that much of the conflict seen on AutoAdmit may be less about genuine personal disputes and more about creating spectacle for the audience.

Reactions to RSF and CSLG's Conflicts:

"Erotic impertinent bbw organic girlfriend" challenges the negative characterizations of RSF, suggesting that criticisms of his wealth or family are irrelevant to his personal conduct. This illustrates the polarized responses RSF garners; some defend him, while others use him as a target.

Money as a Point of Contention:

The repeated references to money—whether RSF’s family money or CSLG's financial standing—highlight how economic status becomes a tool for both criticism and self-defense on the board. For some, money is a symbol of legitimacy and power; for others, it is an avenue for derision, especially if perceived as unearned.

Personal Attacks and Baiting:

"Apoplectic double fault giraffe" challenges "Arousing depressive pisswyrm's" characterization of RSF, leading to a back-and-forth where insults ("tremendously fat," "slob") are exchanged. This reinforces the AutoAdmit culture of direct, often harsh confrontation, where insults are part of the discourse.

Conclusion:

This thread exemplifies the combative, provocative nature of AutoAdmit discussions, where poasters frequently engage in ad hominem attacks, sarcasm, and irony. RSF and CSLG, as frequent targets, serve as symbols around which broader board tensions—concerning wealth, ethnicity, authenticity, and personal achievement—are articulated. The possibility that the animosity between them is performative suggests a self-aware culture where conflict is as much for the poasters’ amusement as for genuine debate. This thread reinforces the notion that on AutoAdmit, poasters leverage humor, personal attacks, and irony to navigate the board’s competitive and often antagonistic environment.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5586079&forum_id=2#48069604)